Fubarberry

That's definitely costing them more than running it on their own hardware, but it doesn't mean AI is costing them more than the AI startups. Anthropic for example is already paying SpaceX 1.25 Billion a month for compute, and has agreed to pay Google 200Billion oflcer the next 5 years for access to Google's compute and TPU chips.

Google's deal with xAI specifically lets them terminate the deal with 90 days notice after the end of the year. Google is also investing heavily in building new data centers with their hardware. I'm assuming this deal means they've eclipsed their current TPU capacity, and are just looking for a short term bandaid until they can catch up with their new constructions.

I respect that.

If running a windows game through wine, there are some risks if the game contains a virus.

The biggest risk is that wine typically makes your Linux user files available by having them mounted as the z: drive. If you run an exe that's actually ransomware, it can possibly encrypt some of your userfiles if permissions allow. This isn't an issue if you run the games through steam, because it runs windows programs in containers.

There's also a risk of keyloggers, but they should only work for things running inside the same wine session.

Sounds like a bad adapter, if you reach out to killswitch they might send you a new one.

You can also get pretty cheap displayport to hdmi cables online.

Honestly Google is likely to beat openAI and Anthropic as things are.

OpenAI and Anthropic have to buy/rent their hardware from Nvidia, while Google is making their own TPU hardware. Google's hardware costs on AI is way lower, every dollar they spend on it goes a lot farther.

And unlike the other two, they're already a profitable company. They're making record profits right now. They don't have a desperate need to figure out how to make back billions on their AI models, they can just keep offering Gemini at a comparatively cheap price and wait for anthropic and open AI to bankrupt themselves.

For 2, there are ways to install packages without messing with the read only file system. Easiest ways are using nix packages or using distrobox to install non-flatpak software.

So for the linked aur PWA package you provided, you could create an arch linux distrobox, enter it, install yay (or another aur helper), install firefox and your pwa package, and then use the distrobox-export --app <package> command to make the installed software directly runnable from the desktop.

Hyprland, specifically with the end4 illogical impulse desktop.

It's pretty and I really like how functional it is, but some recent updates have changed how some of the config files work requiring changes. It's an inconvenience I'm willing to put up with though.

I think so, but it's spread among different menus and flags. Plus if even if you disable it, it's still there, one of the origin options sounds like it has it fully removed from the code.

People don't hesitate to criticize things just because they're popular, usually people are quicker to hate on something because it's popular.

I think it was just a good game, that legitimately appealed to a lot of people, and so any criticisms about woke content died out as people realized they liked it or respected it.

Great game, although these days I mostly play it on my phone.

From what I've seen, a lot of the pushback against "woke" games revolves around whether they're good or not. Almost no one cares about a good game being woke, stuff like BG3 was widely enjoyed by a lot of people despite having gay characters/etc.

However when a game is bad or mediocre, people are quick to blame any "woke" content in the game. There's a mentality of "they were putting effort in pushing a political/social agenda I don't agree with, while not putting in enough effort on the stuff that actually matters".

Of course, now you have a lot of people assuming whether a game will be good or not based on how the perceive it. But if it comes out, and is actually a good game, that's enough to quiet most all of the complaints it seems.

Valve actually initiated FEX and has been funding it since the very beginning, there was an interview with the Verge where they talk about it.

Basically the whole thing is Valve's baby, they have a lot of different open source projects that they are quietly funding.