this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
782 points (98.4% liked)

me_irl

7843 readers
2752 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Airfried@piefed.social 119 points 5 days ago (33 children)

Kinda dumb for rich people to brag about education when education is directly tied to wealth.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'm sorry, but you should be fucking ashamed to take a handout when you're a goddamned multimillionaire, music star, and movie star. Not a millionaire once and just barely (if taxes don't go up and you don't have a medical emergency), but many millions of dollars. Fucking pathetic.

I'd respect her more if her kids got into school because she paid for two new libraries. At least then someone would benefit.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago

We should be ashamed for giving Lopez the light of day on this site - Shit like this is how Reddit got shittier. I survived over 17 years on that gods-forsaken website and have seen its slow decline. Posts like these were a part of it.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

Or if they earned the scholarship (good target to set for your kids) and she then funded two more to replace them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 75 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's a flex. In a society that fools itself into thinking it is a meritocracy, people who buy privilege still think that means they are intrinsically worthy and amazing. Scholarship is thought to portray that the individual is so intelligent (or good at sports) that the university is ready to give up thousands in income to have that candidate.

Scholarships are not meant for the filthy peasants who need them, that would be like giving feebies to the undeserving freeloaders. Instead it should be given to those gifted and capable individuals who could afford an expensive private education.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 31 points 4 days ago

Those universities are gambling thousands of current-revenue tuition dollars on millions of future-revenue philanthropy. The odds are good on a J-Lo level prospect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago

“Resist”

Pays Musk for Blue Checkmark

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Anyone remember that whole "athletic scholarship" scandal from a few years back, then Doctor Dre was bragging about his daughter getting into USC on her own...until someone pointed out he just donated millions of dollars to the school....

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago

that whole “athletic scholarship” scandal from a few years back

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varsity_Blues_scandal#Fabrication_of_sports_credentials

Athletic scholarships are legitimate. The scandal was that someone was bribing coaches to falsely identify athletic recruits.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Rich people get richer while the poor stay poor. Yes they do, yes they do.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I would ask why they would even apply? Have you no honor; you are stinking rich, there is no possible situation where you would need the scholarship...so why even apply.

The only way that this works in my head is if these are the initial recipients of a new perpetual scholarship from the "Lopez foundation" or similar. Thus paying it forward for generations; rather than just a rich person pissing contest saying look my kids with the best tutors in the world beat out everyone else for another scholarship.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When I went to college one of the forms I filled out applied me to a whole bunch of scholarships. Some I very much wasn't qualified for. I assume they had a better high school counselor than I did and did something similar. Your last point is generally how non means tested scholarships work.

[–] JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

When I did the dance, my counselor had enough scholarships and grants to pay my ride... Second month of classes my financials went tits up and for my field trip to the offices we found out the two big ones had an overlap issue and please sign here for student loans. Fuck the system.

[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Some parents won’t pay for their children’s schooling on principle. I’ve known a few people who come from wealthy families but they didn’t get any financial support for college/university

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Free and equal access to education should be a basic right and cornerstone of every society.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Yeah, but 'Murica isn't a civilised country

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

"Mom, seriously, it was a post about us going to college. Did you have to do a model pose and have your belly sticking out."

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why does it look like someone photoshopped in a picture of J Lo's face?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I think it is a photoshop. The level of jpeg makes it harder to see, but there's some back lighting that only affects J Lo's hair, no signs of it on either twin. Also, her jaw line looks like it was pasted poorly and the lighting on the front of her face looks off (though that could just be makeup).

Edit: Hard to say for sure, though, as that back lighting does match the window behind her and I'm not sure specular highlights would even show up in that black hair. Plus, skintone aside, the lighting on the front looks correct and wouldn't be easy to do. Someone getting that right wouldn't then miss the specular highlight on her hair (or found a source pic where someone else was blocking a similar light).

But the jpeg artifacting looks kinda more pronounced on her face, too. But not wildly so.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Yea, the jpeg artifacting is what stood out to me. Like "damn, why is her face more jpeg than the entire rest of the image combined". It stands out like she has some filter to trick facial recognition AI making her face slightly blurry but the rest of the picture is basically fine.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Yea, the jpeg artifacting is what stood out to me. Like "damn, why is her face more jpeg than the entire rest of the image combined". It stands out like she has some filter to trick facial recognition AI making her face slightly blurry but the rest of the picture is basically fine.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

time to support my sons- better make sure everybody knows i still have abs

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

Nope. Scholarships are awards based on academic performance. Bursaries are needs-based funding without a performance requirement.

If you want to change that, you have to change the system of ear-marked private donations. Most scholarships are set up by wealthy private donors with very specific requirements for the student to meet.

[–] s1ndr0m3@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Public universities used to be tuition free. The government funded universities. Now it just underwrites student loans. The wealthy private donors prefer the current system because their donations give them wage slaves. They also get the added benefit of having their name on a university building.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

In a sane country education is not only free, but students are provided with a small basic stipend from the government with the option of very favorable loans if needed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago

The J-Lo Scholarship of Excellence.

Criteria: Be J-Los kids. Go to college.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In academia, scholarships are often treated like academic awards, and academics will often list them in the same section on their CVs.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That’s because they are awarded based on academic performance, not by financial need, for anyone else wondering. Honoring academic performance is the whole point of them.

The fact that the world’s initial reaction is “they don’t deserve it because they don’t need the money” is more of an indictment of the cost of higher education than it is of how scholarships are awarded.

Also, they have “scholarships” based on financial need, they are called Bursaries.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

I wouldn't say honour is the whole point. I think its a way to ensure young people are able to afford the opportunity, and to convince talented students to attend that particular school.

But, yeah, they're for academic achievement, not academic achievement _and_having poor parents.

Better to fight for free education than against young people getting awarded for doing well in school.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 9 points 4 days ago

If they did that the rich kid would whine until there were no scholarships anymore, Means testing is generally a bad idea because, for one thing, it usually costs more to regulate than would've been spent to keep giving out freely.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is there an objective way to measure how much just the fact that they are J.Lo's kids affected this result? I am not talking about having more opportunities and better education because they are wealthy. Curious about just the raw power of the name itself. Back when I was in uni years, I have seen many instances of extremely high quality candidates getting rejections from five such applications that it made me think for "normal" people, even after you satisfy certain requirements, chance is still a big factor.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago

At places like Princeton, Harvard, or USC, a big chunk of what most people are paying for is access to a bunch of young rich kids while they are intoxicated and emotionally open.

You can make really strong bonds with people in college, and being able to promote that children of prominent rich people attend your college is a value-add for the university far beyond the discounted tuition.

So this doesn't give me any particular clue about the intelligence or diligence of these kids.

It would be hilarious if they were all community colleges that accept all applicants though. 😆

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GhostFace@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago

Even if she didn't bribe anyone or throw her weight around just being related to her still influences it a lot.

But at least she's supportive. The amount of parents that think their kids can make it on their own is stupid and it's just not right. Being smart and getting good scores isn't enough on its own.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Im wondering if she's paying anything for her teens to go at all or she plans for them to figure it out or something.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think the reality is that these admissions and scholarship committees were well aware these were the Lopez offspring. And I imagine they're counting on getting more money back in future donations and from extra buzz and interest generated if these celebrities actually matriculate.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 4 days ago

Exactly, the colleges were competing to get those kids. Maybe J-Lo shows up to events, hit her up for fund-raising, etc., then those Nepo-Babies go on to have lucrative Hollywood careers, and they can cut checks on the regular.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hey, she's Jenny, Jenny from the block. She used to have a little, now she has a lot. No matter where she goes, she knows where she came from.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›