this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
175 points (97.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

17273 readers
693 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This is horrible for America.

Matthew Broderick, an actor I used to respect, is now doing commercials for another gambling app, except this one isn't sports or cards or slots, it's games that resemble Candy Crush, etc. with a gambling component built in.

They aren't targeting young men with this one, they are targeting middle-aged women, and not just any middle-aged women, they are targeting those with unfulfilled lives. I've seen three separate ads, and all of them feature middle-aged women who are being ignored or treated badly by their families. They look sad, until Ferris Beuller sidles up and gives them this fun new game to play, and forget their troubles. I've never seen a more blatant attempt to take advantage of a emotionally unstable person than these ads. They are reprehensible.

Add to that, the fact that many household budgets are handled by the Wife/Mom. It's only a matter of time before we start seeing stories of women who lost the family home because they gambled away the family finances.

This is insidious. They are trying to keep as much money out of our hands as possible, and what we do get, they scheme to take it all away. They want us to die penniless.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

John hamm, they got Hamm and he rarely does any ads at all.

[–] Kurtismayfield@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 hours ago

Hamn is a horrible human being.

A pledge died at his fraternity under his watch. The individuals involved barely got a slap on the wrist.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

"So long as they (the Proles) continued to work and breed, their other activities were without importance. Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern...Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbors, films, football, beer and above all, gambling filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult."

George Orwell, 1984

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I've long been pro vice. People should be free to drink, fuck, do drugs, gamble… Strict prohibition doesn't work, can backfire, and often involves a lot of state violence. But there's a difference between a trip to Vegas or a Native American nation here and there, friday night poker with the friends, and a charity Monte Carlo night from time to time vs what we have now.

The current gambling situation in America is like having a vodka faucet in every home that can't be disconnected. It's like being besieged with ads for opiate delivery apps. It makes gambling so easy an addict can't avoid it and it's constantly being shoved down our throats. When gambling was difficult it was reasonable for a person without an addictive personality or family history of addiction to give it a shot, but these days it's like playing with fire while unable to tell if you're coated in gasoline.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 20 hours ago

I had figured it would, once gambling regulations were bypassed, and no-one recognized that gambling houses make for a moral hazard.

For a long time the US economy has depended on companies exploiting human cognitive biases and addictive mechanisms, from selling booze to bank service fees, to click-wrapped ToS agreements, and yes, to gambling.

There's a reason we regulated it, much the way we regulate advertising so that it's not deceptive.

One beef is the slop of fear and rage that is used to sell far right news media. FOX News even encourages its viewership to abandon all over news sources, like an abusive domestic partner.

If we don't figure out a way out of it, so that confidence ploys and cognitive manipulation for profit are once again regarded as foul play and business in bad faith, then we're just going to be owned by the ownership class. Literally.

But they're not very smart, so they'll not do a thing to address the climate crisis.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

How is it different than day trading in the stock market? Both systems are fixed to lose.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no hope for this place. May our children forgive us.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Kinda hope they don’t. The US was equipped with plenty of ways, even through the propaganda, to dodge the evil bullshit and the country just keeps barrelling towards hell. And here in Canada we’re doing the same thing, arguably worse because the US is RIGHT THERE and we’re like “nah, I’m not going to learn from those mistakes actually.”

Canada and the US do not deserve forgiveness. May our children survive us, and may they have the strength to hate all the conservatives, “centrists”, and politically ignorant people who sold their lives to a handful of the most stupid, greedy, and dweeby fucks the human race has ever produced.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 64 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The word is 'lose', not 'spend'.

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 day ago

And 'addiction', not 'favourite pastime'.

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, spend is right. The number being compared against is the amount spent on gambling. Obviously some of those bets won, so the amount lost would be far less.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All fair points. I just object to people breathlessly putting out stores like this as if it a good thing and anything other than gambling at best, and insider trading at worst. The only people winning on those sites are the people with inside information.

(edit: fixed typos)

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Most gambling winnings go right back into gambling and are subsequently lost.

I would be surprised if it was “far less” although mathematically it must be strictly less.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

In other words, the average American adult placed roughly $1,000 in legal bets on sports last year. Handle is gross throughput, not consumer expenditure: over 90% of what is wagered gets returned to bettors in the form of winnings. That $1,000 in bets translates to roughly $100 in average losses per adult.

But it does point out the vast majority of the losses are absorbed by 5% of gamblers.

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

Say I started with $100 and made a bet but only won 90 back. Then the next day I do it again with my 90, but only win 80 this time. Repeat this until I have $10 left, I bet that and lose it.

By your logic, I’ve lost $550, since thats the amount of money I’ve bet over the week and a half. In reality, any sane person would say I’ve lost $100.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah, they would be better advised to throw their money into the garbage, at least that way they wouldn't make some rich asshole even richer.

[–] xylol@leminal.space 8 points 1 day ago

Nice try big garbage industry man

[–] pipi1234@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What a deranged headline.

Its comparison is nonsensical.

No sane person gambles for entertaining purposes.

People gamble because they are addicts or in need of money.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

Who isn't in need of money? Isn't that the overwhelming majority of people?

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Sane people will put in 20$ for fun at the casino after a nice dinner date. So yes, it happens.

[–] Kurtismayfield@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The sports gambling apps will be the number one cause of divorce in the US one day. The sheer number of married men betting on them..

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago

It's going the other way, too. I just wrote a wall of text about the new Candy Crush style of gambling apps that are targeting unfulfilled middle-aged women, encouraging them to play these apps to self-soothe after poor treatment by their families. Seriously, that's the pitch in the three separate ads I've seen, featuring celebrity spokesperson Ferris Beuller.

Women often handle the family finances. Soon we'll be seeing stories of women who lost the house gambling on high-octane Candy Crush.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is a very American thing.

Measuring popularity in terms of money spent.

By this metric, spending time with loved ones or going for a short walk has zero popularity.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Spoiler: This is how GDP works too. Didn't make any money? It's not considered real work. EVERYTHING in the US serves capital - not people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chortle_tortle@mander.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

Americans love the surprising new hobby of shooting up fentanyl, spending more on it than food or housing!

[–] vapordays@leminal.space 5 points 1 day ago

healthy society, good economy

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago

I hate this country more every day

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sign of a real healthy society, that.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. More people are desperate and are trying for a chance to “win it big” and get out of the situation they’re in. Whereas art, museums, etc. doesn’t help an immediate living situation and gets deprioritized

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well... you don't get money back from movies, arts, museums, or music, but there is a miniscule chance you could from gambling.

With the economy the way it is, it's more likely people are just desperate. And some are definitely addicted, of course.

Yeah, this unfortunately. Too real

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah in part that is because it isn't a pastime it's a full blown life crippling addiction for a lot of people.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The language they use in this article pisses me off too.

This shit isn't healthy and talking about it like it is a healthy behavior is very irresponsible on the part of the media.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To make everyone feel even more awful, the "commercials before the movie" will probably start to have "financial engagement opportunities" as the theater houses look to try to stay alive. Pro sports venues will make it more "in your face" and offer discounts on food if you are wagering or better seats or free game tickets or some shit. Books, well most Americans don't read as adults so I think that'll continue it's current state at least. Live theater could wager on what color Hamlet's scene two entrance clothes will be....at the end of the day they'll probably hop on for survival since many of their patrons or past donors are similarly disengaging.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The amount of money spent doesn't really accurately represent how much a past time is "liked", since money (obviously) isn't distributed evenly. A more useful metric would be how much time people spend doing this in comparison to the other options, which is impossible to measure. Also in theory it could be literally 1 or 2 people doing the gambling if they have enough money, while everyone else goes to museums and listens to music.

It's even more true with the other options not being exactly expensive (in particular museums, but the other options are will). Try spending 50k $ gambling: no problem. Try spending 1k $ going to museums: you'll be busy for 2 years or something.

Basically the whole premise is just dumb.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anything but vote for somebody to tax wealth instead of work.

[–] vapordays@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who can I vote for who would actually do that?

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 17 hours ago

Depends which country you're in. UK: Greens, France: LFI, US: independents, Italy: Partito Democratico, ...

I don't gamble but at that same time, I can't pirate gambling.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Gambling should be banned. And not just the prediction markets and sports-book, but the lottery too.

It's just theft with extra steps.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 11 hours ago

Then it just goes underground, where it's worse. Better to keep it above board, but that requires responsible regulation and enforcement, which hasn't been the case.

Most importantly, there should be absolutely no advertising of any kind, period, and that goes for ALL vices - alcohol, cigarettes, weed, etc. We shouldn't be encouraging people to participate in these activities.

We should also levy special taxes on these vices, which go to treatment facilities, so that anyone can get free treatment for addictions, and to anti-vice marketing and advertising.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

Yea it’s one of the few things I’m like nope, should be illegal fully don’t give a fuck.

[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Don't forget the stock market.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Gambling always goes up as the economy gets worse for the average worker.

[–] Ramsesder13te@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Bread and games...

load more comments
view more: next ›