Not really, because they didn't pass funding for immigration but that already got a huge ocean of money in the last big budget bill so they have plenty of money but didn't get any new restrictions.
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
55 points (84.8% liked)
politics
29121 readers
1268 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It was a way of caving and not looking like they are caving. It's honestly a win in the eyes of a majority of people that only half pay attention.
I'm notpaying attention at all, and don't even know what you guys are talking about.
In the last reconciliation bill they gave ice an extra 70 billion for whatever so they have 2-3 years of funding without getting any new money.
No. ICE was already plenty funded from last summer's bill, which is why they're still on the streets and in the airports. The Democrats were (supposedly) fighting for restrictions on ICE: no masks, warrants required, limits on use of force, etc. Once again, they got absolutely none of the things that they were supposedly fighting for.
The Republicans, however, get to claim they've "ended" the shutdown, and have also gotten pretty much everything they wanted.
Restrictions only work if they're enforced, too, so giving resources in exchange for rules, without any changes to enforcement, is a losing strategy.
Losing strategy is the dems favorite thing to do though 😭
It was a winning strategy, but Starmer kicked an own goal as usual. That wasn't accidental.
Whatever they may have gotten passed in the Senate, calling it a win before it's made it through the House is premature.
House Republicans rejected it, hence why the article.
Once ICE funding runs out and harm on the ground stops, the dems will have won. This is step 1. They can't make it there without the first step, but if they don't actually make it to affecting real people, this is just Lucy telling Charlie Brown to kick the football for the 4258tg time.
So, 4 year government shutdown?
Lmao these fucking headlines are such a joke.
No.
Next question.
Woah, I wouldn't go that far. There's still plenty of time for them to capitulate still.
its funny how these things go out as like one thing in a process goes out and is not complete.
I'm curious about how the writers are going to resolve that "TSA paycheck" plotline. The Senate going out for recess is a decent cliffhanger, but it feels like the writers are going to develop another arc. Maybe they'll give us another Iran episode while the TSA arc is on hold?