this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026

265 points (96.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11159 readers

1949 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
Absolutely no NSFL content.
Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31@lemmy.world

aeronmelon@lemmy.world

needanke@feddit.org

265

using github should've been a warning sign (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 23 hours ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://hai.z0ne.social/notes/ak73r5iib137003t

top 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ratsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Bug reports are contributions from people who try to help your project. I don't go to Github issues to complain - i can do that on socials. I do it as a service for the devs, to make them aware of an issue they may not yet be aware of.

Treating issue reporters like this is just disrespectful of the work they are trying to contribute.

Note that this message only appears AFTER someone has already gone through the work of writing an error report. At that point, just throwing their work into the toilet SUCKS.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 13 hours ago

It does seem hostile to use a bot deletion and message. The github has an issues tab, it has a submit button. A reasonable user would find their github, and then submit an issue in the normal github bug reporting place on a page that looks like a normal and active issues page only to then be met with the bot deletion message.

Github has the option to disable the issues tab, which they reccomend for projects that do not take bug reports through github. These devs didn't do that. It appears they use the issues tab for issue tracking internally within the team. The result is a public issues page, that looks just like a normal one that takes user submissions.

The project does say they they only take bug reports on discord on the readme and on the contributors page, both of which are below the fold on browsers. The information is provided in advance of a submission, but not in a way most users will be likely to find it when trying to submit bug reports, as the issues button is directly at the top of the screen.

Their github is indexed on search engines and came up as the second result when searching for "game native" in my test. The discord is not in search results. Users are far more likely to find the github than the discord when searching.

I would hope its unintentional, but it really seems like these devs have set a trap. Reasonable users will find the issues page, spend their time writing a report, only for a bot to autodelete. Its cruel.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Can you write a blank report to check if they're doing this, and then edit it if they're not?

[–] ratsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

You could, but you'd have to know that some people do this, and it is confusing to maintainers if empty issues keep popping up.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Possibly, or, you can chec, the code .github folder for workflows the repo is using.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Is it to filter AI contributions or are they just into propreitery information blackholes.

[–] AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I run multiple containers from a single dev, and I could switch to someone else's images, but it's a hassle. Once I ran into an issue, I realized the sole support is provided on Discord. Which, whatever, I think it's awful because it's not openly searchable on the internet, but it's his choice. However, what I found extremely dumb is ALL announcements, changelogs, including breaking changes, are posted exclusively on his Discord server. Nowhere else. And he acts all pissy about people stumbling into the server for help and not finding the exact announcement, and being trigger happy with the bans. I get people being dumb and not reading basic instructions, but this goes beyond that. Your whole fucking operation is on a closed Discord server with subpar search function.

[+] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

How much do you donate to his project?

[–] expr@piefed.social 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Developing a FOSS project does not absolve you of any and all responsibility to not be shitty. In order for the system to work, everyone involved (developers and users alike) should be stewards of the commons.

[+] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -11 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

What if someone is simply bad at dealing with people or have very limited time and can't provide adequate support. Should they stop developing?

[–] expr@piefed.social 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That is in no way related to what I said.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I meant someone who is bad at dealing with people and is perceived as "shitty", i.e. is not a "steward of the commons". It's still their responsibility when developing FOSS so they should stop if they are not able to do it?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Some people lack the skills to run a project and should stick to contributing code.

If you can’t collaborate, don’t lead the project.

[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago

Anyone can develop anything they like in their free time and put it out there as open source, making them "leader of a project".
No one forces you to use it or engage with it in any way.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

of it's on an open, or semi-open, platform, then you can invite volunteers to help out.

discord is dogshit for that.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

What if someone is bad at working with people and doesn't want to work with anyone? Should they just stop developing FOSS?

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

that is exactly when you get someone from the community involved...that's the entire point of having a community.

[–] tophneal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If a developer wants to make a project available for public use and not provide support or allow a community to develop and fill that gap, they should at least blatantly state on the project page they aren’t willing to provide support and the project will always be as-is.

If even that’s too cumbersome for them, then I’ll say it, yeah they should pack up their toys and gtfo. That’s just operating in bad faith and they should seek different avenues if they want to continue developing, or hell, make their repos private and inaccessible to the public.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

First time I see someone trying to dictate to other people what code they can and can't make public. Nice. Should we start banning repos that don't provide adequate support and information? Fuck their freedom of expression unless we can make full use of their work, right?

[–] tophneal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Your argument is in bad faith. No one said “ban” but you. In regards to their free speech, I think you might be forgetting that technically in the US, free speech is protected from government actions NOT those of private entities or individual members of the public. It wouldn’t be inappropriate at all if the FOSS community gave devs like the one described the proverbial boot.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

they should pack up their toys and gtfo

That doesn't mean "ban"? If this means "keep publishing your code the way you want and where you want" then there is some language barrier here.

ban - To refuse to allow (someone) to do something, go somewhere, or be a participant; exclude.

"You're not banned from this community but get the fuck out". That sounds weird to me.

So what does "get the fuck out" mean to you in this context?

gave devs like the one described the proverbial boot.

Just to be clear, still not taking about banning, right? Just about kicking someone out of the community?

technically in the US, free speech is protected from government actions

I'm not taking about freedom of speech by freedom of expression. The idea that I may have an app I build for personal use, I publish the code on github in case someone else want to use it, just take a look at the code to learn something or modify it for their needs and a guy like you shows up and says "you have to accept my issue report and fix it or say on your website that you don't provide support. Get the fuck out otherwise, your project can't be FOSS" is just insane to me. If that doesn't sound insane to you then we have a fundamental disagreement about what FOSS is.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The documentation is already posted on the discord.

Just post it on github, where the code resides already.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Github is owned by Microsoft. You should move all your repos to gitlab.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's not the point I am making.

Github at this point isn't a good choice. The issue OP is having is that the documentation (changelogs, updates, etc) are solely on discord.

The documentation is done, and the maintainer only needs to take 5 mins and post it on the git repo as well.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Since apparently we're allowed to make demands of FOSS projects now I'm saying I don't want to use github so move it to gitlab or close you're project. The code is done, just push it to a different repo.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

I feel like you're being dense on purpose, judging by the replies you posted in the thread. You're just trying to derail conversations.

The work is already done, just post it in both places and everyone is happy. Literally 5 mins of work.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

hopefully nothing

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 71 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

locking down issue submission is ok due to AI spam and some of the vitriol of the open source community. telling people to sign up for a proprietary service that continues to get enshittified and is a walled garden with terrible search if they have problems is sort of shit. looks like it could be this repo: https://github.com/utkarshdalal/GameNative based on the response to every closed issue

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 27 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

is sort of shit

Is straight up shit, otherwise, agreed.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago

I refuse to use gamenative for this reason, fuck gamenative

[–] The2b@lemmy.vg 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder what repo this is. Could this be an effort to combat bad ai issue report spam?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This seems to come up in cycles. The last time I asked, they were usually warez or other questionably legal software.

Even still, you are hosting your code on a public platform. Requiring Discord to submit issues is absolutely stupid. Setup a community and have people submit there.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The code is being given away for free. It is the Internet equivalent of leaving a piece of furniture on the curb with a piece of paper taped to it saying "free".

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

A couch isn’t an ongoing project asking strangers for help and suggestions. If you don’t want people to complain about or contribute to your project, just don’t distribute it or it’s source. If you make your project public you don’t get to cry about how the public criticizes your stewardship of that project, regardless of how “free” it is.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

On the flip side, complaining about how people give away free code as a side project isn't really useful. They are doing something on their own and not affecting you.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

What are you talking about? If you’re trying to build software that is useful to anyone but yourself complaints are incredibly useful. Do you think feedback forms that show up all over software are for sending nothing but compliments?

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago

Fair tbh I’ve see ln a lot of unhelpful comments and issues left on repositories that end up getting popular outside of programming circles.

[–] GandalftheBlack@feddit.org 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Estelle spotted

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

How did I miss her?

[+] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Don't use it? Why would anyone get mad at developers for organizing things the way they like? If I want to I can make my app available only on USB sticks carried to people by swallows (African of course) and accept issues only through Amber alerts. And you can just not use it if you don't like it.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

✅ Organizing things the way they like

❌ Forcing anyone to use Discord for any purpose

If I want to I can make my app available only on USB sticks carried to people by swallows (African of course) and accept issues only through Amber alerts

Sure, but you'd be a colossal asshole and make using your app a miserable if not impossible endeavor 🤷🏻

And you can just not use it if you don't like it.

Ah yes, the George W Bush approach to feedback: "if you're not [unquestioningly] with us, you're against us" 🙄

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

❌ Forcing anyone to use Discord for any purpose

So don't use my app? Please, explain to me how I'm forcing you do to anything by writing an app. I seriously didn't realize coding gives me so much power over people. Can I force you to do other things like pay me for my app? Can I force you to contribute to it? I actually could use some help with my project. If I create a discord server for it will you be forced to join and help me?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

You know what I mean, don't pretend to be even more obtuse than you already are.

While not LITERALLY forcing anyone to do anything, it's not ethically defensible to enforce a choice between not using a potentially useful app (which might theoretically be the only one of its kind and thus crucial) or using a privacy nightmare app in a time of increased surveillance being carried out by authoritarian governments that increasingly victimize dissenters up to and including killing or deporting them for not being in favor of kakistocratic fascism.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 0 points 17 hours ago

Just pretend the app doesn't exist there's millions of apps you never heard and will never know they exist it's fine. And no it's not the government violating your rights that's a totally different scenario

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

ethically defensible to enforce a choice between not using a potentially useful app

Seriously? Your claiming that as an app developer I have an ethical responsibility to make it available to anyone who can find it useful? That's some heavy "with great power comes great responsibility" stuff.

I wonder how you square it with commercial app development. I guess charging money for an app is always unethical because some people may not be able to afford it.

I distribute my app only though f-droid so people with stock android will soon have issues installing it. I guess it's also unethical and I have to give my personal data to Google so I can put it in play store. But isn't it unethical for users to request that I share my data with Google? That's some serious ethical paradox here.

Does this apply only to software development or anything I do? I made a cake the other day. Would it be unethical for me not to give it someone who would like to eat it? Can I ask them to come to my home to get it or it's an unethical barrier and I should take it to them?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Seriously? Your claiming that as an app developer I have an ethical responsibility to make it available to anyone who can find it useful? That's some heavy "with great power comes great responsibility" stuff.

No. I'm saying that it's unethical to make the proper use of your app contingent on the use of unethical platforms such as Discord who share your data with people who might victimize you as a result.

Might as well direct all inquiries to Facebook or the personal email of Peter Thiel.

I guess charging money for an app is always unethical because some people may not be able to afford it.

Another strawman argument 🙄

I distribute my app only though f-droid

Good

so people with stock android will soon have issues installing it.

Bad, but not your fault

I guess it's also unethical

No.

I have to give my personal data to Google so I can put it in play store

Another strawman. Do you REALLY think I'd consider it unethical to force people to surrender their data to Discord and at the same time demand that other people surrender theirs to Google?

Unlike you, I'm not a hypocrite who cares about my own data security but not yours.

But isn't it unethical for users to request that I share my data with Google?

Yes.

That's some serious ethical paradox here.

Nope. You're making shit up to make it sound like my position is illogical when in reality it isn't. That's what a strawman argument is.

Does this apply only to software development or anything I do

What do YOU think?

Can I ask them to come to my home to get it or it's an unethical barrier and I should take it to them?

Do you live at the Discord offices? Is your home full of surveillance equipment that transmits directly to a third party? If not, that's yet another logical fallacy, namely a particularly ridiculous case of false equivalence.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Great, thanks for explaining. So if I understand this correctly you're saying I can lock my app and not share it at all and I can charge money for it but it's unethical for me to use platforms that share user data with bad people. That's very curious philosophy. I don't have to share the fruits of my work with anyone but when I do I have to do it in a way that adheres to other people ethics. That would be like putting my cake in a place that's under face recognition camera and saying it's free. People would see delicious cake but wouldn't be able to get it without showing their face to Palantir. They can just not get the cake if they are worried about privacy but they really want it so it's on me to look for a different place for my cake. If I don't move it I'm unethical.

Does this philosophy have a name? It would be interesting to read about ethics of sharing like this. The way I see it it's my cake and I can eat it myself or share under any rules I see fit. I don't have any ethical obligation to make it available to people in one way or another. Where does my obligation to share it in a privacy respecting manner come from? If it's ethical to not share something how sharing it in a wrong way become unethical?