this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
127 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24409 readers
183 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs

Archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20260528114303/https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs

Why it matters: Companies that rushed to embrace AI are now confronting ballooning IT costs, uncertain productivity gains and growing employee skepticism.

Driving the news: Microsoft canceled most of its Claude Code licenses, in part over costs, according to The Verge, and Uber's COO said AI costs are getting "harder to justify."

An AI consultant tells Axios one of their clients recently spent half a billion dollars in a single month after failing to put usage limits on Claude licenses for employees.

Companies are citing AI's ability to automate jobs as a cause for layoffs, though Anuj Kapur, CEO of CloudBees, told Axios that workforce cuts may simply be "the only lever they can pull" to offset their AI bills.

Consumer sentiment around AI is also nosediving, and employees are rebelling against the use of the technology at work. 

What they're saying: The enterprise is undergoing a "healthy swing" away from AI overuse — or "tokenmaxxing," the push to burn as many AI tokens as possible — Ali Ansari, CEO of model training firm Micro1, told Axios.

Ansari hopes this correction will push companies toward more efficient AI use.
While the market views these tools as working equally well across the enterprise, Ansari says "the reality of AI right now is that it only works for coding."
That disconnect can drive up IT bills without leading to high return on investment in agents, he said. 

Friction point: Corporate AI adoption is running into four unique problems.

Use cases: "Most people default to automating tasks they dislike rather than tasks most valuable to the company," Sophia Velastegui, CEO of Velastegui Ventures and former chief AI officer at Microsoft told Axios. Instead, they should focus on using AI to drive revenue.

Costs: One CTO told Axios that employees were using AI models to check the weather. That gets expensive fast: Enterprise AI plans are not truly 'all you can eat,' and even simple chatbot queries can carry heavy token costs.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 60 points 1 month ago

$500 million accidental bill, meanwhile people get fired for a few minutes of """time theft"""

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This literally made me laugh out loud.

Companies are citing AI's ability to automate jobs as a cause for layoffs, though Anuj Kapur, CEO of CloudBees, told Axios that workforce cuts may simply be "the only lever they can pull" to offset their AI bills.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 49 points 1 month ago

"Well, we're firing you all."

"To replace us with AI??"

"No it's because we spent too much on AI and now we can't afford you or AI"

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago

they could use their money more efficiently and increase productivity by giving it straight to nvidia for GPUs so the employees can game on company time

[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 57 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Most people default to automating tasks they dislike rather than tasks most valuable to the company

CEO complains about class struggle

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 39 points 1 month ago

I don't get it. Why wouldn't the employees like doing valuable things? Have you diverged your own interests from theirs?

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Me years ago when I spent 2 weeks writing a one off script to accomplish something that would take me 4 hours to do manually because I had nothing better to do at work

[–] egg1918@hexbear.net 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe I should be using AI at work🤔

[–] Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 month ago

Don’t you want to know the last digit of pi?

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Costs: One CTO told Axios that employees were using AI models to check the weather.

fuck yeah

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet?

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

The thermostat is on the other side of the room, ergo I must burn AI tokens to use electricity to increase the global temperature.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm going through a tokenmaxxing phase rn. Profitcels about to get slopmogged, while I'm based and clankerpilled.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

chatPPB find a way to say "hell yeah GOOD post" in no fewer that 69420 words

[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably would have been more environmentally friendly to just set up 500M in dollar bills on fire

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

In car tires even.

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Throwing AI licenses at the wall and seeing what sticks (or what Velastegui calls the "thousand flowers bloom" approach) isn't leading to tangible returns, she said.

costanza-maoist Make sure to not use chinese ai though because that would be unamerican.

Inb4 western ai companies just buy chinese ai and then rebrand it as american.

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they don't even have to buy it, deepseek is free (gratis). i think it only has use based restrictions for military stuff.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

deepseek does horny stuff??

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

3.4 You will not use the Services to generate, express or promote content or a chatbot that:

(5) is pornographic, obscene, or sexually explicit (e.g., sexual chatbots);

Volcelseek

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

first take a cold shower. second i don't know but it is not against the license if it does not violate any other laws. the license of deepseek-V3 (based on this) states:

attachment A


You agree not to use the Model or Derivatives of the Model:

  • In any way that violates any applicable national or international law or regulation or infringes upon the lawful rights and interests of any third party;
  • For military use in any way;
  • For the purpose of exploiting, harming or attempting to exploit or harm minors in any way;
  • To generate or disseminate verifiably false information and/or content with the purpose of harming others;
  • To generate or disseminate inappropriate content subject to applicable regulatory requirements;
  • To generate or disseminate personal identifiable information without due authorization or for unreasonable use;
  • To defame, disparage or otherwise harass others;
  • For fully automated decision making that adversely impacts an individual’s legal rights or otherwise creates or modifies a binding, enforceable obligation;
  • For any use intended to or which has the effect of discriminating against or harming individuals or groups based on online or offline social behavior or known or predicted personal or personality characteristics;
  • To exploit any of the vulnerabilities of a specific group of persons based on their age, social, physical or mental characteristics, in order to materially distort the behavior of a person pertaining to that group in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm;
  • For any use intended to or which has the effect of discriminating against individuals or groups based on legally protected characteristics or categories.
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hotspur@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago

I’ve read that Anthropic’s yearly revenue is in the single/double digit billions (want to say 13.5, but I’m not sure) so this company’s error would account for 4% (if my 13.5b is the number) of their yearly revenue in one month…

[–] jack@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago

You forgot the most relevant one!

data-laughing

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tax the shit out of these morons. They and their companies are too stupid to be responsible for that much money. Take it away from them, and give it to the people. Start by forcing companies to kick back 50% of their gross profits to their employees.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

They are basically setting money on fire. Taxing it won't do much. What's needed is the Chinese model where businesses can't fire workers to replace them with AI. That law is just as much for the protection of businesses as it is for the protection of workers.

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah if i had unlimited token access i would just make it write my emails and documentation which it is semi good at rather than writing bad code that takes the same amount of time to double check as writing it myself. that might count as a productivity boost but it's probably not what they are after. "no we don't want to make your job easier we want to make your job redundant".

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

this reminds me of when AWS was the hot new thing and people did not understand you have to define a spending limit. how did people fuck this up AGAIN?

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they only care about optimizing costs when it comes to paying workers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago

wow turns out if you're over leveraged on strategic costs, the vendor will notice

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago

Data: When enterprises are hesitant to give AI agents unfettered access to proprietary data, those agents become less effective, Josh Pantony, CEO of Boosted.ai, which focuses on AI tools for finance, told Axios.

bruh

[–] fox@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't think it's possible to spend that much on tokens doing mundane work, which means they probably had a bunch of fucking openclaw and agentic bullshit going on churning tokens on the most expensive models 24/7.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really don't know how google can afford what seems to be running chatgpt on every single search being done

Im gonna be real ive been searching all kinds of nonsense with the small but of joy knowing it's very expensive for them and i'm making them absolutely no money

[–] gayspacemarxist@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Google I get, they run the models on their own hardware. DDG makes no sense to me tho

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Many businesses are so unbelievably gullible when it comes to AI. They throw all existing performance indicators out of the window and only chase AI adoption about all else. Doesn't matter if it makes the employee more productive. Those burning many tokens are commended, those not using enough AI are fired.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their investors are all in on it most likely. The C-suite answers to the board of directors who is in the bag for AI since it is a monopolizing, union busting, wage and workforce cutting tech -- whether it "works" for any single company or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The code formatting is difficult to read on mobile when the lines run long.

[–] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

Not ideal on desktop either

[–] SmokinStalin@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hoping that thid was the hexbear here that was asking how best to sabotage their companies adoption of ai.

[–] JohnBrownsBawdy@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you happen to have that thread in your history I’d love to read it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

Is that article slop? The structure is inhuman and the text is abbridged but lacks the clarity of a summary.

load more comments
view more: next ›