this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

politics

30003 readers
2118 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The party may reclaim the US House and even Senate, but primary candidates are far from united on how to move forward

Across the country, in front yards and on main streets, at dairy breakfasts and inside breweries, voters are delivering a similar message to Democratic primary candidates: they’re tired of both parties, and sick of being ignored.

The Democratic party brand is bruised after its disastrous 2024 presidential loss. A botched review of the defeat by the Democratic National Committee, and a drawn-out process over releasing the so-called autopsy, created another round of handwringing over the party’s direction.

On doorsteps, though, the voters don’t bring up the autopsy, or the party’s brand, according to candidates nationwide. They want a party that will stand up to Trump, fight for their healthcare and housing, make life more affordable, rein in immigration agents, build up their schools, get the US out of war and lower gas prices, protect their jobs from AI, confront the climate crisis and prevent datacenters from coming in.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

How about being recognizable as a united opposition to all things MAGA and Trump? How about having a strong stand about curbing foreign influence on the political parties and elections?

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you tried actually doing something? Shit I'll take performative action out on the streets at this point instead of sitting on your comfy houses and offices just throwing up your hands going "I can't do anything until midterms and only if we win".

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

Exactly this!

It is ridiculous that no one has filed articles of impeachment yet. Yes, I know you don't have the votes. So it will fail. Then you do it again. And again. And again. And keep doing it. Show us that you tried. It fucking MATTERS.

Congress is literally the ONLY recourse we have to oust these criminals, and they're sitting around with their thumbs up their asses.

FUCKING DO YOUR JOB.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do what the voter wants. Give them what they need and stop worshiping death and destruction.

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

But the money....

If I hire these campaign managers, they say I can take money from rich people, put advertising on tv channels and Facebook through their friends marketing firm and totally get elected with poll driven messaging through their other friends polling firms. The AI created billboards and mailers totally move independent voters towards weaksauce slogans and drive the vote towards... not showing up on voting day.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Rein in corporations. Hold them to account and stop giving them the benefit of the doubt. Stop treating them as “job creators”. Shut them out of decision making and force them to actually compete.

That’s an uncomfortable position to take but it’s part of the fight voters want from them. They don’t just want a fight against trump, they want a fight against everyone enabling him and gleefully taking advantage of the chaos he’s creating.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Make lobbying, PACs, and all the other financial ways outside governments and corporations influence politics with money illegal. Till the gravy train is cut, Washington will always be awash with grifters looking to get rich at any cost. No meaningful change will hold as long as influence peddling is legal.

[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

The great part of this option is that it's super easy to do. Literally a "do nothing and win" move.

[–] scops@reddthat.com 25 points 2 days ago

Stop treating corporations as your fucking constituents. Delaware notwithstanding

[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This and disempower AIPAC, get fascist foreign politics out of domestic affairs.

Fuck corporate oligarchy, fuck all colonizer fascism everywhere, fuck state sponsored terrorism everywhere.

Take a fucking stand, end Citizen's United, abolish AIPAC and corporate lobbyists, repair our tax system to dismantle billionaires and fund true social programs; universal healthcare and housing are human rights.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Clean food, water and air are also human rights.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are, or they should be. But the US and Israel refused to sign the UN declaration of universal human rights. We just dont believe in human rights I guess.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago
[–] normalentrance@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Democrats serve corporations. Corporations value stability and laws that benefit them. Democrats want to deliver for them and keep things stable while maximizing corporate donations.

Maga Republicans serve the oligarchs. They want to be able to run scams and prop up a new ruling class. They are doing chaotic things to maximize short term profits for themselves while consuming natural resources as quickly as possible.

They both serve aipac with their seemingly unlimited amount of money.

The root of all evil n politics is money, and also it is what keeps the political machine running.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Ban owning stocks and enforce divesting in all branches!

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Represent your fucking voters, not your donors. It's 1 simple trick to win any race right now.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I cant even remember the last democratic party win. Even a small one.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ACA was kind of a big deal even if it wasn't enough.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It really was. 2010 was a good year.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No problem.

Amplify Bernie Sanders, Mamdani, and AOC, punt Schumer.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want someone who’s pissed off and willing to put their money where their mouth is. I don’t want games, strongly worded letters, pointless victories. I want actual action and holding people culpable if they break the law. I want to feel like they care for people without billions. That integrity is important. I want them to tell Israel to fuck off. I want them to worry about things like housing, food, student debt. I want them to want to reign in if not outright dismantle ICE, punish bad cops, dismantle Citizens United. I want them to support age/term limits for all politicians including SCOTUS.

I doubt I’m alone in this.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People want the Dems to CRUSH MAGA, and purge it from our government and our society. They are corrupt traitors, and represent the Epstein Class, and nobody else.

If the Dems manage to recapture the White House and Congress, and they don't do something to harshly punish MAGAs for their crimes, then we deserve to lose this country.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

Framing it as driving out the Epstein Class would accomplish the same objective, and clean up the Democratic Party a bit too.

~ Intelligent USAmericans in 2021.

Like, I know I'm cynical as fuck. This is why. Watching Trump get reelected robbed me of all respect for humanity.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

They will replace Schumer with another version of him like they did with Jeffries

They weigh how to win back voters and regain power without dropping support for Israel or supporting actual progressive policies

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You see those two people in your party? Yeah Bernie and AOC? Fucking listen to them!

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Watch any one of their "Fight The Oligarchy" tours in red districts and it's clear that the problem isn't that these districts are inherently unwinnable. The whole reason Trump sweeped in 2016 and got such loyalty is because he promised to fix problems that Democrats wouldn't acknowledge.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of those "problems" are not problems: trans people, immigrants, DEI, "woke," etc.

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Yes and No. Yes I agree scapegoating is immoral and also not productive. No his rhetoric (combined with that of pro-MAGA content) wasn't solely fixated on destroying lives of people for funsies.

The immigrants he accused of "stealing your jobs". People of color were allegedly hogging healthcare and houses. "DEI" keeps white men from getting jobs. "Woke" made men lonely. Trans people were corrupting kids and doing "sex change operations in schools". yadda yadda. It's all nonsense to us, but it's compelling nonsense to the USA population, and I think we ought to reiterate why.

Leftists have solutions to these issues, too—largely based on the knowledge that the scarcity is artificial. Single-payer healthcare; clawing back homes from private equity; worker protections and unemployment safety nets; third spaces for socialization...

[–] ProdigiousInsanity@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The reason he won was voter fraud, I'm sure of it. Miraculously, millions of straight ticket Dems vote for Trump? Also musk " knows those voting machines better than anyone"

I really wanted to believe that, and I clung to that hope for months after the election. I don't believe it any longer. With the way Kamala instantly conceded, and the fact that the Dems were overseeing the election.

Also consider the lack of a widespread resistance. In the face of boots-on-the-ground fascism marching through the streets, the anti-Trump coalition has had less than 100 people actually act in opposition to this regime. The anti-mask protests did more in defiance of day-to-day life in America than anyone and anything left of MAGA. Sure there are many voices complaining, but again that could be a loud minority.

As much as the Democrats and their allies want to make this seem like Trump's wins are a fluke, the environment just doesn't show it. Yes, there are blue folks, and according to the US election a bit under half of the country opposed Donald Trump in 2024. If the polls were rigged to any significant degree, MAGA would have had riots before they could get their "Alligator Auschwitz" built, or any other concentration camps; and you wouldn't have Flock surveillance cameras erected across the nation.

Of course there are some fighting back; but we are a minority right now. The majority of Americans simply do not care about their fellow citizens enough to defy the government in any way. Hell, I'd argue the majority of Americans do not care about their citizens or their environment. Blame social media, or the political incompetency, or "chemicals in the water"—whatever the reason, it's evident every day.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Maybe they could, I dunno, be sincerely what they've been pretending to be for decades. You know, like the Republicans are doing now.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

My question for the Democratic leadership is: Why can't they find any decent candidates? Seriously: the Senate race against Susan Collins ought to be a Dem gimmie, and the best they can do is Graham Platner? I don't even care if the dude is fully reformed and now a shining beacon of progressivism, there's literally millions of alternatives without questionable histories. Where are all these angry pro-social, anti-war, climate enthusiasts when it's time to put in the work to run against some Republican shitbird?

Where are all the Zihran Mamdanis and Kat Abughazalehs? Why wouldn't Dan Osborn run as a Democrat?

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you want the real answer to that question, look no further than the guest list for Dick Cheney's funeral.

It's the same reason the supreme court is stacked the way it is, Rowe wasn't codified, and there always seems to be a Manchin, Sinema, or Fetterman there to throw a wrench into the gears.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago

I would be willing to forgive someone for attending Cheneys funeral if they showed up drunk as hell, 40 of Billy Dee in hand, and treating the death of that monster like the celebration it should’ve been.

This would’ve also been acceptable behavior for Kissingers funeral

It's because they don't want any candidates that want to make actual changes, they want to perpetuate the status quo. So radicals get filtered and slandered until no one is left who can fight back. The only time someone else gets through is when they can capture enough public attention that the Dems can't smear them out of the running.

Or that's what it looks like from the outside. I haven't lived in the US in years, so maybe I'm way off nowadays.

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Well, given that the DNC backed an Independent candidate over Zohran Mamdani through the actual election, I think the question the DNC is asking is not "how do we find another Mamdani" but "how did we let Mamdani win?".

"b-but we need unity. stop berating the democrats-" No. Between that New York race and the years of stonewalling progressives; and the complete lack of any party leadership in the last year and a half.
What about the blatant funneling of "dark money" funds into Chorus, an attempt by the Democrats to hijack the trusted online media landscape that they'd shunned through Biden's term.

The Democrats are perfectly consent with all of this terrorism. As another comment noted, they exist to provide stability for corporations. As such, the Dems have spent the last year-and-a-half helping sheep the USA into fascism. They don't care about our rights. They care that we stay calm, especially in situations where being calm is unnatural and destructive.

Don't get me wrong: There are good "Democrats" (AOC, Chris Murphy, Ilhan Omar...), and I will still vote for them; and Representative Thomas Massie was a man with more character than at least half of the Democratic Party's politicians, despite membership in the Republican Party of Epstein and fascism. There is always nuance, and there are always outliers. What I do not want is for people to trust Democratic leadership. The only party I trust at this point is the Working Families Party; the coalition which rallied for Mamdani's NYC mayoral victory against the strongest voices of the Democratic Party. Of course, his opponent being a mass-murdering sexual predator helped, too; which begs the question of why the DNC would support a mass-murdering sexual predator.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But when he won, all his Corporate Establishment DINO critics showed up at his Inauguration, and grinned like they'd been on board the entire time, basking in his glow.

"Oh, is this what it feels like to win? It's nice, I like it. We should do this more often."

This always gets me fuming. This party did everything to stop this guy, and then they want to share the cake when they were impeding in every step of baking it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Because that's not who the Democrats represent.... They don't want progressive policies, they want to preserve existing power structures and norms. In any other society, or to anyone who has fucking eyes; this is called conservatism. In America conservatives are cartoon level bat shit crazy fucking lunatics, so it's easy to mistake Democrat conservatism for progressivism.

No matter who wins the mid terms, nothing donnie2shits did will be undone, and no policies will be reversed. Rights will not be restored to those that have lost them and the dems will accuse you of "magical thinking" for expecting change to be possible

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 2 days ago

Right, right, that's why they fail to stop supporting things voters detest.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

What took them so fucking long?

load more comments
view more: next ›