this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
167 points (98.8% liked)

World News

55306 readers
1864 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Chinese company's publication of AI-enhanced satellite images of US bases in the Middle East is helping Iranian forces identify targets, US intelligence believes.

The ABC has been briefed on the intelligence by a source inside US defence, who says the images are endangering lives.

Chinese geospatial artificial intelligence and software company MizarVision, which the Chinese government has a small ownership stake in, has been publishing detailed satellite images with tagging data of multiple US military sites in the lead-up to, and during, the Iran war.

The imagery showcases an AI tool that identifies and tags military forces across vast areas, a capability that once required the resources of a national intelligence agency.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Fitting, considering this war is merely a steppingstone to war with China.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

"Fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders. The most famous is 'Never get involved in a land war in Asia,' but only slightly less well known is this: 'Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line.'"

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

if it is, the USA is completely fucked… no amount of money can overcome this level of ineptitude

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 6 points 12 hours ago

Good to know that Russia isn’t helping its allies with their intelligence. In that case Trump would be very upset, if he could think.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago

Lemmy get this straight. The Trump admin was fine with satellite data being shared for all these years and then they commit a warcrime where the data is used to verify it indeed was a warcrime and now they want satellite data banned.

HMMMMMMMMMM

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 31 points 21 hours ago

Horrors. China is doing something the USA thinks only they are allowed to do.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (13 children)

And? Who gives a fuck. I would expect China and Russia to help Iran. Why wouldn't they?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 38 points 23 hours ago (22 children)

I do give a fuck. I'm glad they do because the only way I see for long term stability in that region, which affects my and my family's life in multiple ways, is for the US to lose the war as badly as possible.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 8 points 19 hours ago (9 children)

I think were pretty screwed either way. If they ramp down, Iran sees them as an existential threat and ramps up nuke capability, but now with less sanctions and more money. Iran with nukes makes Israel more twitchy as they see it as an existential threat.

If USA ramps up, we're in for a long protracted war and instability.

So we're screwed either way.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

if only the orange child rapist had done that very simple math before thinking it was a good idea to attack Iran to hide his kiddy diddling crimes

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I think Israel, without unlimited weapons backing of the US (a condition I think would occur if the US loses badly) would stop casual strikes against Iran. They would know they risk a barrage of missiles that they don't have the interceptors for. And if Iran gets the nuke, then MAD would be in effect. Israel seeing Iran as an existential threat now, not in the future would sit tight and perhaps even open a dialogue. The problem today is they consider Iran a threat in the future. And mind you they don't consider them a threat so much to Israel today than to their plans for expansion in Lebanon, West Bank, Syria and so on.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I think it's that they realize peak oil is over. The middle east is a geopolitical strategic position for energy, as the world is now finding out via Iran closing the SoH.

Israel realised that that is on the wane. Along with the next generations attitude towards their relationshipnwith Israel. Israel is going hard in now as they have a larger support from the USA. I fully expect that to naturally wind down due to internal US political change and global moves away from carbon fuel.

Sure, oil shocks would still bite, but nowhere near to the same level. It's why the other oil production states are desperately trying to pivot to other industries. Iran has screwed that by making them unsafe. America doesn't realize that by not protecting their allies there, in the same way they protect Israel, that they will lose them. Edit:typos

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

Not surprised at all. Don't fucking pretend China was not in game.....

[–] inari@piefed.zip 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The ABC has been briefed on the intelligence by a source inside US defence, who says the images are endangering lives.

I see. The images are endangering lives. Not the moronic decision to start a war, no no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Russia and China watch US pull a Ukraine and now have an extremely cost-effective way of harming or outright destroying US assets similar to US dumping its spare power into the Ukraine conflict.

They’d be fools not to take advantage of the opportunity, but not nearly as foolish as we were for entering this pointless war in the first place.

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

It's not pointless, the idea is to destroy the only remaining impediment to Israel's growth. With Iran removed from the picture, the whole region can be turned into a charnel house, with Israeli settlements and startups built upon the bones of the slaughtered Arabs. The whole middle east replaced by a second America, but even more fascist.

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

China as a state, just like the US, is a massive piece of shit. It does not need deference.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 hours ago

True, but tbf they do have a lot of Ws. They also have a lot of Ls, but that's not the subject of this conversation.

[–] mech@feddit.org 15 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

US is learning the hard way what "soft power" means, and what it means to lose it.

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 8 points 21 hours ago

They’re close to the “learning” part but, if the news is any indicator, they’re still a ways off.

Something about horses and water.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

For people who don't know, china doesn't have satellite imagery with the same spatial resolution as the private companies like planet labs (the one recently prohibited to publish imagery from the war region) do , but they have been investing a lot into super-resolution technology to compensate. This is much more interesting than it can look at a first glance.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Super-resolution as using generative models to "enhance" subresolution images with enough of the right training data?

[–] morto@piefed.social 13 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

Oh, that kind of super-resolution has been gaining media attention, but there's much more beyond the "ai". There are several mathematical methods, based on inverting a point-spread-function, statistical methods, super-resolution based on extracting subpixel information from a sequence of low resolution images, and several other methods and approaches, including the use of machine learning, but not in the generative way. It's a very diverse and complex field of research

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Well thats too bad.

Everyone had a nice easter? I hope you guys have monday off as well. I'm eating some crisps and watching DankPods

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 18 hours ago

Oh no! Anyway...

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 12 points 23 hours ago

Breaking news: Iran's allies help them against an invading force.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"Endangering lives"? Iran striking US bases will almost certainly lead to fewer lives lost.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago

~~Human~~ American lifes.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago

both russia and china specifically, they both have satellites.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 10 points 23 hours ago

"You're fighting back against out aggression? Hey, no fair!"

load more comments
view more: next ›