I don't even begin to trust Spotify to tell me which sponsored Spotify content is only algorithmically served to me by Spotify AI, not created with it.
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
145 points (97.4% liked)
Technology
84274 readers
2976 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
In the same breath that Spotify uses to introduce Ai stuff they also introduce a prompt based Ai to create playlists. I wish there were more platforms with feature parity and that it were easier to transfer preferences and genre tastes to other platforms.
I've tried deezer briefly but it is just missing so many things that I like that Spotify has.
I don't get the appeal of Spotify. Pay monthly for music? That's crazy.
You get a much larger selection than by buying individual records, though.
It is amazing how everytime I check they dont have what I want.
I am genuinely curious what you were looking for that they didn't have. I feel like my tastes are so benign because I have never had that issue.
You really don’t get the appeal of paying for a service that provides a need? Really?
What need?
Do you think people have a need for music that is streamed but not saved from a large collection?
Need? No. But there are tons of streaming music out there and it isn't gonna cost you a dime.
So what happens if the artist is dead?
Freddie Mercury would find it difficult to maintain an active social nedia presence to prove he's human, being rather indisposed at the present.
Step 1) create an unnecessary problem
Step 2) solve said problem
Step 3) profit???
Go fuck yourselves Spotify
How did spotify create the problem of AI music becoming reality? They are basically a platform. I get disliking their business model (even if i don't share that opinion) but spotify did not create AI music generation. This is factually wrong
Google for 'perfect fit content'. Spotify was and potentially still is aggressively pushing AI content in some of their curated playlists because it's cheaper for them to play it
They 100% allowed it, even if they didn’t create it
I'm willing to bet money that they did create it.
Spotify is such a shit company. I used to get paid (peanuts) on my artist account but they raised the threshold for getting payouts so now I get nothing.
And in dark mmo world, soon there will be service to buy "Verified by Spotify" badge or account.
Wtf?? They made tons of the AI slop on their themselves!
It's virtue signaling
The two things are not in contradiction. Identifying human-generated content is essential to AI too. if you feed AI slop back to AI, their output deteriorates quickly. Not saying that it's the primary purpose of this new feature, but this is making it easier for AI to find human-generated music to train on.
Too little too late
Or just don't use Spotify
Hell yeah
What's the best alternative? It's been a while since I used any of them. I checked Tidal recently and it looked like they have an AI slop problem too.
Bandcamp and/or Navidrome.
I buy music (mostly from Bandcamp). Now I have a big library and no subscription fee.
I haven't had it be an issue with Tidal. Tidal doesn't have a strong autoplay algorithm so it tends to nudge users toward more custom curated Playlists. It has a buggy app, make it difficult to block songs or artists, and no duplicate filter which is frustrating, but I don't agree that AI slop is a very big issue currently. They seem proactive in fighting it and have always been one of the most artist friendly services.
Download your own music and set up navidrome. For music discovery, go to shows and find out about bands from the scene.
Or set up a listenbrainz.org account to get weekly recommendation playlist, check the accounts of people who listen to similar artists, and click through those addictive spider web charts that show you a bunch of artists who are similar to the one you're listening to.
There's also Rate Your Music, which I don't have an account at but it still seems pretty good.
I've always used Pandora. I don't remember exactly in what way, but it's significantly different from Spotify. I prefer it, though, but I know that's just because it's what I used first.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Picked up a dedicated audio device recently (with another few on the way!), and it feels nice to curate my own offline, add-free, algorithm-free listening experience. Having music myself his been half the fun of this, I won't be using any streaming app going forward.
It is also super adorable:
How do you discover new artists? That is the main thing keeping me from doing this.
Listen to the radio, read music news or listen to podcasts if you prefer, go to local music venues
Can you sync the music to it wirelessly?
No! Just via a USB cable.
I just got another one delivered yesterday which has a slot for an SD card, though. But tbh this is the benefit to me, it forces me to be intentional with what I load on.
Oh man, wait until you're camping craigslist ads for used DAPs (Digital audio player, fancy speak for music player)... I got my DX180 for cheap there, then picked up some grados. Decent headphones and a good audio chip is some magic shit.
Spotify? the company that ran ICE ads?
Among other questionable decisions
Wonder if this will work on the innumerable obvious covers of popular songs by no-name bands which get listed as being from the original artists. Probably not, which is why I stopped using Spotify even before so many of their other shitty moves.
And with Artist Profile Protection (currently in beta), artists now have greater control over what appears on their profile, which helps to ensure the music you see is coming from them.
From the Artist Profile Protection link:
Music has been landing on the wrong artist pages across streaming services, and the rise of easy-to-produce AI tracks has made the problem worse. That’s not the experience we want artists to have on Spotify, and that’s why we’ve made protecting artist identity a top priority for 2026. Today, we’re announcing a first-of-its-kind solution to a problem that’s affected streaming for years.
How the hell is that something that is only in beta in 2026 and not a standard feature? It's currently optional, but they better automatically opt in verified "No AI" artists if the label is going to be worth anything. There should not be AI-generated songs from randos getting attached to a "No AI" artist.
Where's my "No Autotune" label?
Interested in seeing how this will be gamed
I'll never understand Spotify. If it's such a pain in the ass why do people use it? Napster was big when I was in high school so if I find a song I like, I go download it. Sometimes it's piracy. Sometimes it's a legitimate purchase. Whichever is easiest.
Done. The end. It's mine forever.
As far as discoverability goes it helps that there have been no new music releases in the past couple of decades that I care about.
People are lazy and don't think very much. Spotify is right there.
Also enshittification: it was better to draw people in, and then they made it shittier and people stay
view more: next ›