this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

politics

30003 readers
2126 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The party may reclaim the US House and even Senate, but primary candidates are far from united on how to move forward

Across the country, in front yards and on main streets, at dairy breakfasts and inside breweries, voters are delivering a similar message to Democratic primary candidates: they’re tired of both parties, and sick of being ignored.

The Democratic party brand is bruised after its disastrous 2024 presidential loss. A botched review of the defeat by the Democratic National Committee, and a drawn-out process over releasing the so-called autopsy, created another round of handwringing over the party’s direction.

On doorsteps, though, the voters don’t bring up the autopsy, or the party’s brand, according to candidates nationwide. They want a party that will stand up to Trump, fight for their healthcare and housing, make life more affordable, rein in immigration agents, build up their schools, get the US out of war and lower gas prices, protect their jobs from AI, confront the climate crisis and prevent datacenters from coming in.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You see those two people in your party? Yeah Bernie and AOC? Fucking listen to them!

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Watch any one of their "Fight The Oligarchy" tours in red districts and it's clear that the problem isn't that these districts are inherently unwinnable. The whole reason Trump sweeped in 2016 and got such loyalty is because he promised to fix problems that Democrats wouldn't acknowledge.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of those "problems" are not problems: trans people, immigrants, DEI, "woke," etc.

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yes and No. Yes I agree scapegoating is immoral and also not productive. No his rhetoric (combined with that of pro-MAGA content) wasn't solely fixated on destroying lives of people for funsies.

The immigrants he accused of "stealing your jobs". People of color were allegedly hogging healthcare and houses. "DEI" keeps white men from getting jobs. "Woke" made men lonely. Trans people were corrupting kids and doing "sex change operations in schools". yadda yadda. It's all nonsense to us, but it's compelling nonsense to the USA population, and I think we ought to reiterate why.

Leftists have solutions to these issues, too—largely based on the knowledge that the scarcity is artificial. Single-payer healthcare; clawing back homes from private equity; worker protections and unemployment safety nets; third spaces for socialization...

[–] ProdigiousInsanity@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The reason he won was voter fraud, I'm sure of it. Miraculously, millions of straight ticket Dems vote for Trump? Also musk " knows those voting machines better than anyone"

I really wanted to believe that, and I clung to that hope for months after the election. I don't believe it any longer. With the way Kamala instantly conceded, and the fact that the Dems were overseeing the election.

Also consider the lack of a widespread resistance. In the face of boots-on-the-ground fascism marching through the streets, the anti-Trump coalition has had less than 100 people actually act in opposition to this regime. The anti-mask protests did more in defiance of day-to-day life in America than anyone and anything left of MAGA. Sure there are many voices complaining, but again that could be a loud minority.

As much as the Democrats and their allies want to make this seem like Trump's wins are a fluke, the environment just doesn't show it. Yes, there are blue folks, and according to the US election a bit under half of the country opposed Donald Trump in 2024. If the polls were rigged to any significant degree, MAGA would have had riots before they could get their "Alligator Auschwitz" built, or any other concentration camps; and you wouldn't have Flock surveillance cameras erected across the nation.

Of course there are some fighting back; but we are a minority right now. The majority of Americans simply do not care about their fellow citizens enough to defy the government in any way. Hell, I'd argue the majority of Americans do not care about their citizens or their environment. Blame social media, or the political incompetency, or "chemicals in the water"—whatever the reason, it's evident every day.