It's kind of funny to see all the hate for a company built on rebooting old stories for a modern audience getting flack for continuing to reboot old stories for a new generation. Are y'all just angry that it's "your" childhood nostalgia that's no longer profitable or popular with the literal kids these days?
Disney's not even the only one to do it, people tend to love that shit and examples abound of your favorite nostalgia IP not being the original telling of a story. No denying that Disney's choices here are entirely profit driven. But pretending like this is a new thing Disney is only doing to your generation's nostalgia is disingenuous at best. Maybe just judge the reboots the way we judge cover songs or genre "standards". Whose going to fault Johnny Cash for covering NIN? Or Nina Simone performing a song also sung by Billie Holiday, Sarah Vaughn, and countless others? Do they add something? Do they re-work it into their own style? Reevaluate elements? Re-frame perspectives? Adapt problematic historical culture pastiches and norms for a modern moral perspective? Maybe they just fix the pacing of a story for a new audience or a new medium. The Lord of the Rings trilogy was by no means original, not even the first movie to be made made on the story, but nobody faults it for that. Same with Dune. Same with literally and stage production before the invention of motion pictures.
DISCLAIMER: This statement is in no way meant to be, nor should it be interpreted as, an endorsement of any of Disney's business practices past, present, or future. This new movie might be shit, but it won't be because it's a story that's been told before.
