A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
This is not because views of China have improved. It's just that the view of the US has gotten that bad
Yeah, the graph clearly shows that for most of these countries it is just the US moving down on the shittiness scale. It is not like these countries are suddenly saying "we love China now", the US has just overtaken them on appearing more shitty. They are both in a race to the bottom.
Absolutely, as a European I am more worried about China than before, because without EU and USA being allies on the global scene, there is no doubt that China will dominate even sooner.
None of us can balance out China alone. But hopefully China will be a more graceful world leader than USA. 🙏
Looking at the 6 countries being more fond of the US, we essentially have 3 groups.
But for most, China is reliable and you understand what their goals are. Because they literally have a 100 year plan and tells you most things in advance. Trump is just a smoking gun, he'll do something today, something else tomorrow and I can't even fathom what he'll do the day after - While being corrupted more than any leader of a major country ever has
If you look at the original pew page you can see views of China have improved:
across 20 countries: Median % who have a favorable opinion of China went from 32% in 2023 to 46% in 2026
I mean... China didn't threat us with war.
Yeah, sure... They have the largest coast guard vessel on the planet, and they're not exactly keeping their distance, but instead actively pursue then if they feel like powertripping, ram anything that's not flying the red flag.
Okay... and the US threatened to invade Greenland and Canada, bombed multiple fishing boats in international waters, performed a coup in Venezuela, and started a new war in the Middle East
Okay.. and who has the largest overall military and actually has been invading countries for decades?
China is very predictable as they well stick to their 5, 10, 15 and 25 year plan. It is just that China is always vilified by the western propaganda - which is doing well based on comments here.
China is not setting out for world domination by military force unlike the US. China has 1 army base outside of China (Cambodia) whereas the US has 128. China has not invaded any country militarily since 1979 (Vietnam). Everyone here will yell about Taiwan but maybe if you look at the history this has been going on since the 1800's.
The only Chinese military deployed outside of China, is as part of UN peace keeping force.
China does not interfere openly or barely even comment on external events. Do they work behind the scenes and sometimes neferously - of course. But let's not pretend any other country doesn't do the same thing.
It is quite sad that the world doesn't want to understand China at all. And actually that currently works in their favour as they are getting more self sufficient in regards to green energy, technology incl. chip design, infrastructure including building their own Comac aircrafts. Not to mention the US is gifting China huge soft power. If you have seen how many world leaders have visited China this year alone, it is staggering.
If an opportunity arises to do something impactful on the world stage, they will not shy away, but never ever will they be the bully like the US.
China is focused on China. They have a backup plan for the backup plan for the backup plan.
After this Ted talk I just want to say that the Chinese people are some of the kindest, most generous people in the world, the food is amazing and unbelievably diverse, as is the country itself. From mountains, deserts, jungles, grasslands, beaches, cities, and its rich history and culture; it is an extraordinary place to see.
China is also doing a lot more to curb global warming than USA is.
USA is a total scumbag country in that regard.
It was because of Covid, when I saw social media going into litteral foul hatred against China, despite all reasoning, that I started to think differently as a "Western" resident.
I realised all I know about China is US propaganda and hate. Facts are US helped China become strong, then they complain when China becomes a much stronger country since US put all their factories in there, all for monetary gains for their billionaires.
US will claim how they're democratic while China isn't. Placing Trump two times in power made all "democratic" arguments null, since he's going violently after people.
It still don't know China by today. Whether it's a good or bad country I can't know. The only thing I know is who is going into stupid wars and who kills hundred of thousand of people. And it's not China.
USA is the worst country to exist in this world.
I can agree with most of this but china aren't know for being particularly interested in human rights and freedom of speech/press. And don't whatabout me on the state of affairs in USA. USA and china both suck at human rights but I (I might be ignorant) think that the US in its totality still is better
I can't imagine any reasonable person having anything other than an unfavourable reaction to a petty, callow, thin-skinned, vindictive, childish, willfully ignorant and delusional narcissist and to the country that put him in charge.
That China and Xi benefit from that is really just a happenstance. Virtually any world leader and the country they lead are going to look good by comparison.
Low bar
I mean no surprise if you spend your time threatening your "allies" and fucking up the world, etc....
I mean how could they not? I mean even if you strip away everything else, there's at least the level of respect for competence. That clearly exists in one but not in the other.
China might be an evil regime hell bent on silencing any form of dissent, but at least its a consistent one.
And they produce solar panels that's allowing many small countries to use electricity in the oil crisis
All for the huge price of 40% of the worlds emissions. Don't worry its surely going to stop growing this time surely.
From 14% to 44% in Canada between 2023 and 2026, that's particularly dramatic
Right now China is the lesser evil of the two. Doesn't make China less bad than it was before.
Sounds about right.
Xi is thousands time better than trump. And he has more support of chinese public than trump has of americans, again busting the myth of liberal democracy being deomcracies
Xi is a thousand times more diplomatic and with it than Trump for sure.
The thing is though Trump wants to create the president for life thing that Xi has going on.
So while Xi may be way better than Trump that is like saying a hemorrhoid is a thousand times better than cancer.
Lol libtards cant comprehend a leader being for long in power is actually good for stability and development. I dont want liberal election shenanigans every 4 years which only creates noise and doesnt change anything Fundamentally. Elecions are wase of time and resources
Lol what is good for stability is cancelling elections, getting in bed with the US and speed running hyper capitalism?
So much winning, billionaires are loving it.
I am defending their government structure not their economic style or diplomatic relations.
I am strictly anti dengism and staunch anti revisionist ML who doesnt support post Mao PRC.
Probably because Chinese people live in a country were criticism of the government and Xi present a high risk of jail or loss of freedom. Glhf proclaiming criticism toward the party and Xi without consequences.
I mean, the countries that absolutely hated Soviets still allied with them when Nazis became the problem. It's nothing new that "lesser evil" is seen more favorably than "dangerously deranged aggressive nazi at the helm of country full of nuclear weapons and no human willing to stop him"