this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
95 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

40217 readers
1057 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

1984, so that people mentioning it online will stop sounding like complete fucking idiots.

Or perhaps The Jungle; it sparked public outcry and major overhauls the last time it became popular, maybe it can work its magic again.

[–] demonmariner@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago

Hah. I'd be happy to hear that everyone read at least one book in their lifetime.

[–] fdnomad@programming.dev 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. Just the intermissions would get everyone's blood boiling.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

One of my favorite books and unfortunately lots of the story still is relevant today.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The Master and Margarita

Probably won't get as much out of it as someone who lives in the Soviet union, but it's an interesting dissection of the absurdity of authority.

[–] demonmariner@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Yup, awesome book.

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My summer reading list (not that I get to read both every year):

  • The Songs of Distant Earth, by Arthur C. Clarke
  • The Name of the Rose, by Umberto Eco

The first is about what we never prepared for, but could try to thrive through. (Mike Oldfield made a cool concept album about this. One of the songs is called "Only time will tell")

The second is a murder mystery set in a medieval monastery. But wait! Is it actually a multilayered examination of our notions about information? Oh hell yeah.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Umberto Eco has beautiful prose, I wish I knew enough Italian to read it in the original text

Grapes of Wrath is a good one that's relevant now as when it was made.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence - David Benatar

I found reading this to be quite validating of my own life experiences and observations

[–] metalsd@eviltoast.org 1 points 2 hours ago

This book is very well written but I disagreed completely with the premise. I believe is true that we don't choose to be born. We're forced into existence kicking and screaming but that's the nature of being. We are born we grow up we procreate and then we die. Some of us don't procreate by choice but I feel the desire to have offspring is innate to being alive. Some people and beings have a stronger desiree than others, and there's nothing wrong on following through and cires related to the suffering we impar into our offspring is not reason not to do it. Just like children's role is not to take care of their parents when they're old. All things considered, this is quite a philosophical debate.

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 2 points 7 hours ago

Capital and ideology by Thomas Piketty. An eye opener on wealth distribution throughout history and the arguments that held societies together to allow wealth disparity.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Socialism: Utopian and Scientific by Friedrich Engels. Short, yet clearly elaborates on the shift from earlier utopian views of socialism of figures like Robert Owen to the scientific socialism of Marx and Engels.

Honorable mentions go to Capital, Volume I by Karl Marx, Imperialism, the Current Highest Stage of Capitalism by Lenin, The Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon, and Neocolonialism, the Last Stage of Imperialism by Kwame Nkrumah. This series of books expands on capitalism during its beginning, intermediate, and imperialist phases, and imperialism itself in its beginning, intermediate, and final phases as they relate to colonialism and neocolonialism.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] metalsd@eviltoast.org 1 points 7 hours ago

This book is so beautiful and sad. Everyone should read it

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Paris in the Terror by Loomis

Describing public events and the private machinations behind them (through the participant's journals and letters), revealing how the road to hell is paved with the best of intentions.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Surface Detail by Iain M Banks

Part of The Culture series but can be read standalone, potential for being one of the best hard scifi books out there

[–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

I love this book and all his stuff, but this is not hard sci-fi at all.

Just so if anyone takes the recommendation they know what they are getting into :)

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Brothers Karamazov

Doctor Zhivago

To Kill A Mockingbird

Narnia series

Sundown Towns

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Illusions by Richard Bach, subtitled The Tale of the Reluctant Messiah. A beautiful book about the universe and spirituality. The author wrote it on the premise of "what if I had my own, personal, Jesus... Or Buddha or Messiah that was hanging out with me and explaining the universe". So this guy is a Messiah that one day just quits to fly airplanes.

It's funny, it's inspiring, it's a little sad, but hopeful. It's also very short, you can easily read it in an afternoon.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Your only obligation in any lifetime is to be true to yourself. Being true to anyone else or anything else is not only impossible, but the mark of a fake messiah. The simplest questions are the most profound. Where were you born? Where is your home? Where are you going? What are you doing? Think about these once in awhile and watch your answers change.

I love the movie theater analogy.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of fiction here so I'll go the other way and suggest "Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig Our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich--and Cheat Everybody Else" by David Cay Johnston.

https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/291700/perfectly-legal-by-david-cay-johnston/

If people aren't outraged, they aren't paying attention.

Sample:

"Once, Blattmachr devised a way that Bill Gates, the richest man in America, could reap $200 million in profits on Microsoft stock without paying the $56 million of capital gains taxes that federal law required at the time. The plan was so lucrative that Gates would not have to pay a single dollar in tax and would even be entitled to an income tax deduction of $6 million or so. And that was just the initial plan. The concept could be applied endlessly, allowing Gates to convert billions of dollars in Microsoft stock gains into cash over the years. So long as the Internal Revenue Service did not challenge the deals, then Gates could realize unlimited capital gains without the pain of taxes.

The trick was in manipulating charitable trusts, a common enough device used by generous people who own an asset, such as stock or a building that has appreciated in value. Instead of selling the asset and investing the after-tax proceeds, an individual or a married couple can donate the asset to a charitable trust that they control. The trust sells the asset tax-free and invests the proceeds, giving the donating individual or couple a lifetime income, typically 6 percent per year. When the donors die, what remains in the trust, typically half its value, goes to charity.

Blattmachr’s plan was to take back not 6 percent annually for life, but 80 percent per year for two years. Gates could have pocketed at least $192 million without paying any tax. Then the trust would fold and a charity would get the remaining sum, less than $8 million. Under the plan Gates could have converted into cash more than 96 percent of gains on the Microsoft shares he donated, not the 72 percent he was entitled to after federal capital gains taxes. The charity would get less than four cents on each donated dollar. The government would collect nothing.

The scheme even created a tax deduction that was enough to reduce Gates’s income taxes by about $2 million.

Whether Gates took advantage of such a plan is not known for sure because the law makes individual income tax records confidential. What is known is that when Blattmachr made this route available to others, it sold like a treasure map where X marks the tax-free spot. Billions of dollars of assets poured into these short-term charitable trusts and their super-rich owners took many millions of dollars of income tax deductions that further cut into the flow of revenue to the government.

The technique was so outlandish that when some other tax lawyers got their hands on the map in March 1994, they sent it to the Department of the Treasury in a plain brown envelope. That July, Treasury blocked the route to newcomers and said that it would pursue those who used the device. However, the Internal Revenue Service never announced whether it collected any of the taxes. One hint that the IRS may not have acted against those who used the technique can be found in the records of United States Tax Court, which is where taxpayers challenge the IRS. There are no Tax Court cases in which taxpayers fought for a court blessing on the device, known in taxspeak as an “accelerated charitable remainder trust.”

The Treasury rules shutting down this route to tax-free investment profits were not the end of stretching charitable trusts in ways never anticipated by Congress. So facile is Blattmachr’s mind that from those 1994 rules he divined a new route to tax-free gains. He started selling a new treasure map and billions of dollars more in capital gains passed untaxed into the bank accounts of his clients before the government blocked that second path, known in taxspeak as “son of accelerated charitable remainder trust.”

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

There’s been a lot of abuse of Trusts in finance for a while. This seems like a good recommendation.

One thing I don’t follow; if someone puts their money into a charitable trust, achieving those lighter tax rules, wouldn’t the obvious rule be that the trust could only then be spent on communal benefit, NOT withdrawn as a personal piggy bank?

It’s fine if someone wants to make an account that is given to charity in case of their death, but then pro-charity tax rules shouldn’t take effect until they die. I’m confused as to why it wouldn’t work that way.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Sounds like a loophole that was either accidentally or intentionally inserted. This book is full of them.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 48 points 23 hours ago (13 children)

The Complete Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

All of Discworld.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Feels pretty cliche to say them, but

1984, the handmaid's tale and brave new world

Should probably be on anyone's list that hasn't managed to get to them yet

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 40 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Was going to say this, many people cite it but never read. It is readable well, do it.

Also, I think Fahrenheit 451 translates far better to our situation, as I see media and social media in there long before it was even thinkable.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

1984/farenheit 451/Brave New World are the adolescent trilogy for me that anyone who wants to understand the nature of people and mechanics of power would do well to read.

I'd add Animal Farm to that as well.

As they say, Orwell didn't stop it from happening, he just postponed it by 30-40 years.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Reading isn't about any single book. Each book is a peice in a larger concept of expanding ones mind outside the small part of the world they live in. Some expand more than others. But one alone makes only a small difference.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah but what's one book everyone should read at least one in their lifetime?

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

A cake decorating book for you, today.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

None. One book alone is meaningless.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I knew I was right never to read, thanks!

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 16 hours ago
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

The awakening of intelligence by Jiddu Krishnamurti

load more comments
view more: next ›