this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
52 points (96.4% liked)

Asklemmy

53927 readers
472 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 41 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Realistically?

  • Housing that doesn't cost a fortune

  • Healthcare that doesn't bankrupt you

  • Food that's both affordable and worth eating

None of it is futuristic. All of it feels further away than ever.

[–] polysexualstick@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

That's not tech, that's policy. Technologically there are no holdups to this, capitalism just needs it to not be so

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

When I was a kid in the 80s I thought we'd absolutely have some kind of moon base by now. More space stuff in general. What is more "future" than space?

Green energy is maybe 10 years behind where younger me would have wished it to be, it feels we're close to some big breakthroughs. I'm still hopefully to see some game changing things in my lifetime.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I thought VR/AR would be farther along. There was a pitch 10 years ago that VR would be the β€œfinal platform” in that anything a phone, TV, tablet, or computer could do could be easily emulated in VR.

Unfortunately it’s still all walled gardens. Also nobody wants to wear that shit for more than an hour.

[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Brain implants are progressing, so I'm still hopeful to see full-dive VR in my lifetime. Also scared of how it will be enshtitfied.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah... as amazing as full dive VR would be, I'd be afraid that weaponized would be a better term for how it would be implemented than enshitified.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

More specifically I thought one of the approaches to an omni-treadmill would catch on enough for an at-home model to be available to the public.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Better general medical science. So much of what we use is very old tech. We still can't regrow cartligage. We still pin bones together with titanium screws. We still mostly use fiberglass casts (though better alternatives exist). We still catch the common cold.

[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

When I went to the hospital for a broken bone, I thought this tech was already there since tech was advancing so quickly, going from Pac-Man to Super Mario 64 in 16 years.

My vision:
'At the very least I'll get to see a 3D image of my broken bone and maybe there'll be 'dentist chair tools' that can straighten and fill up the bone like a dentist does with your teeth. I mean, we advanced a lot in computer technology right?'

The reality:
'Here's your 1950s X-ray picture. You see that Rorschach test blotch? That's where it's broken. We've done our job, have a good day!... Your visit is over!... You can leave now!...'

That was 30 years ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought we'd have affordable 8TB SSD's.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

LED light bulbs were supposed to last a bajillion hours. When they came out around 2010-ish they were still expensive and I spent many hundreds of dollars replacing every single light bulb in my house, thinking I would basically never have to replace a light bulb again.

It's 2026 and I now replace the LED bulbs in my house almost as often as I replaced incandescent bulbs. Seriously? LEDs are solid-state technology. There are no moving parts, no gases, no hot filaments...

I understand that it's probably on purpose; if everyone replaced all the light bulbs in their house with LED bulbs that lasted basically forever then who would buy more light bulbs from light bulb manufacturers.

But it's still just dumb. Either LED technology is flawed, or our economic system that incentivizes a constant cycle of replacing bulbs is flawed. This should should not exist in 2026.

[–] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oh that's a fun one. Original incandescents lasted a very long time. Too long (over 10,000 hrs, and there are many examples of ones that have been lit for decades!). The various manufacturers actually conspired(spent a lot of money on research and development) to a 1,000 hr operational benchmark. Profits exploded.

This is common (engineered predictable fault.)

[–] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The Phoebus Cartel was objectively terrible, but it turns out there are perfectly good engineering reasons to limit them to 1000 hours. It has to do with the chemistry of tungsten. Those bulbs that last forever give off exceedingly little light, and the 1000 hour rule is from a standard that predates the cartel.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JustinTheGM@ttrpg.network 16 points 2 weeks ago

no hot filaments...

There may not be filaments, but heat is still an issue for LEDs.

Some bulb manufacturers basically overdrive cheaper diodes to get extra brightness at the cost of generating extra heat. Some of those manufacturers compensate for the heat in some way, others don't even bother and produce bulbs with a service life of months instead of decades. Some of these are fly-by-night online sellers that won't exist anymore by the time their products start to fail. Others are established brands that people will blindly purchase based on a reputation that no longer matches reality. There are some reliable brands out there if you read up on it, but why the fuck should we have to research every little inane item in our life?

Aside from corporate greed, though, there are other reasons heat causes early LED bulb failure. Two common ones are incompatible devices on the same circuit (like light dimmers), and installing the bulb in an enclosure without adequate heat dissipation (like a ceiling 'boob' light).

I've been all LED for well over a decade, and have had a good experience so far. I personally tend to buy smart bulbs that can put out way more light than I need, and run them at 20-50% brightness most of the time. Feit Electric and Govee's basic smart bulbs have been pretty reliable for me, but I admit I'm a pretty small sample size. I know I'm paying a premium for that approach, but it's not unreasonable and I do prefer not having to worry about it.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Something is wrong with the ones you're buying, then.

Studies show that they do, on average, last dozens of times longer. Personally I replace them way less often than incandescent.

I suppose the earliest ones were worse and there are definitely garbage ones out there. And even good brands have a did here and there. And if you have poor/inconsistent power, or placing them in hot, enclosed fixtures, they don't perform as well as they could.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] eightpix@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
  • Genetic-level diagnoses and treatments.

  • Inexpensive, rapid genome sequencing.

  • Commonplace genetic counselling for more than just pregnancy.

  • Laws in place to govern the collection, use, ownership, and patenting of human genes and genetic information.

  • Cloned tissues (i.e. blood, skin), organs (i.e. heart, lungs, kidneys) for transplant or repair.

I graduated university the same year the Human Genome Project first published completion. Certainly, that project uncovered more questions than answers.

Also, we've done an absolutely garbage job of becoming appropriate stewards of this technology. Primarily, today, it would be used to identify, segregate, subjugate, and eventually kill a portion of the population.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 17 points 2 weeks ago

Compassion, empathy, socialism.

[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

More of a pet peeve, but I thought IT would be way more stable by now. Everything has so many bugs and it's just accepted. I've grown pessimistic about new tech and I would prefer to wait a couple years before getting it. It's not novel if it's broken.

Side thought, I thought we would have hologram phone calls by now.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 14 points 2 weeks ago

Fusion lol.

Better space tech or at least a moon base.

Modular body parts like in cyberpunk

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ability to live in balance with the earth

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 14 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Computer phones. As in I just connect to screen and keyboard, and phone is my main desktop.

Cheaper EVs.

Working lab fusion.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Guillotines and a lineup of billionaires in straight jackets

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Really fancy guillotines, with Internet Access, Bluetooth, and AI, of course.

"I'm Alan, your Virtual Execution Assistant. I can offer you a choice of a Last Cigarette, or Last Words, which would you like to choose?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Phones that can be opened up and have internals replaced, like desktop computers

[–] laughingsquirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That one is still exclusive to a few select countries and won't ship to mine :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Level 4 self driving cars.

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I thought we would finally have haptic touchscreens in our devices. There were some experiments in the past, but it never happened outside of niche industry applications.

Makes me a little bit sad, because being able to feel elements is really useful - I can type blind on my Titan 2 phone (which has a real keyboard) and in cars, it would really improve safety.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

Windshield wipers that don't smear.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the self tightening shoes would have been doable. But we still didn't get those.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Synthetic meat that's actually edible/palatable

[–] polysexualstick@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Good synthetic meat exists, it's just more expensive to produce so you usually can't buy it at like a corner store or something

[–] doomsdayrs@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We have that already and I've eaten it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's hard to synthesize the animal suffering that people crave

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago

That is objectively a silly thing to say.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I definitely thought we’d have Ar glasses by now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wer2@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Self driving cars. Ten years ago I said, "we'll have this worked out in 10 years". What a fool I was.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

I thought we would be able to redo our dna in adults using viruses or other vectors completely. Where we are now I thought we would be in like 2010. So we are making progress but I thought we would be farther along and genetic disease would be a thinf of the past.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 6 points 3 weeks ago

Actual hoverboards, as promised.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

Those thin transparent screens you see in sci fi movies.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I thought that by now we would've commercialized at scale alternative battery technologies. We're still using lithium ion even for grid storage and EV's.

Also, I expected we would have put a man on the moon by now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A cure for all diseases and illnesses.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You thought this would happen by 2026?

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί