this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
518 points (97.8% liked)

memes

22412 readers
3194 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xia@lemmy.ca 19 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Soon... about tree-fiddy...

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It was about that time I noticed that sweet little pop rapper was a right story tall crustacean from the plethazoic era. I said get it out here!

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 50 minutes ago
[–] undefinedTruth@lemmy.zip 18 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Not how inflation works. He still is 50 Cent, his value just dropped.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah exactly. At birth, his value in today's money is about $3.10. assuming he is still $0.50, his purchasing power has dropped by more than 80%

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Well if you ask a coin collector a coins rarity effects it's value greatly. Being 50 Cent is the only half dollar stamped with 1975, that explains why he is now worth so much.

[–] undefinedTruth@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, but then you are talking about the non-fungability tied to his distinct features, not his transactional value.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You didn't think it was cool at all that no half dollars were minted with 1975 on them? Sheesh... I really am a dork

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago

I thought it was cool, thanks for teaching me an interesting fact!

[–] lokalhorst@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Wow he got so old which means I got old as well FML

[–] nedwben@lemmy.ca 20 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Was he fifty at birth?

His first album was 2003; 'Get Rich or Die Tryin'. If 50 cents was his valuation then, that would mean Curtis Jackson's valuation was 22¢ at birth in 1975. Assuming he follows a somewhat arbitrary inflation rate of 3%. (This is also assuming he is not an asset of higher expected return like property, stocks, or bonds.) Putting him at a less attractive 99¢ today.

If he is the the currency himself, rather than being valuated at 50¢, then he would have devalued. This would put his value at around 27¢ today and $1.68 at birth.

Sauce

[–] Syltti@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I'm glad someone pointed it out.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

If 50 cents was his valuation then, that would mean Curtis Jackson's valuation was 22¢ at birth in 1975. Assuming he follows a somewhat arbitrary inflation rate of 3%.

But that's just inflation. His physical and mental development surely added value, meaning he was probably worth much less than 22¢ at birth.

Also, link preview kind of ruined your sauce joke, but I still liked it.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

So ~~60~~ 50 years is 600%? That's crazy

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 27 points 19 hours ago

Not wages though!

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

lol, trolling people born near 1975

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

O lol, not on purpose - i just suck at math

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 12 points 19 hours ago

He's not even about tree fiddy, poor sod

[–] gezero@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

3.5 percent per year more or less

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

He'd have been better off just putting himself in an index fund.