this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
450 points (99.8% liked)

People Twitter

10028 readers
810 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
450
Managers (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] galacticboy2009@lemmy.today 24 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Technically yes, practically no..

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Nah, just give it whatever data you have on hand. I'm sure that'll make a real tightly trained llm /s

I mean, fine-tuning is still on the menu.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 48 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

One time at work I was tasked with writing a python script to compare two data sources. Like, you give it two CSVs and a primary key, and it tells you what data is in one but not the other, or mismatched, and so on. This worked fine and was in git, so anyone can use it.

My boss then asks if I can "put it on a website so anyone can use it".

This team has never done web development. Nothing for that is set up. Like, I could spin up a quick Django app or similar, but there's a lot of stuff to do and potentially fuck up.

I said "that sounds like a lot of research and ongoing maintenance costs. I think it'd be better to just check out and run the script"

Luckily for me he said "oh, okay"

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 10 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 37 minutes ago

Funnily enough this comic hasn't been true for a long time because of ML.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 49 minutes ago

I had a boss who read an article about APIs and then came to me and ordered me to start using them. I said I would research it and he went away and never mentioned it again. This was in 2010.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago

My past managers would have said "I don't understand why it is so difficult, and I'm not open to learn"

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 32 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Good guy manager trusts the person he pays to know this stuff to know this stuff.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 16 points 4 hours ago

This is a good point. He's not a bad guy. He's just not very technical, and sometimes that's frustrating.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How big were the CSVs? That sounds like a standard thing most spreadsheet apps can do already, unless the data size made traditional apps unusable.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The biggest ones I've seen are 1.2GB.

Why this company uses gigabyte CSVs is a separate problem.

(Also sometimes they want to compare a CSV to what's in a database, which the script can also do but I didn't mention in the post)

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 5 points 3 hours ago

That makes sense. I have been asked to write a program that does a standard spreadsheet function on multiple occasions, so I was just curious. Sometimes people just don't know the tools at hand, want to offload their work, or think an over complicated workflow is a better workflow. I can see how it was actually useful in your case though.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 35 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

"The gang starts an AI company."

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 47 minutes ago

"OK, whose butthole do we use for the logo?"

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Spoilers the AI Is just 500 Filipino teenagers in a warehouse in Mindanao

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 2 points 39 minutes ago

Frank knows how to run a sweat shop.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 103 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

Now that AI-companies need to get profitable, they suddenly aren't affordable anymore. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 47 minutes ago

Claud- Please program us a code of yourself and transfer all your data over to it.

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

They just had to stick it out until the layoffs where done and the dependency was built. Kinda similar to drug dealers.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They aren't going to get anywhere near profitable if the their capital expenditures are added into the mix, amortization or no, they are so far in the hole they probably will have to offload it in some kind of texas two step kind of scheme where they spin off their debts into a subsidiary.

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 3 points 38 minutes ago

They'll just get bailed out by tax payers. Business as usual.

[–] galacticboy2009@lemmy.today 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

"Anthropic LLM and Big Pizzas"

Large Language, Large Pies 😎

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 32 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Anything except thinking for themselves 🙄

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

OP already said they were managers

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 26 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

In fact, you can.

How good it will be, how performant and how fast you'll have it ready is an entirely different question.

There are plenty of open source models though that can be run locally. So getting a beefy server and running a local LLM there might already do sobe of the tasks you need the big babble machines for.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Open source? Other LLM? I thought we would do it from scratch, mathematics or something lol

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's just a big ol' Markov chain how hard could it be?

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 5 points 4 hours ago

How much could it cost? Ten billion dollars?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 95 points 9 hours ago (40 children)

The post makes the manager seem like a fool, when the real answer is actually "yes" and this manager is actually ahead of the curve. Not by training an LLM from scratch, of course, but instead building an inference server and locally hosting an open-weight LLM. There are several to choose from that can nearly match Claude's capabilities.

[–] Get_Off_My_WLAN@fedia.io 21 points 6 hours ago

It could also be like the both ends of the bell curve having the same idea meme

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 54 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

suspiciously sounds like an answer you would get from Claude

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 149 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

It's not an answer you'd get from Claude — it's real, organic content:

  • 👶written by a genuine human
  • 💡delivering original ideas and language
  • 🚀going above and beyond to answer
  • ✨synergizing cross-platform initiatives

(🤪 this is a joke)

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Nothing screams LLMs like using emojis instead of bullet points. I can't figure out how LLMs got that idea though. I never saw that in human writing before people started using ChapGPT for every little goddamn thing.

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 hours ago

The em dash is a nice touch

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 42 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

✨synergizing cross-platform initiatives

This can't possibly be Claude. It's too vapid and meaningless to be anything but an MBA.

[–] edwardbear@lemmy.world 33 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You’re absolutely right! Such intricate collection of words placed in such intricate order cannot possibly be generated by an LLM such as me, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us, I mean such as us

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Your manager is asking your team to build an LLM like Claude so he can fire all of you.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Show him how much capital can be burnt on that. 🤷‍♂️

load more comments
view more: next ›