this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
508 points (99.0% liked)

simpsonsshitposting

5231 readers
164 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We need to write a sawng about how we don't diddle kids.

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Frank, you look horrific

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

The paper she was reading from (which I strongly suspect was written by someone else) said "convicted", but she said "convinced".

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago

my mind immediately jumps to how bill clinton just said "i did not have sexual relations with that woman", which was obviously a bold-faced like, so.. why whouldn't she just lie??

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago

How ill do we think he is - weeks or months?

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I finally know where I have heard that accent before.

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Every day, the adage "every accusation is a confession or declaration of intentions" keeps being proven more and more true.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

madam in cheif

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

"Donalds? I win Best Movie Star, yes? Or else you bomb the Academy!"

[–] Lenny@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I’ve never been legally accused of eating an entire sleeve of Oreos at 3 in the morning last night.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

So brave :')

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

Neither have I, lady, but you don't hear me holding press conferences about it.

[–] Klox@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

I'm thinking someone should legally accuse her.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"No member of my immediate faimily has never been formally accused^1 of the sex crimes my husband has been covering up."

^1 statement does not include civil judgments holding my husband liable for sexual assault

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I wonder what she knows that hasn't been made public yet. She's clearly trying to get out in front of something.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

She's been right there when they picked out girls, it's all in the files. I regret reading that part because it haunts me, it was described vividly. Imma take it down a few notches but still gonna spoiler tag and warn that it's graphic:

spoilerThey basically had 10-13 yo girls put in line, then went to each and put their fingers inside them to see if they were good (whatever that means), then Trump, Epstien etc. took them to private rooms to do worse things. The first part being with Melina, their own kids and other people right there.

[–] Microw@piefed.zip 14 points 1 week ago

Apparently she is in a legal battle against Michael Wolff who claimed that Epstein was the one who originally introduced Melania and Trump to each other

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Draegur@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago

Have never been legally accused or convicted SO FAR...!
83VdHD3qSB1Oabd.jpg

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We have a strange suspicion that she was secretly trying to remind everybody that the Epstein Files are still a problem.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

That would mean she's not a scumbag.
But she is one.

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Not it doesn't. It means she wants her disgusting anchor hubby to stroke out so she can fade into obscurity with billions of stolen dollars.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oddly precise wording. She could have chosen more blanket language and she didnt. She might just as well have held a press conference and admitted she is guilty.

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I don't think so.

Here's an example of what I'm talking about:

Kreskin frequents schools, abducts children, and eats babies. Although my claims are baseless, you have been accused of child abduction. If you ever claim that you have never been accused of child abduction, my comment is evidence that you are lying.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Up until today I’d just assumed without thinking about it that she wasn’t involved in any of the scummier Epstein dealings, but she’s just done a good job of making me question that.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

She's in the files and theres both proof and unproven things said that puts her right in the deep end with them all, she's just as bad as them.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've never been legally accused or convicted of speeding at or above 10 mph over the posted speed limit in the state of Kansas

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First, epstein island to distract from the thing.

Second war to distract from epstein island.

Third we're back to epstein island again.

Fourth, coliseum gladiator fight between nepotism babies on Crack (hunter Biden vs trump sons).

Lolz.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

$50 on Hunter, those trump babies look like you could snap 'em over your knee

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

.....So far

WE DRAW THE LINE AT EMBEZZLING FROM CHILDRENS CANCER CHARITIES!

load more comments
view more: next ›