this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
114 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11467 readers
600 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

This is where the DIY electronics hobbyist scene in the EU dies.

Good going corpos, you win. I'll just consume your media and goon at home.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

e-commerce in Europe is laughably bad no wonder people are turning to Temu and China and abroad in general. It's either Amazon or outdated brick stores with their own archaic tech that works sometimes, and surprises you with a couple extra fees every single checkout.

The only redemption right now is Shopify rollout for boosting small shops which is hard to mess up but even that is being overtaken by scam spam.

The service is just so bad that people will wait 2 weeks for potentially dangerous products and deal with customs just to save cup of coffee worth of money. The service is the issue not anything else.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Look at who funded and lobbied for this, this isn't about protecting EU manufacturing, most of these companies manufacture their goods outside the EU and charge exorbitant prices for them.

This is once again taking the power out of the proles hands.

Parent Corporate Member Key Retail Brands & Subsidiaries Annual Revenue
Schwarz Group Lidl, Kaufland, PreZero €185.6 Billion
REWE Group BILLA, REWE, Penny, Toom Baumarkt, BIPA €100.4 Billion
Ahold Delhaize Albert Heijn, Delhaize, Alfa Beta, Mega Image, Maxi, Albert €92.35 Billion
Carrefour Group Carrefour, Carrefour Market, Express, AtacadΓ£o, Cora, Match €91.48 Billion
Tesco PLC Tesco, Tesco Express, One Stop €82 Billion
Inditex Zara, Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius €36 Billion
H&M Group H&M, COS, Monki, Weekday, & Other Stories, ARKET €21 Billion
Colruyt Group Colruyt, Okay, Spar €11.19 Billion

Credit to https://www.reddit.com/user/Interesting_Pie_319/ for the data.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Aliexpress/comments/1ugpyoe/i_dug_around_a_bit_and_found_exactly_who_is/

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

The difference is that these companies have to adhere to EU regulations, e.g. on harmful chemicals. Cheap Chinese products famously do not, often times to an absurd degree, exceeding limits by thousands of times.

Then regulate the products and impose fines?

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago

and not forget sites like temu burn money to sell this stuff cheap while these have to actually run a profitable business. But 100 Billion Alibaba and 50 Billion Temu are the good guys in this, i guess

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can they put an exclusion for electronic components? 90% of the shit isn't manufactured in the EU and local companies buy it from China and charge you 10x the price.

Mouser isn't a bad option

[–] fyffes@feddit.org 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Important bit of information: China gets subsidised parcel fee under an agreement of the World Post Association. They pay less for postage than European businesses shipping within the continent.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why is this not changed? Why all these additional taxes and hoops when they could simply cancels these subsidies?

[–] kossa@feddit.org 3 points 15 hours ago

They're implicit subsidies.

So here it goes: there's an international treaty saying basically "if a letter from your country is delivered in my contry, I'll deliver it for free and vice versa". So, you pay your national post some "international handling" so they e.g. deliver it to China, but in China the national post is now responsible for distribution and last mile for free, they don't see a part of your postage.

So it's subsidized now by the Chinese post basically: they only charge cents for "international shipping" to their citizens and businesses, last mile is handled for free from the local national post offices.

That system obviously was designed to work frictionless and easy in a time, where there was no globalized market to speak of.

It's not so easy to reform and just cancel it might be a disadvantage as well: then all your other mailing stuff needs renegotiating as well. Just imagine the horror in canceling the treaty, and then you need to sit down with dealmaker Trump who sees an opportunity in order to get the US Post to handle your mail 😱

It's managed by the Universal Postal Union, which is part of the UN, and the organisation has been in effect in one form or another since 1874 with 192 members currently. International treaties between so many countries are extremely difficult to reform. It's much easier to make a new treaty than reform an existing one because there are so many vested interests in the current system.

In this case, the subsidy is designed to help developing countries have fair access to the global post system. But when it was created, it was likely not envisioned that a developing country might become a rich country, nor that the postal system would become such an important part of e-commerce.

[–] fyffes@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Good question. I guess you have to ask those responsible.

easier to add a new agreement than cancel an old i guess. treaties are hard

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've wondered for years how they manage free shipping for all the small shit.

I'm guessing it just goes on flights that would be going anyway, probably filling in gaps where larger packages don't fit which would just be empty anyway.

No clue what agreements they have with the carriers to let them do that for dirt cheap, but it's the only thing that makes sense.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only people that can import cheap Chinese stuff are corporations... don't you dare bypassing their money making schemes

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, that’s a very naive and uninformed viewpoint. The EU is being flooding with 100s of millions of packages with value-free SHEIN and temu stuff, the delivery services even do not know how to handle it anymore. It is a tremendous danger for local industry, it is very bad for the environment. Do some online research, you will be impressed with the impact of these cheap products literally flooding into the European Union.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aren't those same cheap products coming in through corporations that sell it under some brand at triple the cost?

[–] fyffes@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's not the same stuff, though. A lot of these products do not fulfill any product safety law. There have been lots tests of random products sold on these platforms, showing that many are unsafe and/or dangerous (just google). A business sourcing from China has to ensure that sold products are safe and fulfill legal requirements. And yes, for this "service" they charge higher prices, and sometimes even unjustifiedly.

[–] Itizaj@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

But you will still be able to buy such products, but with an additional 3 euros, I don't see anything changing in terms of safety

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Right in the article they cite the analysis has numbers on a few groups of products like protrction equipment, makeup, and whether they pass EU standards. 60%-something do not. That also means 30%-something pass EU standards. That's a lot of quality cheap product. Of course as a consumer you can't tell whether you're getting something from the 35% pile or the 65% one. But that doesn't detract from the point of a lot of the cheap stuff in the category is the same stuff when it comes to EU standards.

Here's an anecdote - years ago I really wanted a magnetic USB cable. Being skeptical of AliExpress stuff, especially electrical, I found a North American brans called Volta. Bought a cable. Cost me CAD $20 or $30. Some time after, I was browsing AliExpress for some specialty ebike parts that aren't imported in Canada, I took a look at the magnetic cables they got. After a few pages of results I found a suspiciously similar cable to the Volta sold by the manufacturer itself. $3-4 for a set with a few magnetic tips. Ordered one. Once it came, I meticulously compared it to the Volta. It was identical in every way. It even failed in the same weak spot after a couple of years of use as the Volta. So yeah, while not everything is the same, not everything is not the same either.

Side note - the AliExpress prices are not the low prices available in other cheaper retailers in China. Stuff on AliExpress already has significant markups. Volta did not pay $3-4 for that cable. They prolly paid $0.50-1 even if that much. They made exorbitant profit.

[–] DireTech@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

USB cables are actually a great example of where finding a brand with a good name does matter. Lots of cheap cables don’t properly follow the spec and then people end up frying their steam deck or other hardware.

It’s not so bad for data transfer but a real issue when you’re using them for supplying more power for computers or other expensive devices.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] master94ga@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Should be specified that is not specific to Chinese imports, it's to any import from any country outside of EU

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kinda seems like a tax on the poor for being unable to afford better products.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't get better products. You get products without safety testing, warranty or support. Clothes from some eastern brands have high amounts of chemicals that are forbidden in Europe because they cause cancer or infertility. Some type of escooter was banned in the UK some years ago because the dodgy electronics where responsible for multiple house fires. Iot devices or computers from some no name brand won't get updates if a hacker finds exploits to mine Bitcoins on it, or spy on you and capture your logins from your cheap temu wifi router.

[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You should reread their comment, you agree with each other.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 4 points 22 hours ago

You are right, sorry. I did not have my coffee yet.

[–] gabelstapler@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the meantime Chinese companies built warehouses in Europe, which are importing the cheap goods en grosse. You're buying from a Chinese supplier, but the parcel is sent out from Europe.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Much more easy to regulate those. That's kind of the point.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

In the meantime Chinese companies built warehouses in Europe, which are importing the cheap goods en grosse.

They probably weren't, at least for the things being described here, as the article is talking about de minimis.

The de minimis exception basically let low-value packages through without paying import tariffs.

There's some reason to do that


it'd be more expensive to process the (many) low-value packages.

However, this also meant that if someone imported something in small, low-value amounts, they didn't have to pay import tariffs, whereas people doing bulk imports did.

This was a major reason for the explosion of Chinese online retailers in the West, like Temu. They'd sell something that was shipped directly from China, which meant that they didn't need to pay import tariffs on it. Traditional importers would import a large batch and would need to pay import tariffs, and then distribute the large batch from within the country in question, which penalized traditional retail.

[–] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (25 children)

on the principle that's fine, but it also means that DHL will add ~~6.50€~~ 7.50€ fees on top of that here in germany, which you can only pay in cash upon delivery, and they don't even carry change.

edit: it's 7.50

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not in Germany but DHL has a website where I can pay any fees. They usually text me a link when I have a package on the way.

It's kinda bullshit that I had to pay a $17 service fee when the import fees were only $3, but at least they accepted digital payment...

[–] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Germany is its own beast. For the longest time i couldn't pay electronically at the post office because they only accepted EC, and no Visa/Mastercard/Apple Pay. with my french bank i don't have that, so i had to bring cash always.

this is the kind of e-mail i get when i have a delivery with customs fee:

edit: and the most funny thing was that the amount in the e-mail wasn't even correct, so now i have my vat of coins i collect in a drawer to adjust to the final surprise amount that needs to be paid :>

Your DHL shipment will be delivered to you today by your mail and package carrier.

The import duties in the amount of €25.67 (including a €7.50 handling fee and the VAT included therein) are to be paid in cash upon delivery, with exact change if possible.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's so annoying. Is this the peak of German efficiency and bureaucracy?

[–] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 14 hours ago

no no they can do much worse xD

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 16 hours ago

They recently added the ability to pay with an EC card upon delivery.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί