this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
142 points (99.3% liked)

news

24849 readers
684 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Link to the article here

Article text:

Darializa Avila Chevalier, the Democratic congressional nominee endorsed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who ousted longtime Rep. Adriano Espaillat in Tuesday’s primary, maintained a since-deleted Twitter account with repeated sympathetic references to communism, Marxist ideology and Soviet figures, including Vladimir Lenin.

Avila Chevalier, a sociology PhD student whose victory sent shockwaves throughout the Democratic establishment, has been under fire for a since-deleted Twitter account, previously reported by CNN, that included phrases such as “seize the means of production,” along with calls to abolish police, prisons and borders. Other controversial tweets include one that said Black and Arab men are both “Fetishizing ugly colonizer women” and another that described wiping her dirty hands on the American flag in lieu of a napkin.

As an undergraduate, Avila Chevalier attended Columbia University, where she organized with Students for Justice in Palestine, and after graduation became involved in pro-Palestinian campus protests over Israel’s war in Gaza. She also attended a controversial October 8, 2023, pro-Palestinian rally in Times Square — one day after Hamas’ attack on Israel — that featured speeches and rhetoric praising the attack.

She previously told CNN, “I have grown considerably in the years since these tweets, and I am focused on our community and our community’s future.”

On Thursday, President Donald Trump accused Avila Chevalier of being a communist, a charge that she said she wouldn’t respond to while on MSNOW, saying, “I won’t be reactive.”

A further review of Avila Chevalier’s archived Twitter account from 2020-2022 found repeated references to communism and Marxist ideology. The account, “Darializabonet,” appears to have been deleted in June 2022.

The account’s bio read in 2020, “how communist of you.” Archived posts and retweets during this timeframe included a recommendation that Karl Marx’s Capital was an “essential must-read,” a complaint that public libraries did not carry enough Marxist literature by Lenin and other revolutionary writers, and a retweet from a Communist-identifying account lamenting that bookstore “banned books” displays did not include The Complete Works of J. V. Stalin.

One archived retweet from 2020 quoted Assata Shakur, the former Black Liberation Army member who, in 1977, was convicted in the murder of a New Jersey state trooper before later escaping prison and fleeing to Cuba. In the quote, Shakur said she “preferred Ho Chi Minh, Kim Il Sung, Che, or Fidel (Castro)” before studying Marx and Lenin because the two “white dudes” had made contributions to “revolutionary struggle” that were “too great to be ignored.”

In April 2020, Avila Chevalier shared a post lamenting that people wouldn’t accept communism over a lack of varieties of soup – a reference to the critique that the political system leads to fewer consumer choices.

“I just cannot get over the fact that the universe has foisted upon us the perfect illustration of literally every failing of capitalism and people are still like we can’t be communists cuz there won’t be enough types of soup,” the post she retweeted read.

Other posts critiqued or joked about popular culture she viewed as anti-communist.

In one post, Avila Chevalier described the animated film Anastasia as “an explicitly anti-USSR kid’s movie,” and in another post she linked to she wrote: “Time for me to once again sympathize with the people the Bolsheviks put in the blender for like 90 min 😌.”

Avila Chevalier was responding to a viral false claim that Disney had removed Anastasia from Disney+ streaming service because it was anti-Russia after the invasion of Ukraine.

In another post, Avila Chevalier joked that Sheryl Crow’s hit song Soak Up the Sun was “bootstrap capitalist propaganda” after noticing it opens with the lyric “my friend the communist,” quipping that the character was “apparently also a bad organizer lol.”

Another 2020 retweet argued for democratic worker control of wealth, dismissing ideological labels by concluding: “You can call that communism, you can call it socialism, you can call it pancakes.”

And previously, CNN had surfaced an April 2020 post where Avila-Chevalier said that while most of the political theory she had read was communist, “the pyromania associated with anarchism is very intriguing to me,” punctuating the remark with a laughing emoji.

Ok I’ll say it: these posts are hilarious. Our first lefty shitposter congressperson

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 49 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Years ago I was reading some "is China really communist?" argument and ran across the following point:

Whatever you think about the current character of the Chinese government, everyone there openly says they're communist, reads a bunch of communist literature, names their main party "communist," etc. If they aren't communist, it's hard to imagine a better not-already-communist place for an actual communist to rise to power.

Something similar applies to the DSA.

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I love the quote but don’t know exactly what your point is.

Do you mean that communists can rise up through the DSA, or that the communists within DSA might as well call themselves communist, or something else?

[–] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The point about China is that even if you don't believe they're Real Communists, they at least all act the part, so a Real Communist could rise through the ranks more easily there than in most other places. Say you're a Real Communist in France or Mexico, for example. If you openly talk about Lenin, or the dictatorship of the proletariat, or how labor creates all value, you're going to have big chunks of the political sphere openly call for you to be exiled from political life, if not worse. A Real Communist will not get that pushback in China, because there everyone is at least pretending to endorse those ideas, so Real Communists have comparatively easy paths to power.

In the DSA, everyone is at least pretending to subscribe to socialism. It's right there in the name! So while someone who really believes that might struggle in other parties, or in the broader U.S. political sphere, they're going to get comparatively less attacks from the right in the DSA.

I don't know anything about this lady. I'm saying that if there was a pretty cool politican out there, it would be easier to succeed rising through the DSA than anywhere else in the U.S.

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

Got it! Then I completely agree

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just about everyone I've met through the DSA has been a self described marxist

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

The most active cadre tend to be far more often Marxist than paper members

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

I can introduce you to some DSA anti-Marxists if you'd like lol

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In my experience, most critics (not all) are chronically online people who have never organized their community a day in their life.

Most of my chapter is MLs. Please let us know when the revolution is 😎

[–] free_casc@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I said in another post that harcorest marxistest lenisistest maoistest party in my area should have some sort of positive relationship with our local DSA, since if DSA is truly doomed to fuck up at some point due to their electoral tendencies, you'll want to recruit everyone who is ready to step things up at that time. Obviously organize (far) beyond that, but calling people a bit to the right of you "liberal liberal liberal" is cutting off the pipeline that's going to be very useful in the future just to be smug.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hot damn, I do love the smell of CNN panik!! in the morning.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 month ago

Youtube comments on that post was filled with "okay and?"

Marxist-Lenin posts beats the hell out of the usual Epstein-Maxwell-AIPAC messaging most Washington pols try to hide. I did note that she deleted the whole account not just selected messages. Not being a Nazi collaborator by using Twitter is a good thing. I'll let this one slide as I'm sure she'll have plenty of chances to disappoint me later.

[–] LeonTreatsky@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

I only vote red specter

[–] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Time for me to once again sympathize with the people the Bolsheviks put in the blender for like 90 min 😌.

michael-laugh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (16 children)

She sounds good, hopefully she still holds these views. Can't think of anything that could have changed her in that time period tbh.

Whether she can actually use the position to achieve anything is another story though. There's also the issue that no matter what your views are you're constrained in what can be done by what can keep you in the seat too.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Sorry, but unless those Tweets are undeleted I'm going to assume AOCification.

Crypto-communism is something made up by red scare propaganda, in reality we can't keep our mouths shut. "The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims." If she really still believes these things, she won't try to pretend she doesn't.

[–] mar_k@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago

I don't think she even deleted individual tweets, she deleted her whole account after Elon bought twitter bc she wanted to get off the nazi platform

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

If deleting the posts is the difference between a genuine Marxist-Leninist getting elected into a position of power vs not, then deleting posts is good.

Big online-is-not-real-life moment here. Keeping a shitposting Twitter account is not doing more praxis than like… having a meaningful say in whether your state is able to more effectively facilitate a genocide

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims etc etc. If she really still believes these things, she won’t try to pretend she doesn’t.

I see your point, but making undeleting her tweets as a sign of her true radicalism is a real "Tell me you think posting is praxis without telling me that you think posting is praxis" kind of cringe.

The reality of the situation is that she's running for elected office, and that requires cleaning up your image, especially in the internet age. And quite frankly, Any ML running for office should be using it as an opportunity to teach the masses. The masses shouldn't be learning about Marxism from a Fox News host frothing at the mouth over your dank Lenin meme.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Didn't Rosa Luxemburg have a quote about socialists being forced to deradicalize when participating in bourgeois governments or something like that? (Sorry I can't seem to find it) I saw it used with regards to Mamdani, I have a feeling the same thing might happen again

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

i hope she pronounces Chevalier with a hardcore francophone accent so the monolingual anglos can be extra mad about how it isn't pronounced Chevrolet nor does it sound like any other word they know like Cheeseburger or Chewable Aspirin.

i'm hoping for Sheh-VAL-yeay but like the "L" is lightly danced over, nearly imperceptible and all the syllables smear into each other.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago (4 children)

To be fair aoc never represented herself in any way they showed an understanding of Marxism, yet alone referencing any revolutionaries or really saying anything leftist ever. She was only ever doing the "I'm a socialist bc socialism is when the government does stuff" bit

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

good grief you people will find a way to whine about anything

[–] hollowmines@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago (4 children)

the level of ambient doomerism on hexbear of late has been on the rise for sure. even just the ability to enjoy a tiny W for what it is seems to be beyond most posters

[–] Inui@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Personally, I'm in "wait and see" mode. Like, cool, I hope they follow through. It's only very recently that the radical factions have gained this amount of influence in the DSA and they have historically been unable to enforce any sort of coherent party line, since they don't really have one as a big tent organization. So while I'm not doomposting, I think it makes sense to be skeptical.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"I hope they follow through, but let's wait and see" is distinct from the tone of "everybody is a succdem liberal and if you even hope that the DSA libs can do one single good thing you're a liberal idiot. I don't have a tangible suggested alternative BTW but definitely don't join, support, or even pay attention to the DSA liberals" that comes up every week.

I've made jokes about DSA aligned people being the vanguard or above criticism, which they aren't. I would like our community to support a balanced analysis of global politics, including US domestic policy, including criticisms of the liberal tendencies of the Democratic Socialist movement.

It is actually very straightforward to recognize that they are not sufficiently radical/revolutionary to make the substantial changes to undermine US imperialism and capitalism. Pointing that out in a snarky sentence is not interesting and is awarded no points by me. I am curious about what it leads to. How can this energy be appropriated into a stronger revolutionary movement? Is it really just sheepdogging people to the Democratic Party line? (show your work!) What alternatives can one suggest to socialists in the United States, if we dont believe the DSA can get the job done?

One element of answering these questions is definitely "wait and see". Someone can set their expectations bases on their knowledge of history, but the conditions of the United States in 2026 are definitely unique to itself.

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

For alternatives to electoralism, you can find them even in the DSA, getting droned out by electoralists on a regular basis. There is internal struggle in the DSA, a war of attrition between people smiling at each other and calling each other comrades, seeing who can exhaust the other first on driving a political line and making their priorities into org priorities.

Sometimes (often?) people frame actions add purely mutually exclusive. Either you're doing electoralism and nothing else or something else and definitely not electoralism, so it goes. There is an element of truth to this in that an org has finite human hours with which to do work and that limiting focus to a few priorities is a good way to increase impact. And even if you have 4 priorities, there is a tendency for certain kinds to suck up all of the energy or perhaps appeal to people who think it's the only thing that matters and insults everyone that disagrees. This is an long-recognized tendency. Marx called a version of this parliamentary cretinism (apologies for the problematic terminology) and it is a real thing. But with that said, it is possible to do several things at once and do them well, but it requires a willingness to be self-critical and disciplined in exact opposition to the subject of that term from Marx. That is the key that tends to go missing. DSA electoralists tend to stick to electoralism and try to do things every cycle even if they don't have ideas of what to do - it's just the thing to be doing. Sometimes they succeed, usually they fail, and for reasons that are fairly unserious. And the idea of accepting criticism or imposing discipline on "electeds" tends to be rejected by the exact people so invested in electoralism. I believe these are structural, not incidental issues - if discipline and principles are the antidote, the way to create it through structure is the thing to be doing.

Anyways there are DSA groups focused on:

  • Disability justice
  • Mutual aid
  • Labor and unions
  • Political education and events/rallies
  • Anti-imperialism with various methodologies
  • Various "horizontalist" projects like community farms and so on
  • much more

But they don't make national news because it isn't flashy. And of course other orgs engage in plenty of alternatives to constant electoralism.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's all doomerism and assuming bad faith on the part of every other user (except for infamously bad faith users)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (25 children)

I get the hesitancy but

In one post, Avila Chevalier described the animated film Anastasia as “an explicitly anti-USSR kid’s movie,” and in another post she linked to she wrote: “Time for me to once again sympathize with the people the Bolsheviks put in the blender for like 90 min 😌.”

I’m sorry AOC was NEVER saying this and saying she prefers to read about Juche instead of Marx lmfao

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First Left-twitter poster that may become a congressmember

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

She’s not losing that district to a Republican in November let’s be real. This issue matters realistically to almost nobody. People already knew they were voting for somebody at least using the label “socialist”

[–] Dyno@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

If an elected official in the US did come out and say "yea, I'm a Marxist, fuck you gonna do about it", wouldn't there be red scare-era mechanisms in place to remove such officials and have them sent to Gitmo?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago
[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago
[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In one post, Avila Chevalier described the animated film Anastasia as “an explicitly anti-USSR kid’s movie,”

I love her.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

What an amazingly badass name. Can't wait to see the jimmies she rustles.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Archived posts and retweets during this timeframe included a recommendation that Karl Marx’s Capital was an “essential must-read,” a complaint that public libraries did not carry enough Marxist literature by Lenin and other revolutionary writers, and a retweet from a Communist-identifying account lamenting that bookstore “banned books” displays did not include The Complete Works of J. V. Stalin.

Honestly, same girl, same.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

i dunno if this is nominative determinism at play but I formerly welcome our first Shitposting

Knight of the Order of Lenin

load more comments
view more: next ›