If I was cynical - which I absolutely am - I'd say maybe it's a total nothingburger that's being overplayed as a distraction from something else?
this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
43 points (97.8% liked)
No Stupid Questions
47232 readers
987 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
A bunch of US states (and other western countries) are flirting with, passing or have already passed laws saying operating systems must implement "age verification" for the completely disingenuous purpose of "protecting the children" or the companies that make the Linux distros will be liable for infringement and severe penalties. This, naturally, makes many of the companies involved that make Linux distros really eager to implement age verification. Many of said companies are backed and funded by large, powerful tech companies who are lobbying for exactly this legislation because it makes life extremely difficult and uncertain for Linux users, while at the same time it makes life easier for them and their extremely child-unfriendly content platforms that they want to maintain the ability to manipulate children with and blame Linux when children get manipulated by it saying that Linux should've told them the user was a child and it was actually Linux's fault that the child got manipulated, not them.
Meanwhile, the users and maintainers of Linux itself, the systems that make up Linux, and even the maintainers and contributors to many Linux distros, who are real human people and not faceless corporations, think following unjustified laws is unjustified, see through this lobbying for the dishonest cop-out it is, think this is fucking garbage, and are telling the corpo scum to go fuck themselves with rusty knives. This is entirely appropriate and reasonable in this case.
Hope that helps explain what's going on.
An optional field was added to the userdb to allow storing birthdate. That's it.
An optional field in the userdb JSON object. It's not a policy engine, not an API for apps. We just define the field, so that it's standardized iff [sic] people want to store the date there, but it's entirely optional.
iff [sic]
Brought to you by the same people as HTTP_REFERER, I assume ;-)
iff = "if and only if"
Basically saying the field's there if you need to comply with the law, but otherwise you don't need to use it, just like the other fields.
Fix: a useless field was added by a random non-core contributor, and merged by a Microsoft employee.
That's it so far.
Also, it wasn't a core maintainer who created the PR, which you want for something this sensitive.
Why would it matter who it was that contributed the code?
It's just an extra field that was added to the UserDB. The methods used to access that information have not chaged AFAIK.
entirely optional
Until its not. Rome wasnt destroyed in a day
Yes, but the slippery slope is also a fallacy.
Caution is better than panic.
There's ample evidence there is an organised international push for these mass surveillance efforts in many countries all at once, do you deny this?
Assuming some jurisdictions implement some kind of device based age restrictions, should linux just not exist in those places?
I would argue, for now, this is malicious compliance from the open source community.
Adding an optional field in the UserBD to store an age covers the requirements of the law, without trying to help with the spirit of the law
But I do understand the boiling the frog side
Lets be cautious and remove the mechanism.
iff [sic]
In case you are unaware, "iff" is short for "if and only if", i.e. bidirectional implication. It's not a typo.
It is a word, but I don't think it's really applicable here. The standard exists even if no one wants to use it or ever does.
Exactly, making it possible for admins (parents) to set up systems with rules based on age for their many children
They can install some parental controls from the package manager. This doesnot need to be in fucking systemd.
This was a good write-up of what's going on: https://www.sambent.com/the-engineer-who-tried-to-put-age-verification-into-linux-5/
~~They have changed course, thankfully:~~
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/41179
edit: my mistake, I saw this briefly earlier today and thought it had been merged, not just closed.
They haven't, whatever your opinion on it...
Pottering responded no and closed it, stating it's just an optional field others can use how they please
Read the dam things you post >_<
Looks like Microsoft funds and maintains systemd so they can exert control over all the Linux bistros and force this shit in
Do you believe Microslop funds and maintains systemd because Lennart Poettering works there, or is there more to it than that?
If it's just that Poettering works there, you may be interested to know that he left in January this year.
Lennart Poettering left Microsoft, not systemd
And they left for PR reasons, to literally appear not evil and to "build trust"
Looks like Microsoft funds and maintains systemd so they can exert control over all the Linux bistros and force this shit in
Some rando foolishly submitted a systemd patch and it got rejected after some back and forth. I think there's not much more to it so far.
I read in another thread that it was merged
Yeah there was some back and forth. It got approved by someone from Microsoft then unapproved by Lennart Poettering. Basically temporary kerfluffle. There's a writeup from yesterday, I think this: https://itsfoss.com/news/systemd-age-verification/
There's now an unpopulated field to hold a birthdate but it's not being used by anything. I guess that is sub-optimal though. This kind of thing if it's to exist at all should be on individual user accounts, not anything system-wide.
then unapproved by Lennart Poettering
No, you've misunderstood, here is a quote from your own source:
A merge request asking for this change to be repealed was struck down by Lennart
It was a reversion that Poettering rejected, the PR stands.
UserDB does hold data connected to individual user accounts