this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
432 points (98.6% liked)

News

37562 readers
1855 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘She got ripped away from me,’ army soldier Matthew Blank said after his wife Annie Ramos was detained in Louisiana

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents under the command of the Trump administration have reportedly detained the wife of a US army staff sergeant at his military base in Louisiana amid his preparations to deploy.

The arrest of Annie Ramos, 22, took place last Thursday, just days after she married 23-year-old Matthew Blank, a soldier who has served for more than five years and previously deployed to the Middle East and Europe, the New York Times first reported on Sunday.

Ramos, a biochemistry student with no criminal history who also teaches Sunday school, had been subject to a deportation order issued in absentia in 2005 when she was an infant after her family missed an immigration court hearing, the New York Times reported.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 120 points 1 month ago (5 children)

This isn't how you build morale for a ground war in a foreign nation.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago

If you were to ask for the personification of “The beatings will continue until morale improves” I’m not sure you could do much better than Pete’s dumbass face.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Send ICE to the Middle East. Their budget is big enough.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Or stop endangering Iranians and have Americans get off their arses and stop ICE themselves.

Why the fuck should Iran have to be the ones to shoot at ICE or any other of the evil empires thugs.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

have Americans get off their arses and stop ICE themselves

I'm reminded of folks who thought kids doing human wave attacks would be a good deterrent to school shooters.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yea clearly the solution is to offload the work onto other nations.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I would say that the Prince of Saud and the Prime Minister of the UK have significantly more influence over the behaviors of the US Federal Government than some random ditch-kicking voter in Peoria.

Hell, I'm cheering and clapping like a trained seal for the brave freedom-fighting IRGC right now. They've spent the last 40 years arming themselves and training to resist the full might of the US military. I have not.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

They've spent the last 40 years arming themselves and training to resist the full might of the US military. I have not.

Slacker!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Magikjak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are only about 20,000 ICE agents, even if you only count Democrat voters in 2024 ICE is outnumbered 1:3750.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago

Have you considered the people doing this are fucking idiots?

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago

Is morale lethality? No? Then it can go get fucked with logistics and strategy. Fucking nerd.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Sure it is. Gotta let the troops know what they're fighting for.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 42 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Do these stories change minds, or are conservatives such masters of cognitive dissonance that nothing at all will cause them to defect from their in-group?

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have seen many posts on X (Twitter) like this one, and after reading the comments, I can confirm that the latter is true. It truly seems to me that conservatives are incapable of empathy.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that a significant portion of internet comments are bots, especially on X.

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

That's exactly what a bot would say!

Kidding. I know. You're right.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Exactly. They just shrug and go, "Oh, well. Can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. Has he considered marrying a white woman? He should head to his local church, I'm sure there's a nice young thing he can scoop up there."

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

She was a Sunday school teacher so it’s possible that’s where he got this one

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

conservatives aren't hearing stories like this very much, they certainly don't read the guardian

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

they have an alternate algorithm. when news like this come up, they perceive it as negative and it impacts whatever engagement they have. Similar to how we start to tune out of stuff that make us upset.

They went all in on and are double downing on "fake news" because they identify with their leader all too well.

edit: the jubilee videos are a good example of how they'll rush to debate a "lib", but they all can't agree with each other's facts its insane.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cognitive dissonance isn’t a skill, it’s a bias. Generally the way it goes is that the worse things get, the tighter people hold on to their existing belief.

Think about it like this: people living in a prehistoric village are suffering from a famine. Under a lot of stress, people start arguing with each other about what the group should be doing. One person is suffering from cognitive dissonance because they believe the group has the wrong idea. Now, should that person abandon the group and go off on their own? Or should they stick it out and just try to survive?

Evolution favours sticking with the group. Hence cognitive dissonance resolves into status quo bias. Now you might say we’re no longer in that sort of situation. That doesn’t matter actually, because our brains are basically the same as they were 10,000 years ago! We have all the same biases, it’s our environment that has changed so much.

So why is it different for you or me? Simple. We’re part of different groups than they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Conservative don't go to platforms that have these kinds of stories.

It's an echo chamber remember?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

doubtful they dont arnt fed these stories on places like FOX, conservative radio, or right wing media. its to keep these people ignorant.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

They never hear about it. And if they do, they assume she did something to antagonize ice and it was his fault for not "controlling his woman".

And all the heroic men and women in The God Blessed United States Military will just talk about how this troubles them but they serve the flag, not the rapist giving them orders and that if people don't start properly respecting them then they don't see a reason to care.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I always thought that a small part of the reason that we, as a nation, try to respect our military and veterans is that it's a bad idea to train people to be good at killing other people, and then to antagonize them.

The higher ups wouldn't want to create a situation where they might become a target. But lately it seems like the civilian government has become much more abusive to the military and veterans. It's so foolish.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

It's like training Batman and then constantly trying to piss him off by attacking his city and family.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 1 month ago

"Total institutionalization."

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

the gop has pretty much are the abusers, and gaslights the veterans, and convince them that being using as cannon fodder is good. plus all the dinos that support this,

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"Are you a bad enough dude to save your wife?"

"Alternatively, are you a bad enough dude to **** the president?"

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago

Nope. Never going to be a bad enough dude to fuck the Mango Mussolini.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Save your wife and defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I always think of that one tweet. I'll serve crack before I serve this country.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

Ramos’s plight is one of only several instances that contradict Trump’s initial claims that his ongoing immigration crackdown would prioritize deporting dangerous criminals.

They really need better editing. It's clear from the rest of the paragraph they didn't mean the 'only' but it's a rather unfortunate error.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Despicable. But very naive that she went into the office to try to sort this out in person. Should have sent a lawyer instead. I guess some people don't follow the news very closely.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They think that because they voted for trump they're exempt from the consequences they've forced on others.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago

Well I doubt this woman voted for anyone since she has no legal status.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I follow the news and even I am always a little shocked by this. A few years ago they would have helped her and then touted it as an example of how well we treat our military.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What a shame. He looks filled with hope for the future and crayons for lunch.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I understand the confusion, but this is an Army sergeant, not a Marine.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Looks like it's a whole box for me!

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Sounds like a soldier needs to use what he's been trained to do....

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’ve met multiple people who married immigrants who overstayed their visa and had to deport for something like 5-10 years before being let into the US.

The citizen doesn’t need to leave obviously, but in the multiple cases I’ve personally known dating back to the 90s, the partner leaves the country to be with them until they can come back.

This is however not how it works if you marry someone here on a legitimate visa. Generally after marrying within the timeline of a visa before it expires you can stay with the citizen. My wife did this, and we just finished the process recently. You still need to get your paperwork in, but there’s some kind of grace period due to the marriage physically in the US along with the petition.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

Thank you for your sacrifice.

load more comments
view more: next ›