this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
731 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29788 readers
1707 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 136 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

“Lightweight Jamie Raskin is a stupid person’s idea of a smart person,” said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle.

Trump is a poor white trash person's idea of a rich person.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Judging by how much the billionaires back him, I don't think that's true. The idea that billionaires are anything other than scammers and abusers like Trump is pretty obviously false. He just doesn't mask it.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 month ago (3 children)

He's a useful idiot. Back in the 90s when he was doing fast food commercials, he lost massive amounts of money. The appearance of bring a billionaire helped him become a billionaire again. The dude's a grifter and a puppet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No he's right. Trump before becoming president likely wasn't a billionaire. Trump is gold leaf trash amongst his peers, he's the bullshitter his peers play golf with to make fun of. He's the stupid face for the real Billionaires with tens and hundreds of billions. A Tool of no pedigree, his grandpa dodged the draft and made it opening a whore house.

The billionaires don't see him as one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

Billionaires back whoever they think can get them the most money. It really isn't any deeper than that.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are they just now catching onto and parroting memes from his first term? Lemmy needs a "the right can't meme" comm if there isn't one already.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah, pretty big "2016 called and wants their Trump meme back" energy from this one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 93 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

I was about to complain yet again "that's not how it works", but then I looked up the text again and this is explicitly allowed. Congress can set up a commission that basically takes the place of the Cabinet for 25th Amendment purposes. So now all this talk of the 25th amendment makes a bit more sense to me.

They still need a 2/3 margin in both houses even after the commission makes their determination, because the idiot is guaranteed to contest it. But maybe there is some truth to the idea that Republicans won't vote to impeach but would vote to declare him incompetent, based on his dumb tweets

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 37 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think the chances that republicans will admit their guy is incompetent is close to 0. They will rather lock him up in the white house basement for 2 years.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe the dementia will progress far enough that he’ll forget he needs to send in a letter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I were a Republican I'd be arguing that there's no way Americans didn't already know he was incompetent when voting for him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Oh great another 2 year circus side show.

A commission to assess?

Ffs.

Nuke us from space.

[–] jestho@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Your request for "nuke us from space" has been filed. It may take up to 15-20 years before you get a reply.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And if you follow there may Be a tomorrow but if The offer's shunned You might as well be walking on the Sun

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 month ago
[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (31 children)

Has anyone noticed that the "both sides are the same so don't bother voting" crowd have tripled efforts since we neared another important election time frame, funny how that happens.

Especially pitching that in the face of Hungary's recent transition.

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have not noticed that, no.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Consider this your notification then

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Today@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (9 children)

His craziness needs to stay in until December.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 17 points 1 month ago

Man, woman, felon, camera.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Jesus Christ just go for impeachment. If you can 25th, you can impeach. What a waste of time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

His mental fitness is being assessed constantly. They just don't care about his decline. Putin will have him as long as he think he can serve his purpose as being a useful idiot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 13 points 1 month ago

That's basically saying "No u".

Gross
Old
Projection

Seriously, people have (rightly) been saying this about Trump for decades!

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Congress has the power to create a commission to exercise the power to remove a mentally unfit president from office. The biggest worry is that this would inevitably be politicized. I say, let it happen! Let it be political. Let's have an openly political "mental health commission" that will rule that being a member of the opposite political party is a mental illness. Hell, let it become a formality. It will simply be expected that the president will be removed from office after a change in Congressional control. Whenever a change in control of Congress happens, the new Congressional leadership will stuff it with political ideologues. And they'll inevitably rule a president of the opposing party to be mentally unfit. Eventually it just becomes a formality, no one even considers it unusual. We just expect the presidency to be able to flip every two years. And we giggle that it has to be done by formally declaring the previous guy to be crazy. I think this would be a good idea.

Why? Because this would effectively transform the US into a Parliamentary democracy. A simple majority in both houses of Congress would be enough to install a new president. They effectively become a Prime Minister at that point. Parliamentary democracies have proven much more resilient to strong-man dictatorial takeover. It's not as perfect a solution as amending the constitution to formally remove the office of president entirely, but it would be a decent hack to do something similar. And going to a Parliamentary system isn't a magic cure-all, but it does have quite a bit of merit. As a plus, we would have the bonus of being "that nation that regularly declares its former leaders legally crazy." And you know what? I think that works well with America's energy.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I haven’t seen this on Reddit yet. It’s interesting to compare what’s posted on lemmy and reddid.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I knew the dems would form a committee eventually. It's only a matter of time now. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does the 25th also work to remove Schumer and Jeffries from office?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ragnar_ok@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

he's going to ace it! it'll be the best 25th amendment commission they've ever seen! Maybe even the most they've ever seen, who knows? lots of people were saying "wow you aced it mr president"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"We are going to file a request to create a vote in order to create a commission, that can create a petition to allow us to file the article to vote on whether or not we can impeach the seditious, blackmailed. child raping, human trafficker that sold out our country".

The rules are pretty hilarious at this point.

They REALLY WANT HIM GONE GUYS

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Hilarious how everyone here complains they take the (slow) bureaucratic route.

This is a political party and that's how they can act.

If you want fast results, take it to the streets. Kicking him out outside of bureaucratic procedures is everyone's responsibility, not specifically the elected parties

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Another performative stunt. Dead on arrival and everyone knows it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I co-chaired the committee that reviewed the recommendation to revise the color of the book that regulation's in... We kept it grey!"

Bureaucratic babbel at it's finest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Sure let's do everything but useful stuff

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What's useful stuff at this point, shooting him? At least this will force the Republicans to vote against it making it look like they have something to hide.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

force the Republicans to vote against it making it look like they have something to hide.

It always cracks me up when liberals assume this matters to anyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Congress doesn’t use the 25th amendment, it’s the president’s cabinet.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago (17 children)

That is not completely accurate:

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Congress can, indeed, create a commission that serves as a substitute to the cabinet for 25th amendment purposes.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dems can't get anything done in Congress, so they might as well poison the MAGA well for the Midterms.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, it's moderately encouraging to see Dems doing something to fight Trump, but Congress doesn't have the authority to utilize the mechanisms in the 25th amendment to remove Trump. They can issue articles of impeachment (again), but there are too many conservative senators and representatives protecting Trump for that to be viable, either.

This bill won't go anywhere, and even if it did pass, it wouldn't have any effect.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At this point, most of the power they have is performative. They can’t actually do much of anything, but they can make noise. It’s nice to see them doing that. The only shot they have at convincing the MAGA politicians to flip is by flipping public opinion more than it already is.

Even then, I’m not sure it would matter. What are people in red states going to do? Vote for a Democrat!? The mere thought of such a thing!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›