this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
364 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84875 readers
3447 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 40 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

This is a company of really smart people who work really hard—coders, engineers, designers—people whose creativity and intellect is a part of their job.

Smart enough to see their work is causing massive harm on a global scale? I know we all need jobs because capitalism commodifies life, but we CAN choose where we work.

Edit to add: if these very smart people were able to land jobs at Meta, they're likely very employable elsewhere and the CHOSEto work for Meta.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

For people who have been there for a while, remember that there's almost certainly an internal propaganda campaign trying to refute any negative stories that come out about Meta. I've heard enough from people who have interacted with Meta employees to know that it's almost a cult; and when you're getting paid twice a month, it probably doesn't feel as toxic and more transactional. That probably makes it more of a frog-boiling than it would seem from the outside; even smart people can get taken in by a cult.

People who have started more recently, though, have less of an excuse.

[–] SusanoStyle@lemmy.ml 22 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Fully agree, while people losing jobs to ai is sad i have no sympathies for meta employees. They knew pretty well how insidious that company is, and as you said, they are smart enough to find a good enough job in another company.

A bit off topic, but all this ai stuff replacing so many jobs is a bit baffling to me. At least for certain jobs. It's not like in the industrial revolution where you could see tangible results in production and efficiency. Even if it come at a terrible human cost you could see the cold logic.
Here in change, they are firing good talent only to get a subpar costlier replacement. Sure there are some places where it works, but i don't believe it's yet to the scale where you would fire so many people.

I suppose the wet dreams of a future with no employees is too good to pass.

[–] vimmiewimmie@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I heard some statements that the "AI" justification is just on paper. Maybe partly because it's an easy out, and/or to keep the stick bridge looking sustainable. But that it's in reality not directly tied to any specific takeover of these individuals' work being presently or immediately taken over, and likely not efficiently either, by software. I'm not too deep into the economy so please only regard this as speculation until you can verify.

[–] SusanoStyle@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Now that you tell me, I think i have heard about that before. It does make a bit of sense, there may be some of both things to this madness. While speculation i value the observation and i will keep it mind, thank you for sharing it.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

Savings on salaries means more profit next quarter. Line must go up.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

Man that's an awful video, but I do agree with it.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It's a Golden Age for corporate execs right now - no matter how they fuck up everybody will blame it on AI.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I feel like we've been seeing AI coding doing a shit job at big corporations, i.e. Microsoft. My expectation is that the harder Meta leans into AI, the worse their products will get, and they'll start begging their employees to come back--and I hope they get the finger in response.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I work for a tech company that has an AI product (that i use and find valuable), and the execs are talking about investing more in their employees, not less. You'll never guess which. Not all AI companies are trying to automate the whole company. If you have these personnel assets, throwing that away is short sighted. You should be able to run circles around people downsizing if you just empower your employees to use AI when it actually does make sense.

Im convinced AI is like the dot com bubble, not all offerings are worth what we are being told, but for some things its the only way that makes sense anymore. By 2030, this will settle into a new normal where these laid off employees will find work in related areas that weren't possible before, and the companies that overvalued AI will take a hit.

Edit: if you downvote can you say why? Im no AI stan, I think its being mishandled all over, but I do see a few valid use cases. Id like to know if im missing something, or if people are just sick of hearing people talk about AI.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I could get into a complex and somewhat pessimistic argument over economics and the scale of the AI bubblr on top of other financial time bombs.

But instead I cast PALANTIR!

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I guess im saying im optimistic things will swing the other way, and the fallout will hurt like savings and loan or the housing crash, but people can still find a way i think to build new things that are more sustainable and more ethical and restrict the harmful stuff. AI is a wide field. Of course it the landscape is horrifying now, im just trying to do what I can to stay positive.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

Stay alive. This is likely going to get much, MUCH worse before getting better.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think you're getting downvotes because you don't quite see how the increased productivity is the mirror image of layoffs. AI doesn't have to replace people to decimate a lot of people's lives. All it has to do is make some people more productive. Firms will layoff the remainder over the headcount needed to deliver with AI. That's the promise AI companies are selling and the layoffs are already happening in junior roles that. There's absolutely no guarantee that new demand for more software product would appear in the economy which would create jobs for those people. You think there would be but that's a bet and plenty such bets have ended up with permanently deskilled and downwardly mobile parts of the population in the past.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So how does this differ from any innovation? This viewpoint feels "anti-innovation" not "anti-AI". Computers put a lot of people out of jobs, but we don't wish they would go away.

My take: I don't hate AI, I hate the AI industry.

I've worked with classic AI for a very, very long time, I was even writing sentence parsers back in the 90s. AI overall is fascinating and can do wonderful things in science, medical, and other fields, especially ML-based tools. A good example would be MRI scanning, or tools I've worked on that scan for inappropriate medication use to save lives.

Some job loss with each phase of innovation is expected, but it's this blown up "AI can do everything" without errors BS destroying way too many jobs than makes sense that kills the industry for me.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (6 children)

The difference between this and computers or any innovation and what its prior is the pace of change which determines the social cost. Few would object to innovation if the innovation replaced them as they retired from the workforce instead of forcing them to bear the social cost mid-life. A family, a community, a region that goes through serious deskilling event is't a happy place. All sorts of real measurements of misery and illness go up. So this process isn't popular and frankly it shouldn't be acceptable. The situation we find ourselves in North America, prior to the AI shift, is to a large extent the result of a string of such events. A situation where nearly half the population wants to see the other punished. AI is promising to do a massive shift and quicker than many previous events, including at the uppet end of the payscale.

So yeah, it's not the technology, the innivation. It's how our capitalist systen rolls it out. At what social cost, borne by whom, and whom reaping the upside. AI promises a fast, painful change at a time when everyone is already struggling, without welfare to soften the blow, while concetrating the benefits in fewer hands. Benefits that also translate to power, economic and political. So people rightfully reject this proposition. The tech is getting tarred with it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When does it “actually make … sense”?

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I can only say I find it useful for coding, and its way faster to ask it questions instead of searching documentation. It can read the code base, and explain it to me instead of me trying to understand the cryptic 2 and 3 letter variable names the last a hole used, in their 57 state state machine, all states just numbered, no names (why a state machine in python? Some people...) Then when I want to change something in the code that is substantial, I can ask it to write a draft that I then refine, saving keystrokes on boiler plate. It can suggest data structures and algorithms I've not yet used or heard of, and then I can learn about them, making me smarter as well.

I did this all on my own before with a lot of grep and find commands, reading python/perl/c++/tcl/git/cvs documentation. Then tracking down someone to explain the piece Im not understanding. It turns a few weeks worth of hard effort into a relaxed few days of feeling more productive.

Even just linting, I can ask it, why is this function not giving me the expected outcome (in terms that simple), and it finds the 1 off error faster than me, like in 5 sec in 500 lines of code.

Its like having someone with perfect recall that has read all of the code base, and all comp science info on the web, sitting next to me. Its not a great coder, but I can get the information i need to be the good coder I am faster than google and grep. Not using it now is like insisting that O'Reilly books (which i have read for fun in the past) are better than searching the online docs or google.

[–] wbrianwhite@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The explicit and only goal at my company is to produce 100% of code with ai. They don't care if it's crap. Neither do I.

The more you use it for coding, the worse you get at coding skills. I can feel it already. I'm not a programmer any more. I'm a manager of a hyperactive mid level developer who's overly confident and doesn't ask enough questions.

My favorite is when the ai reviewer in the pr criticizes the code the ai agent wrote. Like ok? It's trash and I don't care. Ignore and hit resolve.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What's the use case for this code? Im wondering if there's a particular industry trying to use AI this way or just your workplace.

[–] wbrianwhite@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

We're a Saas company.

It's not just us. My friend at Microsoft says it's the same there, except they have to use copilot.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Thats the goal? And you guys are like 20% there? Or you are only accepting AI code?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

AI can‘t read or write. It processes and computes data in entirely different ways than we do: Based on probability. It doesn‘t understand context at all. We‘ll see how well vibe coding holds up in due time when more of our infrastructure is vibe coded and fewer solutions are actually understood.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago

as someone who would also reach for a state machine when doing simple parsing... what's the better alternative in python?

[–] YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I also find it very useful to bounce ideas, like an interactive rubber duck. Even when it’s wrong it can help me think out loud or elaborate ideas. It’s also very useful to help me set up tests, raise and delete environments, write documentation, etc. all things that I can do on my own, it can help make implementation faster. AI can be useful when you use it like a tool. I know it can and will make mistakes, but like all tools it can help make things faster when used correctly.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

i have colleagues for that

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

In my field its common for my colleagues to not have enough experience outside of their role to provide the feedback im looking for. They help in conversation for sure, but the wide knowledge base that is available through AI is my biggest win.

That and I cant over utilize it (well at least as a rubber duck). I can bug my colleagues too much and get in their way if im too talkative.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

AI could make sense one day if it comes with UBI to compensate its social impact and if it optimizes enough processes to compensate for its ecological footprint. We are far* from this and there's nowhere enough political pressure to make it happen.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

You're assuming AI will successfully replace enough jobs to have a social impact. You're buying into the hype. I can't think of a single job it can replace.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It’s devaluating human worth in the workplace. Solid paying jobs will go away. You will still work, you just won’t live as comfortably.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

You will still work, you just won’t live as comfortably.

if you find a new job

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

I can't think of a single job it can replace.

Me either and I don't think it ever will reach that. We're already seeing diminishing returns.

The thing is it doesn't need to replace a full job. If it improves productivity by 10% then that's the number that will either lose their job or just not get hired in the first place.

I'm sure these are very worrying times for folks in college, especially computer science and the arts.

UBI seems like the only long term solution to me.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It already has a social impact on the people's whose intellectual property was pirated, the employees traumatized by nsfw filtering tasks and the reduction of white collar junior recruitment. I know some people think it's just a bubble, companies are waiting to see what happens and the job market will recover. I am doubtful of it.
My tech company is pushing us to use it so they provide the top tools. From what I have observed, I have little doubt it will replace a lot of the designing, engineering, coding and communication time. Yes, you will still need some knowledgeable person to guide and review, but less than before. Similarly to how you need less people to build a car today than you did in the 50', and even less for an electric car, because so much more is automated.
So far automation and the internet did create more better paid jobs than it destroyed, maybe it will happen with "AI" too, but I am skeptical.
Finally, in my opinion, UBI and work time reduction with equivalent quality of life is a desirable future.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My insurance provider has already replaced all of its customer service staff with AI. As I found out when I tried to ask them a question the other day. I'm changing insurance companies.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

If you're talking about the automated phone thing, they've been trying to do that since the 90s. In the past the secret "get me a human" trick was to keep mashing zero till you got a human. Today, you can just keep saying "human" or "I need to speak to a human".

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's going fully replace a LOT of jobs, and as future iterations learn more and more, it will replace even more complex jobs. You are underestimating the Ferengi's compulsion for more wealth. They will let quality slip significantly, if it means higher profits.

In a few years, they be gaslighting us that double digit unemployment is perfectly normal in a healthy, high-tech society.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] plyth@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

and reassigned another 7,000 to train AI models.

They didn't fire those who train the AI. They fired those who don't.

[–] wbrianwhite@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You.... Do see what the very next step is, right?

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Yes. Just the summary uses the wrong tense.

made thousands of engineers train their AI replacements—then fired them.

[–] 0t79JeIfK01RHyzo@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow he really reminds me of someone

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Big head from Silicon Valley!

[–] oce@jlai.lu 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Anyone has a link to the original? Couldn't find it with a basic search.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

In terms of public posts, there seems to just be Mother Jones' repost of part of the video which is embedded in the article.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Basic searches haven’t been working well for me either lately. I tried running the query through a basic AI-First Conversational Agentic Experience but it just keeps saying to stay where I am and that the police are on the way? Weird

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Thank God there are other search engines.

Bing

It's the end of the fucking world!

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

It's on Meta's chatboard, not anywhere public. I saw people on Blind discussing it, if you have access there.

load more comments
view more: next ›