this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
844 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

15930 readers
1159 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
844
Thoughts? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by fireweed@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
 

Image description:


Text: Amazon's electric cargo bikes have arrived in DC.

Image: A four-wheeled vehicle that appears to be a cross between a bicycle, a go-cart, and a mini-truck

Response text from high t alpha shemale @gluetaster: that's not a cargo bike man that's a loopholemobile

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

The "Deutsche Post" uses bicycles to deliver the mail. I see nothing wrong with an e-bike to deliver parcels.

[–] replicat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

What a great way to make everything worse.

[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 hours ago

Pretty sure all that bullshit is so they can use bike lanes, hence the helmet

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

The shit us Americans will do to not just fucking use Kei trucks like the rest of the world.

[–] Felis_Catus_Domesticus@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

We have blacks picking cotton for free in the prison-industrial complex of the deep south and parts of the midwest. As Americans we have this thing for slavery and subservience. The optics of things. I guess at some unconscious level we just want to see the rickshaw come back in some big, highly visible way.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Kei trucks can't legally travel in bike lanes.

and bicycles have ~ $0 registration overhead wherever they are operated.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Aren't these still a whole heck of a lot better than cars?

[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 hours ago

For the environment, yes, but Amazon are doing it to avoid licensing, vehicle registration, and insurance costs, and putting workers at higher risk while doing so.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yes... on roads.

It really depends though if their weight per wheel surface area is higher than a car per surface area it could still cause more damage to roads and using these on bike paths not designed to support motor vehicles (such as mulch paths) will likely destroy those paths.

They're also a visibility hazard. Bike paths aren't designed in roadways to have an 8x5 visual obstruction in them. This could endanger cyclists, pedestrians and drivers due to visual obstruction (which is already a problem with giant trucks and SUVs). You could mitigate this by requiring them to have like a blinking yellow light like we do for oversized highway traffic.

As far as climate, environmental and oil pollution. These are probably pretty good. They aren't going to generate the level of toxic runoff and air pollution ICE cars will.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Capitalism, uh, finds a way.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Capitalism finds a loophole.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 7 hours ago

I would love to see those taking over the streets, but I would hate to see them in the bike lane.

[–] JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch 8 points 9 hours ago

Ngl, I kinda want to get one to transform into a camping trailer. Become a traveling tea monk.

[–] mech@feddit.org 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] kungfuratte@feddit.org 26 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

We have quite a few companies in Germany using similar vehicles in cities (I can't compare the sizes here). All in all it's a positive development. Maybe in this case it's a way to utilize a legislative loophole, but even then I would say: The loopholed law has a positive impact if the new vehicles are smaller and more energy efficient than the ones they replace.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I think the larger issue is that most places in the US just don’t have bike lanes at all, and the coverage even in major cities is pretty spotty. So routinely bikes end up on sidewalks to keep from getting run down by F-150s. Legally bikes are allowed on all non-highway roads here and have the same rights as cars, but as my grandma used to say “they’ll put that you had the right of way on your tombstone”.

So these things will end up driving on sidewalks. And then people will want local governments to ban bikes from sidewalks and enforce those bans harshly, so bikes will have to enter mixed traffic on busy streets with no bike lanes, and less people will bike because don’t want to risk getting plastered by a pickup, and then the existing bike lanes will get ripped out because not enough people are biking to justify them.

Like, medium sized vehicles like this are great, but, the bike infrastructure just isn’t ready for them here. Better off using a Kei truck for the same type of work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vepr_jako_pepr@slrpnk.net 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

thats so funny, they cant include a steering wheel and the driver has to performatively rotate their legs :DD

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Ahh, I now understand the need for max 250w motor. Also hope a judge can be real, use his head, and just say: "nope, not a bike" .. bi-cycle, isn't that word from two wheels?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago

tricycles are a thing. there are even legitamate quadricycles

[–] kuerbiskernoel@feddit.org 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Actual cargo bikes (the ones people use all the time to bring their children to kindergarten etc that are actually good and reduce traffic a lot) often have 3 wheels (2 at the front where the cargo space is, 1 at the back)

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Then it is by definition not a bicycle. It's called a tricycle.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 hours ago

😅 if only language was that simple

load more comments
view more: next ›