Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.
Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.
Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.
Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.
~ /c/nostupidquestions
If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!
This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.
Start here...
...proceed here.
As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.
i don't think this is true.
the sin of gluttony come from the logismoi of gastrimargia, which means "madness of the stomache" and it always was about wasteful consumption of food.
the hording wealth and resources is also a sin, but the very specfic "greed"
My favorite thing about the Fediverse is bumping into people who know more than me and learning these cool new things. Thanks for sharing.
Greed is greed, which is also a sin. Gluttony specifically refers to food. You're just lying at this point, intentionally or not, you're spreading misinformation.
There are 5 specific types of gluttony, and none of them involve wealth hoarding.
Laute - This is eating costly and luxurious foods when a sandwich would tide you over. It's one thing to have a fine meal every once in a while, but it's a bit much if it's every night. The extra money spent on the finest foods your palate desires could go towards feeding someone who has nothing.
Studiose - Eating too daintily, which means you're an excessively picky eater who wastes great energy on meal preparation or pursuing delicacies. Energy that'd be more wisely used elsewhere.
Nimis - This is what people typically think of when it comes to gluttony. These are those who eat beyond the point of satiety and fullness.
Praepropere - These are those who eat at the improper time or too soon after eating an earlier meal.
Ardenter - Those who eat too eagerly and derive all of life's satisfaction from their eating experiences. I take this one too mean when they are ready to eat, eating is all they can think about.
Please stop making shit up. If you don't understand what a word means, it's ok to do some research or even just keep your mouth shut to avoid spreading misinformation.
If you've got no idea what you're talking about, it's ok to not talk.
This guy reads Aquinas.
Very interesting points, and I see your point between all five, although except maybe praepropere? while in theory i can see this helps syncronizing communities, especially people with different lives (such as families), to sit down for the same dinner ritual. But in practice I have friends and family some of whom 1) have very active lifestyles such as running to/from work, and so requires more snacks to keep stable energy levels and 2) they have different eating habits for other reasons such as avoiding the psychological effects of truly feeling hungry. In either way, we keep having shared dinner rituals, they just eat different amounts.
So i dont really see how the is a bad lifestyle or some ethical shortcoming, but just a rule to adhere to a specific social norm.
Interesting information but wtf is with that shitty attitude, acting like you're an authority on what people can talk about? Being wrong isn't lying. OP reposted something they saw elsewhere and didn't make anything up.
It's ok to talk about things, even when you're wrong about them. IMO that's the best time to talk about them because then you might realize it due to the resulting comments or conversation. Plus, belief and understanding don't work like that, where you know when it's wrong or even questionable before you say it.
The seven sins can all be boiled down to just greed.
Lust: greed for sex/love Sloth: greed for relaxation Envy: greed for other people's things Wrath: greed for violence Gluttony: greed for sustenance Pride: greed for affirmation Greed: greed for money (though avarice is a better word)
I really like the Buddhist take, the three poisons. Greed, hatred, and ignorance.
There are a lot of different ways to state each one, but damn if those don't sound like the RGB components of the varied spectrum of shit we have going on in the world.
In this context, greed refers to excessive attachment: "I want [thing], so when I can't have [thing], I suffer."
Hatred refers to excessive resistance: "I don't want [thing], so when I must have [thing], I suffer."
Ignorance refers to delusion, specifically about the origin of suffering and the means to its end. "I'm suffering because I can't have the things that I want, and I must have the things that I don't want." When really the true reason we suffer is because we're attached to the things we can't have, and we resist the things we must have.
In a broader sense, the "delusion" part is about the nature of reality itself. We expect permanence when everything is actually transient. I eat an ice cream cone, and then it's gone. I enjoy the weather, and the next day it rains. I have a friend, and then we part ways. I have a house, but without constant repairs, it decays. All loved ones will someday die. I too will some day die, and this body will decompose and become dirt. In a word, life is entropy.
So if we think the means to escape suffering is to seek pleasure and avoid pain, we'll be doomed to suffer forever. The true means to overcome suffering is to transcend pleasure and pain, to maintain equanimity throughout the cycles of samara: to feel transient pleasure without becoming attached to it, and to feel transient pain without resisting it. Only then can we overcome suffering.
While the criticisms are correct, they’re also missing the important context that historically, the sin was heavily associated with hoarding or consuming extravagant amounts while leaving others to go hungry.
Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.
Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.
That's why greed is also a sin.
In Deuteronomy 21:20 and Proverbs 23:21, it is זלל. The Gesenius Entry (lower left word) has indications of "squandering" and "profligacy" (waste). -- Wikipedia
Christian philosophers seem to insist it's concerning food. I wonder how the sin of gluttony intersects with greed and avarice.
If it really is waste every consumer is going to hell lol
People usually decide whether religious material is literal or an allegory to suit whatever point they're trying to make.
Very easy to confuse Gluttony with Greed, or Anger with Wrath. But they are each unique.
Gluttony:
https://dwightlongenecker.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-gluttony/
Greed:
https://dwightlongenecker.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-greed/
Wrath:
https://dwightlongenecker.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-wrath/
While we're on the topic:
Sloth:
https://dwightlongenecker.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-sloth/
Lust:
https://dwightlongenecker.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-lust/
Envy:
https://dwightlongenecker.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-envy/
Pride:
https://dwightlongenecker.com/seven-deadly-sins-pride/
Easy way to keep them straight:
Gilligan - Gluttony
Skipper - Wrath
Ginger - Lust
Mary Ann - Envy
Mr. Howell - Greed
Mrs. Howell - Sloth
The Professor - Pride
That'd be an easy way to remember them if Gilligan's Island was relevant, but I'd be hard-pressed to find anyone my generation (Millennial) that'd seen it. Unless there's been some sort of revival that I'm unaware of.
This should be more culturally relevant I think.
While I agree for anyone younger, Millennials may actually be a more knowledgeable group than you'd first expect. I remember it being on quite a bit during the day (looking out up, it was syndicated on TBS and TNT), and as part of the "Nick-at-Nite" lineup.
Kinda feels like the Skipper is Gluttony, AND wrath.
You look at bone skinny Gilligan and thing glutton?
Gilligan was always eating, especially when it came to Mary Ann's coconut and banana cream pies. 😉
Oh god.....I hadn't considered the rule 34 of Giligans Island....
Pretty much all the deadly sins modern christians will violate. The bible is just a suggestion book to them.
it’s okay, since they’re Christian’s they’re good people, and it’s forgiven
— what many of them think
There's a lot of the bible's scriptures that I believe are sullied by deliberate misinterpretation. Apparently that Leviticus verse was about pedophilia and not homosexuality. Which makes sense as they were probably displeased with the amount of young sex ancient Greek and Rome had.
Doesn't that overlap with greed?
Wait till you tell them homosexuality was introduced into the bible.
Ohhh, so god was a woke Islamodem Communazi socialist! /s
There are a lot of responses that this is just wrong and maybe that is true but I see merit in this. The thing with greed it is generally means wanting things one does not have where as gluttony is overindulgence in what one has. Gluttony being limited to food seems then a limitation of the ages. From my modern perspective overindulgence in anything is very similar. An opposition from moderation. Wanting for what one does not have and I sorta feel for it to be bad has to be something someone does not necessarilly need or wanting for far more than one needs feels like it could be money or land or food or cars or whatever. So is this technically wrong. I honestly do not know. But from my life experience I see it as appropriate.