this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
226 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7828 readers
673 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Miller@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Those companies are not trying to make a profit they are trying to make a cheap workforce for the rich that wont unionise or expect basic human rights.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm a little more cynical. I think the AI companies are making a fortune selling the fiction that human workers can be replaced.

Megacorps invest for the short-term gains (wage suppression via layoffs that are spun to be a positive thing) and avoids short-term losses (holdouts may lose investors because AI is hip).

[–] Miller@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

To my mind that is not more cynical, it is just a layer of grift on top, like scum. The real cynicism is the misanthropy of betting against humanity.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

It does have a demotivational effect as a threat.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

FINALLY someone gets it without me having to explain it.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is also a growing cadre of these people who, I think, truly and deeply believe Peter Thiel's hype about making a godlike super AI. Silicon Valley has been due for a religious awakening for years, and a techno-god that you can, theoretically, entreat with personally from the safety of your browser window? It's tailor-made. At the very least, I feel like a lot of them have fallen into Pascal's Wager about the whole thing, and that's enough for them to devote time and energy and the limitless money they can beg or borrow to this.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like a lot of them have fallen into Pascal's Wager about the whole thing

Funnily enough, you just described the Zizians. There's a really good 4-part series of Behind the Bastards on them if you're interested

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I'm familiar, but I think there's a lot of less extreme thought along the same lines throughout especially the C-levels and presidential classes. It's gone beyond being a selling point and started into being a full-on belief because they've been selling the lie so long.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And its clearly not working

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My concern is a mass depopulation when there are sufficient robo-slaves to take up the slack of maintaining society and producing technological progress. Although it'll likely be temporary. I'm fairly sure humans when digitized will grow in number or similarly when we start space exploration and colonization in earnest. Without FTL some faction could always just go somewhere else if they want to do society another way.

[–] fisch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay, I'm a big fan of the torment nexus myself and I'm looking forward to it being unleashed. But while we wait, can we work on paying nurses a living wage or shit like that?

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where are you? Nurses make like $150K+ here.

[–] fisch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Feel free to replace with any socio-economic problem where you live.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 month ago

I can add a few to the stack. Teachers, daycare workers, and EMT.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Tbh, we're already looking at mass depopulation by 2100. Not a lot of people are having kids nowadays

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Imo it's all for the government surveillance state. They already have terabytes upon terabytes of data, they just can't really use it. But an AI that could sift through all that shit in 5 minutes? Sounds great.

But I suppose both paths lead to AI companies getting bailed out.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They are so fixated on this that they are totally blind to that even if this were so it would remove the whole foundation of business: having customers able to pay, at all.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm convinced these richoids are actually stuck in this investment cuz they know as soon as one of them runs, the whole investment start falling apart, and given we know how far some of the bugmen will go for money, I wouldn't be supprsised if their lives are being threatened behind the scenes over it.

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

This 100% tracks.

It makes the big tech CEOs sound like the idiots on /r/wallstreetbets or /r/superstonk except luckier. I can far too easily imagine them calling each other "paper hands" behind the scenes.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their lives are threatened. The instant that the line goes down they know they're all fucked. They also know that we're all just about at the top of the hill and they can see the other side so they're all digging up.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well yah there's that, no I more-so mean they will actually kill them for 'causing' the collapse. Bowing, epstine, and a few other "suspicious circumstances" over the years, I'm would not be suprised in the least if it were true.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just waiting for that sweet, sweet bailout.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're not done digging their financial holes so they'd just spend a bailout right away and keep on digging. It's not that they got into a debt that's hard to keep up with. It's that the entire industry has no working model that covers the cost of doing business. Ed Zitron has laid this out in multiple articles and interviews (and probably on his podcast).

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All of the investors and C-suite execs are chronic gambling addicts by this point

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

C-suite hopefully got a taste of reality when OpenAI and Anthropic tried to charge token-based rates that covered their actual costs. Suddenly nobody was willing to pay and rates had to be slashed again! (I think this was all in the last month or two.) More and more enterprises will probably be downloading one of the free open-weight models and developing their own in-house setup (which would at least be more resource efficient).

[–] roboflop@feddit.uk 13 points 1 month ago

“There are no product cycles, and, aside from the still-baking superintelligent foundation model, there doesn’t seem to be any product at all,” Brandom writes. “With this pitch, [Sutskever] raised $3 billion!”

I seriously need to get in on this and grift some rich investors, I'm broke as shit dude.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's far worse than this.

All the AIbros have come from the direction of LessWrong, either directly or indirectly. They're literally AI cultists working to make the future godlike AI that's going to rule the universe.

I'm not making this up; I'm not exaggerating.

The principals in the AI space don't care about such paltry issues as "ROI" or "human beings" or any other such trivialities. They're all focused on making The AI™.

Zitron and others like him are focusing on the investors because he knows the principals are literally insane religious cultists.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yep, fucking rationalists. Insane cultists of pseudointillectualism…

[–] tenchiken@anarchist.nexus 11 points 1 month ago

Organized crime frequently would use a business to mask or funnel money through, distract from other activities, or for blackmail and extortion sources.

Wait, what were we talking about again?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think Futurism is even pretending to give a shit anymore either with their rage bait headlines about AI.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

OpenAI managed to go from Non Profit to Anti Profit.

They put the ole' flaming national money pit to shame.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Because they're washing corporate money from tax heavens.

[–] AlexNorris@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

I already know where this gonna end which is another bubble 🙃