this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
450 points (99.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

11255 readers
1681 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 83 points 5 days ago (6 children)

whoa, you're saying a 6 time bankrupt felon can't manage an economy!? SAY IT ISN'T SO!

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 46 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Business is tough. Companies don’t all make it. There’s no shame in that.

It’s not like he bankrupted a fucking CASINO or something like that.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] weimaraner_of_doom@piefed.social 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Casino: a business where the revenue stream consists mostly of, "You give me money. I give you less money back."

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yup. Casinos may as well be money printing machines. It’s essentially a mint. It just produces money after more money. How the fuck do you bankrupt THREE casinos. Holy shit.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Here's my take.

Trump was in bed with the Mafia since dad gave him that small $1 million loan to get started.

But the real top bosses took one look at Donnie and fobbed him off on the second stringers. The top guys get the money, and the mooks hold Donnie's hand and show him where to sign.

So, Donnie learned from really dumb crooks. A smart crook would have kept all three casinos going, made legitimate profits and done ten times as much business laundering money.

Donnie thought he was a genius doing a bust out* that made him less money, but looked cool.

*Bust out. A legitimate business gets taken over by the mob. Starts ordering all kinds of high end merchandise. Don't pay for anything and sell the stuff cheap to other crooks. Eventually the legit business goes bankrupt, but the crew doesn't care.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Money laundering does seem likely. It is diaper Donnie after all

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 3 points 4 days ago

Not just likely. The business was fined for undeclared foreign funds. This got mostly ignored as it was in the process of going under.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 points 4 days ago

Because you use them to launder money.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

No, casinos sell dreams. Now is that something worth buying is an another question

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No one could have predicted this.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 16 points 4 days ago

nope. If only someone said this would happen and tried to warn the country. Wishful thinking, i guess.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

No Republican could've predicted this.

FTFY.

[–] jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The thing about his bankruptcies is HE still got paid. So they don't make any difference to him.

Just like he doesn't care what happens to this country as long as he gets what he wants.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He and his buddies are definitely getting rich off insider trading, on top of the bribes. You can bet on the economy going down, too, and it's easier to induce when you're the government.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You’re definitely right. He’s enriching himself (and, by extension, his billionaire buddies, though the only goal is enriching himself because he’s a self centred pos) and that’s all he cares about. America? Meh. World politics? Meh. More money for him? “SIGN ME UP!”

[–] spinne@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

USA! USA! USA! We did it everybody! Once again, victory comes as easy as a homemade, baked-from-scratch, double-crust, lattice top apple pie made by the housekeeper I hired illegally and continue to pay slave wages to by threatening to report them for deportation. What, I'm contributing to the local tax base because they pay sales tax on the stuff they buy, you should be thanking me!

/s

/s because it's important

/s in case it's a toggle

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

It's a tri-state 😓

Maybe you should have elected a racist rapist intead!

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 4 days ago

Damn. That’s what they did wrong

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Are you saying becoming a US president doesn't make a pedophile rapist into Sun Tzu?

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Is this how Twitter works now? Someone writes something useful in a decent place, then the first shill summarises, and the second shrill summarises the summary without even making it shorter? It's like going to YouTube to see a reaction video of a reaction video 🤯🤯🤯 but at least there I know it's actual people because AI can't properly fake videos.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 22 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I think this is how Twitter currently works. Users share informative information, than an influencer encapsulates it, while another influencer comes along and encapsulates it again but without reducing the length of the prior encapsulation. It’s roughly analogous to video-sharing platforms and reaction videos, however unlike those we can’t rule out the text isn’t an LLM.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is huge. A commenter on Lemmy just discovered this simple hack that has been plaguing social media since the 90s. Read to the end to understand how. So this Lemmy commenter replied to another comment--this is so unchained, this is why I love social media--that was itself a reply to an image of some other replies originally spotted Garfield on reddit. They found that you can get people already primed for scrolling to read pretty much anything as long as you provide an engaging emotional framing for the pointless content.

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

You need spoiler tags the hide the ending until I pay $5.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The solution is better people, which luckily we know how to make

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

people, which luckily we know how to make

Instructions clear, I'm going to have sex now

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

Nooooo oh alright

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago

(With education, not eugenics)

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I see what you did here.

Here's $5 for the advertising you did on my post /s

[–] qqq@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

We just need to ratio the original now

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 8 points 4 days ago

Something like half of the US can't read at a 6th grade level. They cannot read and understand the complex writing at the bottom.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Those ungrateful little shits!

[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago

For short clips, I think that this kind of "this guy said this" content is very achievable for AI - example (tbf this one is still 'person-based' as it's motion capture)

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 27 points 4 days ago

Turns out when you alienate all your allies, they don't like you anymore for some reason.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Its almost like he is purposely trying to destroy america to keep his child rape tapes hidden.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago

Also, insider trading.

[–] trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago

Republicans are truly the party of slamming your dick in the door.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

GröStrAZ (Greatest Strategist of All Time)

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Claiming to be second or third greatest isn't that catchy. Also, the original one was Feldherr (~ Commander), despite there have been others from that category previously more successful than him.

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Awww c'mon who could've seen that coming

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good thing alluminum is recyclible. Just make sure it isn't being thrown away or only used in exports.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There are different grades btw, recycled aluminum isn't used for most aviation or military stuff in general due to regulations on purity and such. But I guess that's a positive for the world regardless.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

From looking it up, it seems like making new aluminum from alumina ore is a massively energy intensive process, whereas recycling aluminum is just about melting it so takes a lot less energy.

It seems like, if the demand were there, it would be easy to make ultra pure aluminum from beer cans etc. It's just that right now there's enough demand for lower purity aluminum that the recyclers aren't bothering to chase the market for the ultra-pure stuff.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

According to my friend who used to work with that stuff, the bigger "problem" is mostly with regulations and balancing the risks; the damage potential of an aircraft accident (loss of life, brand reputation, recalls, etc) is exponentially more expensive than however much you'd save in production costs. Closed-loop recycling is usually the focus instead. But it would of course be cool.

At least that's kinda Airbuses viewpoint on it. Boeing on the other hand might be fine with delivering dodgy stuff and bribing away any possible fines ;)

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

It makes sense if everything that comes out of a ore-to-aluminum system is very pure whereas the stuff that comes out of a recycler isn't guaranteed to be as pure. You could probably set up some kind of quality control pipeline to ensure that the recycled stuff you were buying was top purity. But, that would add expense. It's also an untried way of doing things, whereas the ore-to-aluminum pipeline is probably well known and trusted.

There's probably a price where it makes sense, either ultra-pure recycled aluminum gets cheap enough that it's worth switching, or the aluminum that comes from ore is too expensive. But, until then the current system works and nobody wants to potentially be blamed for causing a crash by trying to save some money.

[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Just playing 12D chess boys…