this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
730 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

83672 readers
1238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 92 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To the people saying things like "what took you so long", I think you're missing the point. They even address this in the post:

EFF exists to protect people’s digital rights. Not just the people who already value our work, have opted out of surveillance, or have already migrated to the fediverse. The people who need us most are often the ones most embedded in the walled gardens of the mainstream platforms and subjected to their corporate surveillance.

When the ship is sinking, there's some value in someone staying behind to help people get off. That's not the same as generating value for Shitter.

[–] ziproot@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As for why they did decide to leave now, they explain that their posts are being viewed by significantly less people now than in the past, so there is basically nobody left to help off the sinking ship any more.

[–] 0t79JeIfK01RHyzo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

The traffic seems well ranked still. Maybe concerns of algorithmic censorship? As an example, X.com now promotes posts from premium users, and then has an extra promotion mode for premium+ users. (Normal users are now much less visible than premium users)

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Ppl on Lemmy don't get the preaching to the choir is not how you grow

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 160 points 1 day ago (4 children)

People leaving Twitter now is not very impressive. Less "seeing the light" and more "Trumpgret".

I'll remind you that the Debian project left Twitter over a year ago. So the EFF isn't as fast moving or comfortable with change like ... Debian.

[–] nathan@piefed.alphapuggle.dev 196 points 1 day ago (5 children)

From their mastodon:

EFF exists to protect people's digital rights. Not just the people who already value our work, have opted out of surveillance, or have already migrated to the fediverse. The people who need us most are often the ones most embedded in the walled gardens of the mainstream platforms

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 28 points 1 day ago (6 children)

There are plenty of mainstream platforms to reach such people on that aren't owned by (openly) Nazi billionaires.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hence why this article is about them leaving the openly Nazi billionaire's platform while remaining on other platforms that are mainstream and still provide a lot of reach :)

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yah, it's the EFF, they get significant latitude from their history.

[–] miked@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

As they should.

A non-profit that fights daily for our electronic freedoms can leave X whenever they damn well please. They decided today was that day and I am perfectly fine with that.

EFF is one of the orgs I often donate to.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

And the argument is sound even without appeal to authority. You’re so right!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Name one single mainstream (i.e. >10 million users) platform that isn't owned by a nazi pedophile billionaire.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will say that double posting is a completely reasonable solution. More orgs should be the gateway where they can be seen, and have the visibility of the big platforms, but they also offer Mastodon as an alternative. If enough orgs do that, it enables people to just... move.

It's hard for users to move when 75% of their content is exclusive to X. And it's hard for orgs to move when 75% of the users are on X. Double posting allows this to move to 10% X exclusive content, 60% content that's available everywhere, and 10% exclusive to open platforms. After the orgs move the content, it's so much easier for users to move, and after the users move, it's easier for the orgs to move.

This should be a cooperative thing. And afaik it doesn't take that much effort to post the content to two places.

[–] viov@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That's why people have found out recently that existing on legacy and new way better platforms is good way to get accustomed to new ones. Along with to keep bringing people in to do the same of having one foot on both sides

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is not a contest to be holier than thou. It's a numbers game.

EFF stayed on Twitter because it has a larger audience and that means a larger portion of people will see their messaging. In fact, I would argue that the people that are still on Twitter are the ones most in need of seeing those messages. The people that care about what Debian is posting are almost certainly already on Mastadon.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel like the EFF's messaging is just not going to get through to anyone still on Twitter.

Remember, it's not a fair forum; it's an algorithm. And it's not going to show the EFF to users who need to see it.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel like the EFF’s messaging is just not going to get through to anyone still on Twitter.

The problem is that the fundamental catch-22 of social networks is that the content and the users reinforce each other. Self-hating/regretting Twitter/X users exist, but they are there because there are network effects, including organizations who still also use it, they are not willing to give up. Similar organizations are there because the users are still there. And yes, I do think they still see the people they want because of follows/subscriptions, even if alt-right fascism is also being thrown into their feed by the algorithm.

It sucks so many people haven't left yet, but that's why every choice to leave is worth celebrating, because it breaks down the long-term network effects every time, even at the cost of short-term value to the users or orgs.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To illustrate what I mean more clearly, look at the top comments/replies for the NASA Artemis posts, as an example.

...It's basically all conspiracy theorists, and government skeptics.

Twitter's focusing the Artemis posts on them because it's what they want to see, and most engaging for them.

In the EFF's case, I'm not just talking about Musk's influence. The algorithm will only show the EFF to users who would be highly engaged by it. E.g., angry skeptics who wouldn't be swayed by the EFF anyway, or fans who already agree with the EFF. It's literally not going to show the EFF to people who need to see it, as Twitter's metrics would show it as unengaging.


This is the "false image" I keep trying to dispel. Twitter is less and less an "even spread" of exposure like people think it is, like it sort of used to be, more-and-more a hyper focused bubble of what you want to hear, and only what you want to hear. All the changes Musk is making are amplifying that. Maybe that's fine for some orgs, but there's no point in the EFF staying in that kind of environment, regardless of ethics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Linken@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t believe in Trumpgret.

Their hearts haven’t changed, they just don’t like being hated.

We are seeing this a lot with podcast/youtube people, like Alex Jones.

It doesn’t matter what they say now, they begged for him to be elected. They chose him and are responsible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Regna@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Progress is progress. As any sane people would repeat: perfect is not the enemy of good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

On to Wayland I guess.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

an X post today receives less than 3% of the views a single tweet delivered seven years ago

the town square lmao

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Free speech absolutionist"

[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Damn... we all should have known elon can't spell.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What the everliving fuck were they still doing there

[–] cowfodder@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Trying to help people that didn't know about the alternatives.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

How long do you stay on a platform before the outreach to new people is outweighed by implicit support of the platform?

It's a tough call. It is difficult to reach out to outsiders and talk to them but it's the only way to have a conversation with them.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Another reason why they stayed there for years is not only it's one of many channels for which to impart their news about their activities or telling users they have individual right to privacy, with fucking Musk now in charge, their presence sought to challenge that bastard's grip upon social media. Likewise, neither the UN nor Al-Jazeera are yet leaving the platform for the sake of informing the world and the oppressed in general, despite these organizations being opposed to right-wing warmongering, lying, and mafia capitalism, and Musk and those goddamned bots in response trying to harass or reduce their presence.

[–] Regna@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Progress is progress. As any sane people would repeat: perfect is not the enemy of good.

About fucking time.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I missed the "X" in that title, and read "EFF is leaving the Electronic Freedom Foundation," and was very confused.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I do that too sometimes when I just woke up, and I'm on the toilet, and my brain isn't on yet.

........you are still half asleep and functionally not all there yet mentally, right?

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

……..you are still half asleep and functionally not all there yet mentally, right?

Only all the time, brother. All the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] czl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago

ITT: people thinking that people already on the fediverse are the ones that the EFF needs to reach

As a South African this confused the shit out of me at first.

I thought it was the hateful political party the Economic Freedom Fighters, who chant things like "Kill the Boer" at their rallies

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago

Well, better late than never.

Just call it Twitter

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 7 points 1 day ago

I’m surprised they were still there until this point. But yeah, good for them.

load more comments
view more: next ›