Seems like state law enforcement might need to raid Chad Bianco's house.
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
238 points (99.2% liked)
politics
29002 readers
1349 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
that implies state troopers don't like what he's doing
Of course he is a rabid trumper
There needs to be a law that candidates cannot do their own election investigations or seize anything whatsoever or in any way tread upon the election process, it belongs to the people not the candidates. They can and will use established methods for challenging elections or suffer the consequences of becoming a felon.
They already sort of are and that's a good thing. The way some elections work is there's a representative from both parties observing and counting the ballots. Then they can both check each other's work and make sure everything's above board.
This is why the whole election denial stuff is even more bullshit, they have official observers in there who can blow the whistle if they see anything but they never do. So they just rely on "reports" of other outside observers who think every truck moving around a polling spot is full of fraudulent ballots.
It probably shouldn't be just election workers as they're just selected by whoever applies to a temp job for a day or two, and it wouldn't take much for all those people to just happen to be partisans
Does California not have state troopers? Shouldn't they be arresting the guy? For tampering with evidence if it's a real investigation. For stealing public records otherwise.
If you call 911 for BS, you may end up in legal trouble and have to pay a hefty fine for wasting resources.
Why the hell are these GOP cucks continuing to call every election they lose a fake and waste resources on this?
Because it's not just about their race. It's about all future races. It's about convincing people that the election process can't be trusted.
The sad thing is...that it's working.
If we can't vote, we don't have to pay taxes. Right?
You still get to vote, even Russia goes through that charade.
Sucks that just killing thembefore they kill us wouldnt fix any of this. It would be such a simple fix if it worked.
Because it's right out of the Russian playbook to subvert elections, sow discord and disrupt institutions of democracy.
We saw why in 2020. If there's distrust, a certain side will have a tendency towards violence to get their way, results be damned.
Sneak preview of November
Anything to sow doubts about the election! Tax payers are funding this, of course.
Its really sad that killing cops would not meaningfully fix any of our many many problems, because it would be so easy.
Normalizing actions like this so when he loses he can seize the ballots and claim what he wants as the election result
I know this isn't really the right time for this, but the US desperately needs a proper census system, the fact that there is a debate if a voter is properly registered or not for a general election is insane.
there is no real debate, just like there is no real debate that climate change is happening.
It is a ruse, a “big lie” repeated over and over again as a long-term strategy to gain authoritarian control.
So if someones ID expires and the "save" act went through, I'm curious if they would actually accept a birth certificate. It's not like a birth certificate even could have a photo ID on it. I believe it or not have grown about 200lbs since then. So the picture would be useless anyways. Then obviously people point out that a birth certificate is useless for anyone with a name change unless they are bringing the name change paperwork (marriage certificates or the like) just to prove they are that person. Half the country doesn't have passports do to cost and the fact that they expire as well. Drivers licenses aren't held by everyone, cost money, and also they can be legally suspended or taken for driving infractions which do not have anything to do with whether or not you are legally allowed to vote. Not to mention they expire as well.
The only way the save act would make sense is if everyone was provided free identification that was valid and you didnt need any other identification to acquire it. You don't have to own a house to vote, you don't have to be on a lease to vote, your name doesn't have to be on a electric bill or such to vote. So none of those documents would make sense to ask for.
There is no easy way to do a system that is better than what is currently in place and as far as the majority are told, there is no evidence of it being tampered with enough to change it.
They don't want an accurate account so that way they can make up whatever number they want.....
they're going to bungle it intentionally so they can point to inaccuracies and claim california's 2026 vote is fraudulent. let me tell you how i know: they did not hire qualified auditors. you want this done right, Ernst&Young or KPMG are the only folk for the job. hell, pwc would do it honorably and the republicans and them have a history.
also they are republicans, but like, there are professional, unbiased reasons too why this is pure partisan poppycock
edit: fuck deloitte
The funniest thing that could happen in CA is voters have to choose between two Republican governors and they both argue about the other rigging the election.
Except for one of those two fascist idiots ending up being in charge of the state. THAT would be decidedly unfun.
There would be a recall 3 seconds after they take office lmao
One would hope CA realizes they need to change their voting system to stop being garbage after this. Jungle primary with top 2 (or top 4) advancing is fine, but there needs to be approval or ranked voting in the first round.