this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
28 points (79.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47405 readers
2087 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Or open up job prospect and educational value?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Statistically Americans can barely read and write English at an adult level…

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 21 hours ago

Learning a language is a significant time investment, not only to learn the language but also to maintain proficiency. Unused skills degrade over time.

In terms of priorities and benefits vs time investment, it simply doesn't make the cut.

[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

Limited time and resources means ypu can't learn everything.

Is there a lot to improve and should certain subjects be switched for others? Sure. But does learning 4 languages to a very basic degree (which you will likely almost never use and therefore forget) important enough to kick off other subjects? I don't think so.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Because your leaders don't care if you succeed or die in a hole in the ground.

The general idea of school is to learn how to learn. Most of the core subjects are just the tip of their iceberg.
Take the older software devs who didn't have computers in school when they went. They technically use almost nothing they actually studied in school. So you don't really want to requie an overload on any given subject. Schools are even dialing back the math requirements. Like pre-calc. Not everyone needs that. The required algebra is more about problem solving than equations now. Which is good. Let the kids follow thier interests a little more.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact: You can learn without school. There's sooo much information outside of school walls, and it's easier to access now than ever in the history of humanity.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But learning in school gives you people to communicate with in the new language. Something that can be tougher to find on your own.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

There are language exchange sites and apps for that. Lots of people learn languages just as a fun hobby, and there are many resources out there for it

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

most Americans don't need any foreign language to pass high school.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And most don’t leave the country for vacations either

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

People do go to the Caribbean and Mexico, because they are within close travel distance. Most Americans could not afford a transatlantic vacation. You can take your whole family to Florida for a week just on the cost you'd spend on airfare going to Europe. It's like $1000 per person per flight, 12 hour+ flight, 8+ hour time difference. A $10,000+ vacation is really not in the average American's budget.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At my high school you needed 2 communication credits, foreign languages counted, so did drama, journalism, year book, cheer squad (this always puzzled me as it was not even a class), and others I am sure I am forgetting as it was 30ish years ago.

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (6 children)

11 states have foreign language requirements, but really we shouldn't even count them. A single 20-30 minute class per day is not going to achieve any proficiency in a foreign language. The only way for an American to actually achieve foreign language proficiency is to go to a 1/2 and 1/2 school.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah my high school said colleges would like for you to take a foreign language class, but it's not required to graduate from here. Some students did think it was required to graduate and a couple I talked to at the time were surprised to learn I didn't take any and still graduated.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

When did one foreign language become required?

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

US isn't even teaching the 1 very well. 7th grade is way too late to begin that kind of learning.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

7th grade? I never took a foreign language until 9th grade. I have two nephews, and both of them never took one until 10th.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Not sure about other countries, but here in Norway, English lessons start in the 2nd grade (6-7 years old). It wouldn't surprise me if it’s similar in the rest of Europe.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

In Spain there are places where two languages are taught at once since the first minute.  There are two official languages. And a third one is taught soon after that.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Or Catalan or Galician. And near Portugal, Portuguese.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 23 hours ago

I think this is one of the reasons why people from English-speaking countries are less motivated to learn other languages; English is almost everywhere, to varying degrees.

It's sort of a gift and a curse. I enjoy learning languages, but there's no practical need for me to, so I'm bad at it 🙈

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What traveling? You don’t need 4 languages for Disney World/Land.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Learning a language helps develop the brain.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Clearly you haven't been to EPCOT.

[–] Spitefire@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I honestly think it's because in measures of distance, a US American could be considered well-traveled without ever having left the United States. Living in DC and visiting Florida or California is a big trip logistically. I love to travel and have moved a LOT and I have just barely been to every state in the US (some I only drove through, fuck rural Nebraska). While I disagree personally, I think that most Americans just don't see the immediate utility in learning other languages.

Not learning Spanish in school as a requirement at this point is just racism, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Justifier@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You really are asking too much here

We need to get math, geography, literature, history, writing, personal finance, and driving training working again first

Want to know what my drivers ed consisted of?

Not cars, no

A signature of consent and having me/my class to view unredacted images and video of a girl who some of the people in that room personally knew from that very highschool who didn't wear a seatbelt screaming with her face having been peeled off having passed through the windshield, and similar gory aftermath images

Thats the educational bar of competence we're competing with here at least nearly two decades ago. You think it's gotten better or worse since then?

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In America, by far and away the next most commonly spoken language is Spanish. I could see a requirement making it so schools are made to teach Spanish, but I find it hard to see requiring them to teach any other language. Arguably, this might be better managed on the State level, since certain languages may be more common in different states.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Yep. I imagine Spanish is much more useful in Texas than in Alaska

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I mean, for one thing, high school lasts a finite amount of time

[–] markz@suppo.fi 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Huh, I didn't know americans need to do any foreign language. But 3 or 4 is way too much. I could barely manage 2.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

I had three and only gained actual usable proficiency in one (English).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Unless you keep using the language, you will loose it, I am bilingual Swedish/English, and since I practice both constantly, I retain my skills.

I did take Spanish as well for a few few years, but have mostly forgotten it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago
  • most people would find it useless, especially in areas not near any other country (most of the US)
  • other courses would need to be dropped or the school year expanded (not happening). The cost would also be in acquiring and retaining the talent on top of books and other materials
  • taxpayers would balk at this as they would also find it useless in most cases (why does our local welder need to Welsh to weld?)

I am a huge fan of language learning and, if I had my way, would make all high school graduates take at least six months and live in some country very different to their own (including language) to get them out of the USAmerican bubble, but that certainly isn't happening.

I'm working on language number 5 myself (more if you count the ones I just tried to get to basic greetings, yes/no, etc. in).

This topic comes up so often here...

I barely even remember much of anything taught in 2 years of spanish classes in middle school...

Now try 4 languages...

I never even have a situation where I need Spanish... and its the most popular language here behind English... imagine how quick French, German would atrophy... literally never met a french or german speaker irl...

I'm a native Mandarin speaker and since arriving in the US, I've only spoken it like to a total of 5 people maybe(?) (Mandarin not spoken at home, it's Cantonese instead) Like I rarely need it...

How many Americans (except for Chinese Americans visiting relatives maybe) would actually need to visit China?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hahah travel. Funny joke.

In truth, though, a small number of school districts do do immersive bilingual K-12 education. That means the full curriculum is bilingual...around here usually English/Spanish. Not just one class. Usually in tightly integrated (read: mixed-race) communities.

Hardest part is probably finding bilingual teachers...especially in districts that are traditionally more budget-constrained.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Setting non-travel jokes aside for aoment because somehow Americans don't travel but they also get spotted as obvious tourists in their jeans and golf shorts.

Between prior English imperialism and recent American global market share, just about any place with a decent internet connection will have English as a viable communication language. It won't always be great and you may have to talk to a few different people to find one that speaks enough English. The places I've been often have ads in English. Often enough, they're not even dual language ads.

Now combine that with American exceptionalism and you'll see Americans don't see a need to learn anything else. No, they don't see the irony in demanding the language of England as their one and only language heard in the 'States.

But, in a less cynical take, that country is huge and geographically diverse. There are many Americans that travel. Americans that travel domestically (or even only Can/US/Mex) should not be shamed. Language aside, different regions can have as much diversity as denser countries. Think about your stereotype for a resident of California, then New York, and lastly Texas. That is, after all, because the US is actually 50 states in a trench coat.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can see the argument of more focus on a second language, but more languages usually means not enough for any of them.

My high school required 3 years of a language: I took 5 Spanish courses but was clearly never fluent.

In my kids high school, it was the first class in an immersion program program from early elementary through high school. Many of them were fluent. That should be a goal.

[–] notastatist@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But how do we get the time for it in europe? We startet english in 3. Grade, french in 6. Grade and after that you could choose between spanish and science in 9. Grade in my school. Other people I know had Latin and old Greek or Dutch or polish.

A lot of people in this thread say its a waste of time to have a second language in the US, what do you learn in all this time you have??

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s a waste of time to have a “survey” of languages in an environment where you’re not regularly using them : much better to learn an additional one well. Maybe it’s different in countries with multiple languages and borders where you’ll need multiple languages every day. Yes, a second language is a good idea for any kid.

Here school generally has a fixed curriculum through eighth grade, then high school is more flexible, with minimum requirements set by state and student choice filling it out. For example my state had a requirement for three years of languages to graduate high school: I decided on 5 Spanish classes.

My youngest kid took two years of Italian but then had to switch schools where they did not offer that language, so took a little Spanish. Yes I consider that somewhat a waste because it would have been better for him to learn either of those more. However in everyday life he’s not exposed to either.

[–] notastatist@feddit.org 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I understand, that multiple languages are not needed in the US, but what I dont get is that there is until brazil just one main language other than english spoken. So why not make it mandatory to learn this language a little?

And I would argue that in school you just need to learn stuff for everyday life.. For a lot of stuff I learnd in school I will be happy if i will need it once every half a decade.

And if that is something like having a little nice conversation with somebody who doesnt speak english, I say its helpful to learn.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

The US doesn’t have a national language, but does have significant communities of many ethnicities. It is well recognized that a second language is beneficial and I have to assume most states require it, although my experience there is limited. However it’s not reasonable to mandate that everyone learn a specific one. You should learn the one specific to your circumstances.

That being said, most people have no reason to actually use the language they learned in school so are never fluent or lose it quickly. It’s a newer thing for schools to offer immersion programs to establish fluency

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago

When I was in Germany nobody tried to talk Spanish to me. When I was in sweden they didn't either. nor did they in India. If you are to be well traveled you quickly learn to find English speakes everywhere - because that is the language of travel it is enough. A second language is only useful if you limit your travels to the area they speak it.

many kids in foreign countries take years of english but they can't speak is. Those who thy speak it well and they stick in groups thus not knowing how bad the rest of the class really is.

[–] homes@piefed.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

By the time I graduated high school, I spoke Latin and German fluently. In the last 30 years, I have traveled neither to Germany, nor ancient Rome.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Na dann, what's stopping you?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

lol. if that was a requirement I would have never graduated. I even had some requirements in college. me and a buddy exchanging transcripts as we got close to garduating. My buddy. "You know, you actually get pretty good grades" (ok I don't know why he acted as if its a surprise. I think he meant it more of complimentary way than it came out) "oh. except in spanish."

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

English is the defacto global language and I think you'd be surprised how many Americans never leave the US, and how significantly fewer never leave North America.

Learning languages would be great, but there are lots of other things that the US education system has been failing at which are arguably far more important....

bold of you to assume US high schools have money for even one foreign language

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Most Americans don't travel so it would be wasted if none of those languages come to them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You're free to learn as many languages as you'd like. Foreign or, like, domestic. OMG

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›