this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
68 points (98.6% liked)

Plex

3097 readers
185 users here now

Welcome to Plex, a community dedicated to Plex, the media server/client solution for enjoying your media!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This company sounds like it’s in its death throes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 hours ago

The company isn’t in its death throes - the lifetime pass is.

They want everyone on subscriptions, so they’re just pricing the lifetime pass ridiculously high to discourage its purchase. If anyone does buy it they make big bucks, but if they don’t they make subscription money.

This is the type of move you pull when you know you’ve got the market cornered.

[–] becausechemistry@piefed.social 54 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Weirdest ad for Jellyfin I’ve ever seen

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's so weird though. Do they not know it exists? Do they expect their customers not to know it exists?

When your primary competition is free (and arguably better), the last thing one should think to do is raise prices.

I can only assume that some C-suites are looking at numbers and don't know what else to do but make the product more expensive.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 hour ago

Jellyfin isn’t arguably better, especially for some of tne main things people use Plex for - remote streaming and library sharing. Jellyfin pretty much doesn’t support them.

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 21 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Wow, I got the Plex pass 15 years ago for like $70.

It is absurd to see it is over $700 dollars now.

I imagine it's to discourage the purchase of plex life time. But there's something about this that is feels so bad man.

I have spun up Jellyfin to run alongside Plex and I'm ready to switch over full time in case Plex ever goes after the old life time users. You just never know with these days.

And tbh, Jellyfin is pretty awesome. It seems to run lighter and faster than Plex. Nobody should be buying a $700 pass to watch your own content.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I need to do the same thing, but how did you do it alongside Plex? Meaning, can it just point to the same library and neither Plex nor Jellyfin gets confused (because of one generating files or paths that messes up the other installation)?

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah exactly as you said. They point to the same media folder and both run at the same time. Seems to work fine for me fine.

I basically use Jellyfin when I'm at home right now and for anything remote I still use Plex.

I honestly think Jellyfin is nicer. It's faster and it isn't always shoving other libraries in my face. It just has my content the way I want and that's it.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I also have lifetime plexpass but plex has pissed me off too much with recent changes that make the experience worse. the enshittification is inevitable, so i just cut my losses and am riding the upswing of Jellyfin. It's objectively not as good yet but i have found some temporary workarounds for the biggest omissions.

[–] Carrot@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I paid $100 a handful of years ago, and it felt worth it at the time. Jellyfin has improved tremendously in that time, adding intro/outro skip, a tizen app, better collections support, and is super snappy comparatively. I thought my streaming server was to blame for the long buffer times at the start of media, but clearly not because Jellyfin starts almost as soon as the player loads in. Plex has gotten worse, more invasive, more expensive, and more sluggish since then. I'll never look back to Plex. What value they offer on top of Jellyfin's functionality (which is shrinking year by year) isn't worth the $2 per phone per month for my new users. I made the switch for ~20 family/friends, and other than the name, people only had praises for Jellyfin.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Your users don’t have to pay anything if you have a Plex pass…….

Also I doubt you have other users, externally, if you switched to jellyfin as it’s not made for that, nor should it be used for that.

[–] Carrot@lemmy.today 1 points 59 minutes ago

As far as I know they do for remote streaming on phones, if they weren't part of my server at the time they introduced the monthly remote streaming subscription. I tried to add a new user after it was introduced, and to use Plex to access content from my server on their phone they no longer had the option to pay the $5 or whatever, they had to sign up for a $2 a month subscription. I don't know if this may have been walked back in the last few months, but at the time it was true.

I don't sell access or anything like that, I've just got friends and family with access. It fluctuates, but right now it's sitting at 17 external accounts. I host on the public internet. Despite it being not recommended in general, it's actually safe to do so if proper precautions are taken. (Correct firewall settings, force https, reverse proxy, scheduled updates, etc.) There are a few extra things I do, but just those should be safe enough if your users aren't reusing passwords.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 13 hours ago

Its way too hard to make plex work without internet

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 30 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

So instead of retiring it, we’re keeping it available at a price that reflects the real, ongoing value of the software we’re committed to building and maintaining for years to come.

I left Plex because of exactly this. What exactly have they delivered lately to actual users that isn't BS cloud streaming stuff?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Well, they redesigned their mobile app so that it only works half as well as it used to. That’s quite the accomplishment!

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Psh, even I could do that!

Heads to Claude Code....

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Don't get me started on the new Roku app...

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oh god I remember that. No one asked them to and they burned a ton of money to do it, shipped buggy, and arguably the design was worse.

[–] kvenden@fosstodon.org 5 points 14 hours ago

@scrubbles @plex and all of this time since, they’ve still not put out the updated version of the Apple TV version which has been problematic for so many years with audio/video sync issues, etc.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Bought a Plex Pass when it was $100. Pretty decent at the time, much easier to get the family hooked up to that vs Jellyfin.

And every change they've made - especially adding their own completely trash streaming library - has taken value away from that pass.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 11 hours ago

Agree, I still have my $100 pass too, but it just got to the point where I couldn't justify it anymore. I got almost ten years out of that pass, I consider that good. 10 dollars a year to support their development. Then their development stopped being for server owners like me, and I knew it was sadly time to move on.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

What's the point? Better off paying for Netflix at that rate for a few years

I bought my lifetime pass years ago. But, there is no way that plex is worth more than an entire computer

[–] ushmel@piefed.world 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

Y'know, at least they invited everyone instead of just being a C-suite retreat. I guess

[–] tehciolo@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Such a fun read!

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

The problem is the "lifetime" option, they needed to just stop offering it.

The optics of making it prohibitively expensive instead is just terrible.

It used to "pay for itself" after 3.5 years, now it takes over a decade. I don't think they understand most people were buying it before (as in a decade ago) as a form of donation to a software that didn't have a good alternative.

Now that Plex is trying to become a media streamer themselves for a revenue stream, and alternatives like jellyfin exist for what made Plex popular....

They should have just sunset the "lifetime" deal

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It used to “pay for itself” after 3.5 years, now it takes over a decade.

The cynic in me says that this also means subscription pass costs will be going up in the future too. So it may again "pay for itself" after 3.5 years with a $750 price tag for lifetime

[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

if they thought the $750 price point would make them more money than $250, they would just raise the price. instead they're exploiting fomo and essentially admitting that the market has dried up but they want to continue to dangle bait for whales.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

They almost certainly don’t expect people to buy it at this price. They’re putting it out to pasture.

Give it a year or two and they’ll do an announcement that no one is purchasing lifetime licenses so they’re sunsetting the scheme altogether.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

they just want people on the monthly/yearly subscriptions.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

LOL, fuck off. I dropped plex for jellyfin as soon as they hid encoding behind a paywall and every time I see anything related I'm so glad I left them behind.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yea? What if Plex releases an awesome feature and it takes jellyfin devs a month to add? What then huh?

/s

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oh well in that case I guess I'll have to abandon my principles and throw away 750 dollars of course!

/s

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago

Hey, why do you have 2 accounts?

/s

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

There are almost no digital products that are worth a three digit price tag and this is certainly not one of those.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Hmm, I'm of two minds about this

On the one hand it's simply a ridiculous increase and pretty indefensible as a jump. Especially given that it doesn't really offer much you can't do for free with something like jellyfin

On the other hand at least they still offer a lifetime sub, crazy expensive yes, but the option is still technically there for someone who wants to use the software without subscription. Plenty of companies have gone down the sub only road, and I think we should give at least a bit of credit for them not doing the same, even though they'd clearly like to

I know audiophiles are a bit of an outlier in general, but Roon lifetime is even more IIRC!

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Holy fuck thats 10x what i paid

[–] TheHighRoad@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I don't get what the point of this is. I have never paid a cent for Plex. If I ever want to access my library remotely, I'll use something else.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 hour ago

What will you use? Because pretty much nothing else exists that is as easy and as widely supported as Plex.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

Ya, I transitioned to an always on VPN a few years ago (VPN to my house, not one of those honeypot ones) so I don't even really need it anymore. But I paid something ridiculously low years and years ago. Whatever the price was before it moved to $75.

If I were starting from scratch today, I'd just build out Jellyfin instead.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck you plex. Ditched you a long time ago and it was obviously the right choice. If anyone gets money it's Emby. Yes I know about Jellyfin but it just sucks with HDR. Totally.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

jellyfin streams HDR just fine for me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

To mpv-shim? Yeah that works but is the stupidest shit ever, sadly. Linux tho. Dunno if works fine on win without the helper.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

i honestly don't know what you're talking about. server is a container on unraid and streams to various playback devices. no helpers or anything else required.

[–] kmirl@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

We have Rokus on our TVs and ditched Plex as soon as a Jellyfin app became available

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

As long as they honor the lifetime part I'm not bothered. I bought my over a decade ago for about $25-30 on sale.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like a big risk, how many companies have there been who offered such a thing but then went under not many years later and no longer could make good on it?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 hour ago

How is it a risk? That person already has a lifetime license so there’s no risk.

load more comments
view more: next ›