this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
782 points (98.4% liked)
me_irl
7843 readers
3440 users here now
All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why does it look like someone photoshopped in a picture of J Lo's face?
I think it is a photoshop. The level of jpeg makes it harder to see, but there's some back lighting that only affects J Lo's hair, no signs of it on either twin. Also, her jaw line looks like it was pasted poorly and the lighting on the front of her face looks off (though that could just be makeup).
Edit: Hard to say for sure, though, as that back lighting does match the window behind her and I'm not sure specular highlights would even show up in that black hair. Plus, skintone aside, the lighting on the front looks correct and wouldn't be easy to do. Someone getting that right wouldn't then miss the specular highlight on her hair (or found a source pic where someone else was blocking a similar light).
But the jpeg artifacting looks kinda more pronounced on her face, too. But not wildly so.
Yea, the jpeg artifacting is what stood out to me. Like "damn, why is her face more jpeg than the entire rest of the image combined". It stands out like she has some filter to trick facial recognition AI making her face slightly blurry but the rest of the picture is basically fine.
Yea, the jpeg artifacting is what stood out to me. Like "damn, why is her face more jpeg than the entire rest of the image combined". It stands out like she has some filter to trick facial recognition AI making her face slightly blurry but the rest of the picture is basically fine.