112
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 117 points 10 months ago

That's it! I will never vote for Hunter Biden now.

[-] glitch1985@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

But his emails!

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Is he in a beaty contest or something?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Not sure if you misspelled "beauty" or if he is entering his huge hog into a beat-off contest....

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

I thought maybe he meant a Beatty contest, and I was going to give it to Ned, hands down.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 90 points 10 months ago

Roger Stone failed to pay $2M in taxes: no indictment.

Rudy Giuliani CURRENTLY owes over $500K in back taxes and is also an "addict that lives an extravagant lifestyle". Where's his indictment?

[-] MarmaladeMermaid@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

It seems that it was more than just failure to pay:

The new charges against Hunter Biden include filing a false return and tax evasion felonies, as well as misdemeanor failure to file and failure to pay.

That said, the maximum sentence for tax evasion is five years, but I don’t know how multiple counts work in this situation.

[-] SheeEttin@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

You can get the max on each count. Usually that doesn't happen, unless they didn't get more counts or higher charges to stick.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but like, they are charging him with the scheme of not failing to pay. OP pointed out others doing the same stuff.

If he did crimes, good that charges were filed. Seems a bit hypocritical but then what would really be really hypocritical is holding people to a different standard while saying everyone should have the same standard.

[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 57 points 10 months ago

That's nice. But since he wasn't elected and isn't part of the presidental cabinet why should anyone care?

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

I think the right-wing talking point is that Joe assisted Hunter with what he did, thus Joe is also a criminal, blah blah blah

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago

I mean that's certainly spicy speculation, but until there's any actual evidence of it, we all have way more important things to care about.

[-] BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago

So still no evidence against Joe? Cause frankly I could care less about whatever shenanigans his offspring get into.

[-] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

Hate to be that guy, but it's "couldn't care less". If you could care less, then that means you still care a little bit, at least

[-] BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

You're right! Sloppy on my part.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 0 points 10 months ago

I could care less which one it is.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

“I could care less… but that takes too much effort”

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 39 points 10 months ago

The charges are centered on at least $1.4 million in taxes Hunter Biden owed during between 2016 and 2019, a period where he has acknowledged struggling with addiction. The back taxes have since been paid.

So the taxes are paid? Fine him for being a fuck up and move on.

[-] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Wait so bro was a junkie all was fine. Now that he's trying to get his act back together, which is incredibly hard and painful to do. They are jumping on him, shit I wish we could all start seeing addiction as it is, not a crime but a disease.

I'm not saying that being addicted should make you immune to crimes, or that you shouldn't deal with the consequences of your own actions.

But come on... It's a disgrace, letting people with real mental problems go about without proper treatment. It's repeating the cycle. This whole persecution campaign from the republicans makes 0 sense.

He got his shit back together, wich is more then most people who ever had an addiction....it is low key impressive

[-] spudwart@spudwart.com 4 points 10 months ago

It makes perfect sense.

Republicans want to throw anyone not considered normal in prison.

And if that not-normal person is a politically advantageous target, then it's twice as sensible.

[-] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

This whole ... republicans make 0 sense

FTFY

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Do they at least have copies of his tax returns, or are the Republicans unable to find that evidence, either

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah let's see the long-form tax returns!

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

He tried to plea down to a misdemeanor charge, but the judge did not like the deal. If found guilty, he could spend years in prison, but most likely you're correct. If this were your average tax cheat, he'd be facing a small fine.

Maybe this opens the door to more rich tax cheats facing prosecution. Hunter goes to jail, why not the next one? Why not all of them? Republicans keep dancing around like they knocked down the champ, but they have abandoned the pretense that it's just not possible to prosecute the big tax cheats because they have the means to hire expensive lawyers and the connections to avoid jail time.

[-] DrBob@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 months ago

He tried to plea down to a misdemeanor charge, but the judge did not like the deal.

I don't think this is the correct framing. The judge questioned the parties (required during a deal) and found that the parties disagreed on the interpretation of the deal and exposure to additional charges (highly unusual - these agreements are typically watertight). Since there was a disagreement there was no meeting of the minds and the deal fell apart. The judges feelings have nothing to do with it.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Thanks, all I remember reading was that the judge rejected the deal, but that sounds a lot more plausible than what I said.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

With tax crimes you rarely see anyone have more than a fine, especially when they have already paid what they owe. More than likely he will be charged with a misdemeanor, be fined $25,000, and released.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 8 points 10 months ago

It's a good thing he's not holding or running for elected office, isn't it?

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

You notice how they don't talk about that Hunter Biden laptop full of cp that Rudy Giuliani said he had and kept showing people.

[-] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It was all pictures of Hunter's magnum dong

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

I know this shouldn't affect Joe Biden presidential run in theory, but... In a normal country and at a time before Trump, if your rival is an incompetent lier, you'd afford to send a different person to run.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

too bad Republican traitors don't care about going after their rich friends who are huge tax dodgers.. just desperate to throw mud anywhere near Joe because he's clean, and they're all covered in shit from birth..

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
112 points (87.8% liked)

News

23024 readers
3404 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS