769
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Maiznieks@lemmy.world 91 points 11 months ago
[-] obrenden@lemmy.world 65 points 11 months ago

With 400 lines changed over 50 files

[-] hypnotic_nerd@programming.dev 34 points 11 months ago
[-] dukk@programming.dev 17 points 11 months ago

“feat: stuff”

Guilty of this one myself.

[-] Jeremyward@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I had a commit recently that was like 2000 lines changed over 6 files. Really should have been a smaller issue.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 13 points 11 months ago

"Bits were fiddled, possibly in the right way"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dasnap@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

'Change' if I'm feeling particularly chaotic.

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 56 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Every time I commit I have to look through git diff, figure out what the hell I actually did, come up with something intelligent to say about jt, possibly split the commit into multiple commits if I changed multiple things, do some shuffling with git reset and git add...

For some reason all my personal projects are all like 4K SLoC with 50 total commits, all of which include apologies for not doing more smaller commits

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 40 points 11 months ago

There's a bigger issue than your commit message if you don't even know what you just coded and are committing.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You see, sometimes I code something, go to bed before finishing it, come back, decide not to commit because then I'd have to think of a commit message and I just want to code, start working on an unrelated feature, do that for a couple days, get distracted by life stuff and put the project down for a few weeks/months, rinse and repeat, and then I finally get around to writing a commit message because I'm about to start a huge change and I want a restore point and I'm like. Okay, it's been like 3 months since my last commit, I'm pretty sure my code can now do something it couldn't 3 months ago but come on, I can't even remember what I had for lunch last Thursday

I'm well aware this is terrible practice but I don't know how to stop doing it

[-] dukk@programming.dev 20 points 11 months ago

Commit more often. Maybe work in a different feature branch, and don’t be afraid to commit your half-working crappy code. If it’s a personal project/fork, it’s totally acceptable to commit often with bad commit names and small unfinished changes: you can always amend/squash the commits later. That’s how I tend to work: create a new branch, work on the feature, rebase and merge (fast forward, no merge commit). Also, maybe don’t jump around working on random features :P

[-] ExtraMedicated@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Jumping around to random features is how my ADHD brain works most efficiently.

[-] Slotos@feddit.nl 5 points 11 months ago

Good news, TDD is methylphenidate of software development!

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

but...but new feature shiny

Fr tho this is all excellent advice

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] akkajdh999@programming.dev 13 points 11 months ago

I just get too excited about actually implementing/fixing something (random things that I see along the way) more than commit ceremony (nobody will care about it in my project anyway other than one random guy who gave the repo a star)

[-] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 11 months ago

Nah, I'm that guy, I gave your repo a star for the effort, but I'm not reading your history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Looboer@lemm.ee 47 points 11 months ago

Just use What The Commit.

You can also create a git alias:

git config --global alias.yolo '!git add -A && git commit -m "$(curl --silent --fail https://whatthecommit.com/index.txt)"'

Now you can just type 'git yolo' to create a commit!

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 14 points 11 months ago

"Make Sure You Are Square With Your God Before Trying To Merge This"

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago
[-] hypnotic_nerd@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

Well such an informative reply! Thanks mate 👍

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aes@lemm.ee 35 points 11 months ago
[-] Johanno@feddit.de 12 points 11 months ago
[-] foxymulder@lemmy.ml 39 points 11 months ago

"patch mode" - Patch mode allows you to stage parts of a changed file, instead of the entire file. This allows you to make concise, well-crafted commits that make for an easier to read history.

[-] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago

Highly recommend throwing --patch on any git commands you're used to using. You will have the prettiest, most atomic fkn commit, I'm serious people will love you for it.

I mean many people won't care, but the quality folk will notice and approve.

[-] Johanno@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

We make a singular commit per feature.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago

I always find this hard to follow personally.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dukk@programming.dev 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] sip@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

uuuuuuuu. and you could do -m to describe the commit.

next they'll add --push/-P.

perhaps add -r for fetch/rebase then commit.

one command to rule them all! 😈

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

git commit -m “changed somethings “

git push origin master

[-] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

You forgot this --force flag.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 7 points 11 months ago

I'm too lazy, I use -f

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

For me, it was my boss gave me a programming task which he knew would take hours or a day or two... and then 15 minutes later tells me to "switch focus" and do a menial task that any of my five coworkers could do 🤦‍♂️

[-] giggling_engine@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

The usual reason would be "because coworkers"

[-] crackajack@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago

That's in any bloody workplace! Especially if there is o synergy between different teams.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

Forward three hours, me using thesaurus.com to try fit the whole gist of my change into the first line.

[-] syd@lemy.lol 9 points 11 months ago

I’m using Copilot for it right now. It works on half of the cases.

[-] mdurell@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

That's about 300% better than my average!

[-] KeepFlying@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paul@techy.news 7 points 11 months ago

do git commit -v and then just summarize the diff you have in your editor in a human readable form.

[-] KeepFlying@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Don't just summarize the content though, summarize the rationale or how things connect. I can read your diff myself to see what changed, I want to know the logical connections, the reason you did X and not Y, etc.

Or just say "stuff" and provide that context in the PR description separately, no need to overdo the commit log on a feature branch if you're using squash merges from your PR.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

P1000x this.

I can read a diff.

I need to know why.

No, a code comment isn't good enough, it's out of date after the next commit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Me trying to find ways around using the word "and" in the commit message.

[-] aes@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

git commit -m "directory_x:file_i.so: did x, y, and z; directory_x:file_ii.so: fixed t"

[-] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Oh god I feel so called out. I wish I paid more attention to my commit messages but I’m usually too busy fixing the directory structure and refactoring. Sigh.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lil@lemy.lol 5 points 11 months ago

You should not use -m, you should write commit body!

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

Why? My coworkers are barely literate and won't read anything with more than 4 or 5 words, writing a commit body would be a waste of time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
769 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

19480 readers
204 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS