this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
296 points (94.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69573 readers
214 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I bought Plex pass years ago for £79. The new price of $749.99 is INSANE.

No wonder all the cool people are using Jellyfin.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] matzler@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I mean, yeah that's crazy, but jellyfin does have a proper audio player yet? Plexamp is just way too good and the main reason I'm not switching..

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean? there are so many audio clients that can can connect to jellyfin. finamp, jellyamp, sonixd, .... What is it you're missing in a jellyfin audioplayer?

[–] matzler@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Hmm, does finamp or any of those give me recommendations, sonic similarities, adaptive streaming, downloading, mood/genre playlists etc? The not so polished frontend I can neglect.. Unfortunately I got really used to plexamp and am spoiled in some way

[–] hacktheegg@programming.dev -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The jellyfin audio player is soo bad, I used it less than a week ago and the music was almost unrecognisable from playing it through copyparty

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What the heck are you doing, doesn't every single player just... play the music? How could the quality be worse?? I can imagine having gripes about the UI of some players, but the quality??

[–] hacktheegg@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

from what i can tell jellyfin normalises/dampens all the audio it plays through its official frontends, and i will admit normally it isnt as grainy as it was, but idk how it got messed up so badly when going to my client (official android app)

luckily from what i could tell it was only one-off, and i dont believe it would happen with a non-official viewer/listener cause it was most likely something during transcoding the cache

[–] Enzy@feddit.nu 1 points 6 days ago

I use Emby. Works great.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago

Φορ 479 usd you by a coffee machine or something else. I got off plex and went for jellyfin. I only watch from home.

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 76 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Been on jellyfin since day one. Works fine, UI is great and gets the job done. TV UI maybe not top notch, buy usable. Mobile UI just fine and usable.

Also, exposed on the internet (reverse proxy, OIDC, https the works) for years now with zero issues whatsoever as well .

There are a few users always throwing thrash on jellyfin, maybe pissed off users that paid for Plex, or Plex shills that like to denigrate jellyfin, I don't know.

Just ignore them.

Jellyfin is perfectly usable, yes you need to setup port forward, VPN or whatever, but it's exactly our target audience so move along and stop bitching, Plex shills.

Stay with Plex, use jellyfin, whatever fit your bill.

Anyway plex does not fit my concept of self hosting to be free from cloud lock ins.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

If you're on Android TV (I guess Fire TV works as well), try out Wholphin. It's miles ahead of the official TV app. Also, Findroid works great on mobile.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I tried Plex once, before I knew about jellyfin. I just wanted an open-source self-hostable media server with my own media.

When I tried it, after installing Plex, I was presented with a login for a Plex hosted account. Iirc that was optional and I skipped it, after that came the nags for Plex pass. Piss off. That's exactly the opposite of what I wanted out of something like jellyfin.

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago (24 children)

Oh yeah and apparently you can't stream remotely without a subscription either? If it were a feature they had to spend time on I'd still not want to use it, but I'd understand at least.

From the application's point of view, there is no difference between internet and intranet access. I just saw that downloading the media you already own, using your own infrastructure, requires an even more expensive subscription.

How tf did people stick around with this shit for so long.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rudee@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Was any justification provided for a nearly 10x price increase!?

Glad I started with Jellyfin

[–] dan@upvote.au 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

It's because lifetime licenses aren't sustainable. I'm surprised they still offer it.

Plex is an actual company that has an office and employees, so they have recurring costs every month. A lot of people already have lifetime licenses that they're not likely to receive any more revenue from. It's likely they're increasing the price to help recoup costs or convince people to subscribe to a monthly subscription rather than get a lifetime license.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 13 points 1 week ago

Nah, they increased the cost to drive people to the monthly subscription. I'm guessing in a year or two they'll announce the lifetime subs have been revoked and everyone needs a monthly sub.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago (9 children)

who is this for?

those unicorn users who make 150k++ a year and pirate all their media and then wanna share it with their friends that they don't have?

[–] TheDuke@europe.pub 6 points 6 days ago

I don't think there is an actual target for this price. But I bet my left testicle it's to push for subscription passes instead of a single purchase.

[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

travelling salesmen who pirate all their media??

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I do wonder if this is a last ditch effort cash grab before they go under or a "we really thought we'd be acquired by now so now we have to plan ahead" move.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know that wouldn't be the last time they try to get money out of you, either.

[–] homes@piefed.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

After 16 years of having a lifetime pass (and nearly 20 years of administering multiple Plex servers), I know this to be false. And, unless you have one yourself, you could not possibly know. Especially because, with a lifetime pass, there’s no other way that could possibly ask for money from a user. It’s literally impossible.

But, if I’m wrong, show proof of your lifetime pass, and the solicitous emails you received subsequently. I know you can’t.

If you’re going to speak from such obvious ignorance, it should be easy to admit when you’re wrong

Most Lemmy users, however, never find such a thing so easy…

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I think it's more that they're implying the company is likely to get worse in the future and start trying shit, not what they've already experienced. The price now being nearly 10x what it once was is a pretty big red flag, after all.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Lifetime single pay subscriptions don’t make financial sense at all for a company. As much as I hate subscriptions, it’s the only way to get long term support, which software needs.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If Jellyfin can fill most Plex features for most people, maybe it’s not that they need to charge money to survive. Maybe it’s that their product value proposition has eroded.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Certainly, but open source projects rely too heavily on the goodwill of volunteers who still need to feed their families. Hopefully Jellyfin’s incoming users contribute to the project.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

jellyfin: hey here i am you can have me for free. i even run on your own server.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Jellyfin is always free, works great, and keeps getting better!

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

I like jellyfin

load more comments
view more: next ›