this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
393 points (97.6% liked)

Privacy

48357 readers
502 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 118 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I found this morsel particularly poignant:

"Ironically, Meta expected rights groups to be too busy to step in, given the disastrous geopolitical climate.

“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads, as quoted by the NYT."

Who are the morally bankrupt execs who wrote this? I want names.

[–] Gathorall@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And I used to think the "secret dastardly plan diary" -files scattered around in Resident Evil and the like were silly B-movie stuff that obviously would not be written down in the real world.

But no, they're assigned in company strategy meetings and politicians just hit their supplier on Gmail with "Heya yo haave sum tasty kiids to fuck in Cali thiss wekend?"

[–] racoon@lemmy.ml 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"if such a dynamic political environment fails to come, the corporation will spur on dynamism by sponsoring alternative dynamic groups from within the country whenever possible"

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The fact that this is being said so openly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's particularly evil. No matter what their lame rationalizations will be, this is how we know that they created this tech in bad faith, and they intend to use it in bad faith.

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 14 points 3 weeks ago

Yup. It’s also an admission that they know they are in the wrong and will cause harm to people, but don’t care. A lot of these companies try to pull the “we didn’t consider these concerns; we need to do more research” shit when they get called out on it, but this makes it blatantly obvious that’s bullshit

[–] Megacomboburrito@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow, they said the quiet part out loud

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 103 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Also, it will introduce: snitchonomics.

Mass surveillance is here, but what if you could be an annoying little shit in the local community? Introducing: snitchonomics. Go around your neighborhood, discover discrepancies, automate your snitching and become a toadie for the local commissars.

Meta: the Nazis would have loved us.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

HOA board members are so horny for these right now.

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

HOA in USA is insane. I just can't believe they are real.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] el_eh_chase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago

Just add an arbitrary point system like they give reviewers on Google Maps and people will be beating down the door to do this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 40 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Get ahead of the curve and make these illegal.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

Haha laws aren't made to benefit the population silly.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The problem with that is, how do we make glasses like these illegal without also making g any type of filming in public illegal?

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Buy a pair and follow rich and powerful people around with them. That's how they become illegal.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Introducing House Bill 33-29-5 a.k.a. the 'save our children from pedophiles with cameras' bill

Legal summary

  • Prohibits filming anyone with a portfolio worth higher than $500,000
  • Prohibits owning a camera without a $10,000 camera license
  • Legalizes whipping the shit eating worm who took video of me visiting my mistress
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago

I think hidden cameras are already illegal in some places, no?

Like you can't film in a bathroom, so wouldn't they be required to take these glasses off before walking in?

Just expand that so no secret cameras can be used, or.cameras disguised as every day objects like pens and glasses.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not like meta has a long history of ignoring obvious, enormous problems theyre causing that experts keep pleading with them to take seriously. Like in Myanmar. Where it has killed an enormous number of people and the death toll keeps rising.

I'm sure they'll do something this time

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Like in Myanmar

It was horrific, what hapened there with Facebook. Viral rumors would spread, the Rohingya were putting sterilization pills into the food supply. People would believe it. Then they would torture or kill those the rumors were about. They would burn down their businesses and homes. There were mass scale murder and rape, whole viliages burned. Because Facebook had displaced local news. What was on Facebook became the reality for so many people. It became an anti-Rohingya echo chamber, the hate would feed on itself.

I think this effect is playing out in western democracies today. Slower, because the US, Canada, or Europe altogether, are much larger than Myanmar. The big ship turns slower than the small. But the same dynamics are here. Viral social media posts make their own twisted "reality". It's not just Facebook, neither. It's lots of others too.

I don't know how to stop it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wizbiz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Gonna make Bluetooth scramblers real popular

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

And there's an app called "nearby glasses" that'll notify us when/where anyone nearby has these meta glasses active.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

They know. They consider it a sell-able feature.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 6 points 3 weeks ago

Perverts know what perverts want.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

They have already had people on them for not stopping scam ads, they get paid by their customers so they don;t care how many of their products are harmed.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 20 points 3 weeks ago

Meta: "That's the point!"

[–] SleepyPie@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Please reach out to your family and urge them to stop using Facebook (or worse, any form of reels) if they still do. The onus is on the informed now. It’s not enough to just ask the tech barons to stop, we also need to divert their support.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Just need to associate ray bans with creeps moving forward. If they are too far away to tell, just assume it's a fucking weirdo in Meta glasses. Forever associate the brand with creepy weirdos, and maybe they'll rethink their strategy.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

slapping a spy device from their face is self defense, not a crime

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Balaclavas will be in fashion

[–] Tundra@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I was really interested in who the pervert experts were, but it turns out it was just human rights groups.

[–] qualia@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

"Pervert Glasses" = AI glasses (For doomscrollers who don't read the articles)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

so like, i think the tech is cool. i can't really think of a good use case for it though. that's the thing.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

When google glass first debuted, I was thinking how much easier my job could be if I could have the faces of the people authorized to enter in that device to make admission easier (there were over 300 faces to remember that didn't have to use their issued ID due to position), as in, when a person approaches if they were in my "PRIVATE ON DEVICE" database their access card would display on my screen. Never got one, thankfully. This new tech would be great for this except I doubt that there would be an offline mode, so I see no use case for this unless you want to assist in the tracking of people for Meta.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] amaryllisfever@lemmychan.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully this will start normalizing wearing masks in public.

load more comments
view more: next ›