JustTesting

One thing I always wonder is if it actually could end poverty 22 times over.

i mean, rich people hoarding money is increasing moneys scarcity for everyone else, theoretically increasing its value. And if it were suddenly distibuted fairly, it'd lose value and there would be a higher cut off for what's considered poverty. on the other hand, a lot of their money is funny money, like being tied up in stocks and not actually worth as much in currency compared to what is said (if they sold the stock, the value would drop and they'd get less).

so i'm actually curious if anyone ever did an analysis of what would happen if e.g. the wealth of the top 0.1% is evenly spread across the population.

of course that's super complex and hard to say what the social effects would be. But the simplistic 'everyone would get x dollars, poverty limit is y, x > y, so no more poverty', while useful to show the scale, always sounded too naive to me.

Plus kids will find a way. Our english teacher didn't want us to say 'shit', but to use 'sugar' instead.

There was a lot of 'bullsugar' and similar in that class.

In general, anything that hijacks search shortcuts.

Oh you wanted to search for text on this one page? Let me show you a search bar for the whole website instead, with a search that's strictly worse than the search engine that you came from in the first place.

Maybe a third of a used or import lathe or mill.

Machining is super expensive as a hobby to get started.

Which is why I'm slowly upgrading my cheap CNC router to be more rigid and capable, bit by bit. Machined stainles for the first time last week. though i'll never get close to a 'real' machine, in hobby machining, everything is a finishing pass…

I only see two comments here with 1 downvote each, and those are by separate people. but maybe i don't see what you see because of federation issues?

This can work, but with cryptography instead of the porn site connecting to a government service.

The swiss government wanted to introduce electronic id a few years back which was a complete clusterfuck, every party would get all your private data even if they just needed 'older than 18', it was supposed to be implemented by various private companies that then sell it to the individual states, not really with gov oversight, so you have like 20 companies all with all the data, each of which could be hacked at any point etc.

we forced a public vote on it in 2021 and rejected it with 65%.

the use cases are pretty valid, like online pharmacies, ordering booze online, though of course you never know what they would require it for in the future.

so now it's 2025 and a new proposal, this time much more privacy focused, developed by the government, open source, seems like they did listen to a lot of the criticism.

this blogpost goes into a bit of details on why unlinkability matters and that one-time-pads are one potential solution. And the whitepaper with more detail.

i saw a presentation from the digital society on it earlier this year and from what i remember, you get a set of keys (and can create new ones if you run out) from which you can create derived keys that only contain relevant information. The other party can verify this directly, without a gov service. And since you use a new key each time, the porn site also cant crossreference with your booze site that you're the same person, that kind of stuff. It all sounded pretty reasonable and like it would adress your points.

A pet clone is like 50k, I don't think cloning a human is technically more challenging, so 50k plus hush money?

Not that that is necessary, you could just get anyones urine.

I was musing with friends recently that there's no way that there's no billionaires with illegal clones that they pretend are regular kids already. I mean the tech bro billionaires would eat that shit up once they hear that it's technically feasible. And Musk is the likeliest idiot to do it imo.

Ist natürlich auch blöd, wenn dann die hauptsächlich aus Rentnern bestehende Gemeindeversammlung entscheidet, den Steuerfuss zu senken und gleichzeitig an der gleichen Versammlung Millionen für Rollstuhlgerechte Fahrstühle ausgibt, wie hier vor ein paar Monaten.

Also die Fahrstühle sind ne gute Sache aber dann noch Steuerfuss senken, sich gegen bezahlbare Wohnungen aussprechen (man hat ja sein Haus) und bei Schulen Container oder die billigste Offerte für hässliche Betonklotzschulen ohne richtigen Pausenplatz annehmen usw.

Wär natürlich nett, wenn mehr jüngere Leute an der Gemeindeversammlung wären, aber Dienstags von 19-23Uhr Zeit machen mit Job und Kindern ist deutlich schwieriger als als Rentner.

I'm super happy with my formbot Marathon IDEX, works perfectly fine with TPU (though i did have to adjust one screw guide in the extruder so it doesn't eat the filament). it's not very well known, since they don't hand them out to influencers etc. The discord is pretty active and lots of helpful people there.

made with all standard components, regular Klipper firmware, so i know i can replace parts if anything ever breaks.

And IDEX in mirror/copy mode for printing multiple parts at twice the speed is great when you need it.

Selling fewer explosive vehicles seems like a good idea tbh.

While I agree it is overvalued, what really put it into perspective for me is that all of the known gold in the world would fit into a cube with a side length of 20-25m.

So a fair price would be lower than what it is now, but it is scarce and its uses (corrosion resistance, conductivity, malleability, reflectivity, etc.) probably would still warrant a relatively high price.

I wonder a bit in how far the opposite is the plan. Like Klarna recently firing support staff for AI and then wanting to hire them back, but as gig workers.

A company laying off thousands of engineers wont be nice for the stock. Saying you're doing it because you'll replace them with awesome AI might even pump the stock and is an easy excuse.

if you can the hire them back cheaper later because the job market is shit because many devs lost their job, even better.

It just reminds of this case from the 30s where a factory owner replaced skilled workers that wanted to unionize with machines and unskilled workers. The quality was worse and they produced less in a given time, and the machines were scrapped 3 years later. But it stopped unionization dead in its tracks and skilled workers got lower salaries afterward, so it all worked out even though the machines were strictly worse.