I'll believe they were "brought to heel" if I see change.
Doubt.
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
62 points (98.4% liked)
Technology
42587 readers
443 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Don’t let this become a “protect the kids” thing. The intentionally addictive and manipulative design of these platforms has been just as harmful to people across a wide spectrum of ages. The solution is not to ban kids from using these platforms, the solution is to hold these platforms accountable for their behavior and put regulations in to ban intentionally manipulative design. Adults are just as much victims of having their brains cooked by this shit, and it’s had larger scale societal consequences that we need to take seriously.
Agreed, unfortunately I think this will only fuel further age and ID verification enforcements. And of course change nothing in the design of the platforms.
ordered to pay $375m by a New Mexico court.
Meta total assets: US$366 billion (2025)
I'm sorry, which big tech company is brought to who's heel?
As I understand it there are dozens of similar cases already started. The precedent is what's meaningful
That is $375M to a single person. This wasn’t a class action. This was a precedent-setting case that opens the floodgates for future lawsuits. Until now, actually getting courts to agree with plaintiffs has been impossible. But since courts use precedent, this allows future plaintiffs to refer to it when filing their own lawsuits.
That is $375M to a single person.
Wrong, this was state-initiated consumer protection enforcement action by the state of New Mexico. How those funds get distributed is up to the state government.
https://nmdoj.gov/press-release/new-mexico-department-of-justice-wins-landmark-verdict-against-meta/
Not a lawyer, but doesn't this mean it was the state the sued and won, and not a private citizen..?
Mark Zuckerberg should’ve started a pedophile ring instead. He would’ve gotten off easier.
I think we're still waiting to learn whether he did, or not, though.
Doesn't this just sound like what they want from all this anyhow? A reason to implement 'age verification'
Not sure this is what social media wants. They want to maximize shareholder value. The teen segment is crazy valuable since a lot of them are able to convince parents to buy them all kinds of shit. Without this segment, advertisers will turn to other platforms and thus remove lots of ad money from these platforms
I don't think that's what the parents or kids want, but I do think that'll be what happens, yes.
I guess I should clarify I'm referring to the corporate overlord illuminati 'they', not the victims of the aforementioned conspitators 'they'
I would be hopeful if this wasn't up to the US justice system
"US Justice" system exists like the tooth fairy exists. We have a legal system, not a justice system, and it's working exactly as intended.