this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
382 points (97.8% liked)

Privacy

47947 readers
1088 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Get ahead of the curve and make these illegal.

[–] lmmarsano@group.lt -4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Or don't, because we aren't fragile ninnies unfamiliar with the concept of carrying a microphone & camera everywhere we go & easily carried away by sensational headlines for dumbasses.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The cameras and microphones we carry around are not hidden, and one can tell when one is being recorded by them, ninny.

[–] lmmarsano@group.lt 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Nah, not really. When someone is holding their mobile device, we haven't the slightest clue unless they're overt & clumsy about it. No indicator light, either. This selective outrage is peak ninny nonsense for dullards who can't manage a second's thought & need fellow average brains to point this out.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

"Being secretly recorded by smart glasses is the same as being recorded on a smartphone" is a really dumb take.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Haha laws aren't made to benefit the population silly.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The problem with that is, how do we make glasses like these illegal without also making g any type of filming in public illegal?

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Buy a pair and follow rich and powerful people around with them. That's how they become illegal.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Introducing House Bill 33-29-5 a.k.a. the 'save our children from pedophiles with cameras' bill

Legal summary

  • Prohibits filming anyone with a portfolio worth higher than $500,000
  • Prohibits owning a camera without a $10,000 camera license
  • Legalizes whipping the shit eating worm who took video of me visiting my mistress
[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You wouldn't be able to get close enough to them.

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How close do you need to get for facial recognition with a device that is designed to vacuum up every face it comes across? After a couple of scandals about who was out where with whom, that's all it would take.

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I kinda think kureta@lemmy.ml is right tho, it'd be hard. People like Zuck, they take private jets from here to there. They don't fly commercial. They don't go eat to normal restaurants with the plebs, he has high end privately catered. He don't do his own shopping. Zuck bought 11 houses around his own mansion, for .... privacy!

That goes into an observation. Zuck zealously guards his own privacy. He doesn't want YOU to have privacy! But HE wants as much privacy as he can get.

Make a series of drones that look like parts of the houses surrounding Zuck's main home, maybe chimneys, plumbing vents, etc.

Even using a private jet, a flight plan has to be registered. Musk removed an account from Twitter for posting his "private" flight information. Same thing can be done to Zuck.

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Good points. But the plebs happen to serve these folks. Not to mention congressmen/women tend to be a lot easier to follow than billionaires. Also the paparazzi are a crafty folk being handed another tool to be sneaky. We'll see.

True... paparazzi can get to people sometimes.

Totally with you on the idea, btw. I think the people destroying the privacy of everyone in society should feel that themselves, too. They shouldn't get to hide behind infinite piles of money to guard their own privacy while they destroy ours.

It would be one thing if we could easily opt out. But we can't. It's not MY choice that puts me into this. It's the choice of some other rando walking down the same sidewalk as me.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

I think hidden cameras are already illegal in some places, no?

Like you can't film in a bathroom, so wouldn't they be required to take these glasses off before walking in?

Just expand that so no secret cameras can be used, or.cameras disguised as every day objects like pens and glasses.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

I think the best start would be to make it illegal to collect and retain data that would make devices like this useful.