this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
636 points (97.7% liked)

memes

22584 readers
2626 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 92 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Back in my day, YouTube had a 5-star rating system

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

And the video's rating was plainly visible so you could use it to make the decision whether the video was even worth your click.

The shovelware AI slop video channels wouldn't be such a problem today if we still had that.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Going straight to YouTube is like going straight to Imgur looking for good content. Should never be done. Places like Lemmy or friend chat groups refer me to good videos. Or my curated subscribed channels with quality content is the other way I watch youtube.

Anyone going straight to YouTube.com looking for their algorithm and ratings system to tell them about shit content in advance is mistaken in their expectations.

[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

extensive use of the "Don't recommend this video > Tell us why > I don't like this video" function, plus removing bad videos from my watch history after I stop watching, has got me a well-trained slop-free recommendations page with interesting new smallish channels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Usually I go there looking for something specific and use the search bar.

However, the search function in YouTube has also turned to absolute crap. It only lists a few results and then switches to random shit you didn't ask for.

A lot of the results are also often misleading titles leading to lazy videos that are a slideshow of impertinent pictures with a synthetized voice spewing inaccurate information. AI has made that even worse. The star rating system would have helped identify these crap videos before you click on them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 month ago (4 children)

and search results showed only videos related to your search. recommendations on the side were similar videos and not some unrelated bullshit. it was so much better.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly if someone remade an old YouTube alternative I think it would take off.

It’s what I wish PeerTube was, but I’m not sure if that will ever take off sadly.

Lack of advertising dollars is definitely an impediment to video platform alternatives…

I remember a time when people just posted silly little shitty drawn videos just for the fun of it. Not saying creators shouldn’t be compensated for their hard work, I just feel like something was lost with the monetization of every little thing.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The trouble is hosting that much video content and the bandwidth to feed viewers.

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

People really fail to understand what a truly colossal undertaking a site like YouTube is. It's a technological wonder that they are able to process that much data and serve it so efficiently. Hate YouTube all you want, I do, but the engineers at Google are fucking magicians.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] laurenceOfSuburbia@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Back in my day, there were alternatives to Google

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Back in my day, memes weren't Ai "enhanced" and Bart didn't have a vagina for an ear.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What is going on with that vaginear anyway? And the random grass rectangle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hey man, they're raggin' on your vaginear!

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You sweet summer child, back in my day YouTube had a five star rating system and video response functionality.

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Gotta say, don't miss video responses. It was nearly all irrelevant content and people trying to advertise their own channels

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fistac0rpse@fedia.io 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

no one uses the return YouTube dislikes browser extension?

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

I don’t want my watchlist stored on a random third party server

[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What's the point, if the downvotes aren't counted by the YT backend?

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

To save you time avoiding a bad instructional video.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It's a good enough approximation. Do you really need to know if the massively downvoted video had 357,923 downvotes or 357,924?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (8 children)

back in my day, you posted about your life in your geocities website! And you wrote the html on notepad and had to include an animated gif that told people to email you, cause that was the style at the time.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Some people still do on Neocities

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It still does, it just doesn't show numbers because YouTube is a coward.

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 14 points 1 month ago (9 children)

No the API is dead. The extension everyone is using calculates their own dislike number by inferring from the extension users who disliked the video

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All I want these days is a "Don't show me any fucking AI slop" setting and a button to report AI slop.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Tidal has a no-AI button, if it helps. They've just introduced it. That's music taken care of, I guess. It's something.

YouTube is letting people mark their videos as AI or not AI and I assume doing nothing with it? I think I've stumbled upon an AI video or two on YouTube but I didn't see any labels?

EDIT: Oh, fuck, are they just asking us to label our videos "non-AI" so they don't train their own AI on AI slop? Fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ah, I remember when you paused and the whole video was buffering. You could have multiple tabs open and watch the video when it was done. No matter what kind of connection you had, you could simply wait for the video to finish downloading in the background and watch it without problems.

No ads, a 5-star rating system, 100% buffering, and mostly enthusiasts posting, no profit-driven incentives. We didn't know how good we had it.

I hate the way YouTube now gives millions of dollars to people exploiting children watching videos - be it slop factories or 'influencer' preying on their insecurities.

In a just society YouTube would have been destroyed as a pseudo-monopoly ages ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago

Back in my day, you could customize your YouTube profile and PM anyone on the platform

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

And this meme wasn't AI upscaled

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

We're all being punished because Google's feelings got hurt when we didn't like the 2018 YouTube Rewind enough. That was the end of the dislike button and the YouTube Rewind altogether.

[–] QueenHawlSera@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

It still does.

[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

I've never blocked as many channels as now after they removed the dislike button on the shorts section.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I miss being able to tell people they suck with just one click

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What pushed me to use revanced some years ago.

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Return youtube dislike extension.

[–] smaximov@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DeLancre@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, but actually no.

2 things:

  1. Dislike button itself not "wired' to any visible/meaningful count and only seen by video author (which is funny, cause whole point of hiding dislike count was promoted as "beneficial to mental health of channel owners")
  2. If you using youtube dislikes — it replaces that button with it's own, counts presses on its own and uses own logic to show "approximate" amount of dislikes on video: it's not like it knows real count, what I'm trying to say
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

YouTube used to not have ads.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

YouTube has ads?

#uBlock Origin

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Iunnrais@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I seem to recall that people found that the like and dislike buttons equally improved the video’s visibility in the algorithm, causing many youtubers to genuinely suggest disliking the video as their call to action.

[–] MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That's more of an issue with their algorithm. The thing I think most people here (myself included) miss is that they used to let you know the rating on videos before you clicked them so you could see whether a given video was decent or not and therefore whether or not you should bother with some clickbait BS or not

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 month ago

i remember spending two hours making sure the background of my youtibe profile theme tiled correctly.

load more comments
view more: next ›