148
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 119 points 1 year ago

Nobody needs CoD to be Successful.

[-] Contend6248@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's such a weird take, i don't remember any platform CoD had impact.

PC was big before, Nintendo is doing their own thing, smartphones were big before and Sony / Microsoft had both CoD anyway

Yeah, if anything consoles made CoD big, people willing to pay for fucking online are also willing to pay 60 bucks each year for the same game...

[-] Hextic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nintendo switch says "sup?"

[-] JoshuaSlowpoke777@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Nintendo has their own IPs to carry them, I don’t think CoD is helping them much, if at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Neato@kbin.social 60 points 1 year ago

This was just more MS propaganda so they could buy Activision and consolidate. Further harming gaming competition. It shouldn't be taken as anything but twisted truth for a profit.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

I'm conflicted. On one hand, monopoly is absolutely bad.

On the other hand, Kotick is an abusive, greedy asswipe who is directly responsible for some of the worst trends in AAA gaming; the sooner he gets the boot, the better we all are.

[-] Rayspekt@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

My conflict lies more with how Sony fucked up gaming with their exclusive deals for the last decade or so and now Microsoft is pulling the Uno reverse on them, where I as a PC gamer lean more towards Microsoft. That's the part of this merger I personally like to a degree.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Two decades. There was the dead years between ~2004 and 2012ish where both MS and Sony played the exclusive game. Then MS realized they could double down and get PC exclusives as well as Xbox, but with PC they don't have to eat the hardware costs

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Kotick is an abusive, greedy asswipe who is directly responsible for some of the worst trends in AAA gaming

And that's why giving him a payout is good?

the better we all are.

I don't think I'm better off when Blizzard games will be exclusive to MS platforms.

[-] Xanvial@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And is it confirmed that Kotick will leave after ActiBlizz bought by MS? Usually for big company purchase like this, the key people will be kept and/or integrated to main company

[-] JoshuaSlowpoke777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I dunno if he moreso deserves the boot or the sword at this point.

As in, criminal penalties for basically running a harassment ring, if applicable.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

He's reported he wants to leave. Because he'll become an even bigger billionaire. But there's no guarantee that we've seen, is there? He's egotistical enough he may want to stay on.

MS has lately had a fairly light touch on their acquisitions. They just want their profits to be theirs and to use their IPs to push Xbox sales.

But even if he leaves, it's unlikely MS is going to radically shift their games to be more consumer friendly. CoD and King already prey on children and make bank doing it. MS isn't throwing that away.

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah this isn't news.

[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"So, what Valve invested in was WiNE, a protocol […]". Ah, game journalists; the profession where sniffing glue will actually give you an advantage

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mars@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

It’s amazing how so many people are falling into the trap and arguing against or even in favor of Microsoft’s CoD argument.

A single game of whatever size or importance is not the problem. But it’s in Microsoft’s best interest that the discourse keeps being this lacking in nuance and centered in aspects like this.

[-] Mandy@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

LMAO as if anyone needs that shit to have measurable success

[-] skymtf@pricefield.org 11 points 1 year ago

Why can't the steam deck run COD exactly? Is Microsoft trying to ship it as some alien UWP app

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago

Malware labeled "anticheat software" that wants obscene access to low level OS information and is a massive security liability.

[-] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 36 points 1 year ago
[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

A new whitepaper published August 24th to Trend Micro explains how the perfectly legitimate driver mhyprot2.sys was used, absent any other parts of Genshin Impact, to gain root access to a system.

I think maybe you should re-evaluate your definition of "perfectly legitimate".

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Just like the ~~Mafioso~~ "perfectly legitimate businessmen" who offer fire insurance and personal injury insurance door to door, after dark. Be a real shame if something were to happen.

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I can understand that bugs happen. It's absolutely possible for well intentioned software to have a fatal flaw that leads to catastrophic security breaches.

But there's no scenario where a game having that access is defensible. It's gross overreach that can't possibly be in good faith and you deserve all the hate you get if anything bad happens.

[-] timi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The way people who cheat talk about input modifier devices leaves a bad taste in my mouth, so I can understand why a driver level system was considered.

Cheaters in online games really are the worst type of people because they feel entitled to ruin other peoples games. It’s one thing to “level up” your solo experience. It’s a different thing to intend to ruin someone else’s.

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if we pretended it was possible for their anticheat to work (it isn't), it's pure unredeemable evil to think it's possible for there to be a scenario you're entitled to that access.

If 50 percent of players were cheaters without that access and literally no one ever cheated again with it, you would be a monster to consider using it. It should be a criminal offense with mandatory jail time to the CEO and board of directors for every single computer it's installed on.

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of Sony's Rootkit. Except now it's normal.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Contend6248@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Let's punch a huge hole in the OS and go from there. That sounds perfectly reasonable.

I could maybe somehow understand it, if it would bring you absolute safety from cheaters, the funniest part about this is, the cheat devs are still above them, so just throw in the towel of trying to destroy the safety of legitimate players devices if you are still losing anyway.

[-] TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I am not very familiar with the gaming industry (casual gamer only) but, while the argument is true, the conclusion that the big players can apply monopolistic practices without constraints leaving smaller players unaffected, is simply false.

[-] travir@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
148 points (95.7% liked)

Steam Deck

14469 readers
268 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS