this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
263 points (98.5% liked)

News

37032 readers
2184 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The latest edict from beard-obsessed Secretary of War Pete Hegseth adds strict new regulations to his crusade on facial hair, which rights groups have characterized as an attack on troops’ civil liberties.

In a March 11 memo, Hegseth, who has made grooming and appearances a central focus in his time at the helm of the U.S. military, raised the bar to qualify for a religious exemption to his blanket ban on beards. The guidelines lay out a strict new process by which service members may apply for a religious exemption and subject those who’ve already received one to a reevaluation, arguing they need to ensure their religious beliefs are “sincerely held” and have a genuine conflict with the grooming standards.

Service members who have spoken against Hegseth’s focus on grooming standards say his restrictions on beards are exclusionary to people from religious communities that require adherents to follow specific tenets of faith around beards, hair, and other grooming matters.

Sikhs, for example, who have served in the U.S. military since at least World War I, are required by their faith not to cut the hair on their head, to keep a beard, and to wrap their long hair in a turban. Members of many schools of Muslim tradition likewise have rules around beards and hair length.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 90 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The old testament also says "Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard", but he's got a pretty good haircut. It also says no clothes of mixed materials (so that poly-wool suit and poly-cotton shirt he's wearing are no-gos). And it says no tattoos too, but he pretty famously has quite a lot of tattoos. Sounds like his own faith isn't sincerely held.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, but you see Leviticus is from the old covenant and none of that applies anymore, because the blood of Christ washed away the original sin so now humanity no longer has to follow those rituals.

Except the part about gay people being bad. That part still applies even though nothing else does. Because... Reasons. Yeah. That makes sense, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marighost@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Frankly if Christians are following anything in the OT, they aren't real Christians anyway.

[–] coalie@piefed.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I am of a sect that only follows the Old Testament, we are called The Only Real Christians.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago

You mean Jews?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

he pretty famously has quite a lot of tattoos.

The Department of War's grooming standards tribunal has determined his tattoos are violations and must be brought to standards immediately. The flaying will commence in 3...2...

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Sincerity isn’t one of his strong suits

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 88 points 2 weeks ago

They love their grooming.

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

What are the odds he just can't grow a beard and is weirdly insecure about it?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, he's just a fucking racist targeting black people (which it's odd this article doesn't mention, right alongside with Sikhs).

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2025/06/27/new-army-shaving-policy-will-allow-soldiers-skin-condition-affects-mostly-black-men-be-kicked-out.html

Most shaving waivers are for soldiers diagnosed with pseudofolliculitis barbae, or PFB, a condition in which hairs curl back into the skin after shaving and cause irritation. The Pentagon may cover the laser treatment, but that can cost thousands of dollars per soldier, depending on the number of sessions required. It's unclear how many soldiers would require the procedure.

The American Osteopathic College of Dermatology estimates that up to 60% of Black men are affected by the condition. Laser treatments can cause scarring and changes in skin pigmentation.

"Of course, this is racially motivated," one senior noncommissioned officer familiar with the plans told Military.com on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation. "There's no tactical reason; you can look professional with facial hair."

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Huh, apparently he used to have one when he was on Fox News but they made him shave it: https://www.foxnews.com/video/5829694071001

And yeah you can see it's kind of patchy, in the image in OP's article too. But I don't think it's insecurity because he was on live national TV like that. (I also found pictures of him with stubble and he actually looks good like that. But no, the culture war takes priority.)

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Must be a leftover policy from Fox Entertainment stuck in his head.

After all, Trump's entire cabinet is just Fox Entertainment on a global scale, figuratively and literally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Man it took me way too long to realize the goatee fad in the 00s was because most tweens couldn't grow a full beard.

I thought the Joe Dirt:

You're just so white trash it grows in like that?

Was a complete joke, and didn't have one foot in reality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

After everything my wife has told me about the Sikhs she serves with, I'll honestly be happy if the US kicks them all out; if it comes down to a war between Canada and the US, the last thing I want is for our troops to be going up against some of the most relentlessly committed, brave and selfless soldiers you could ever hope to meet. The US military will be weaker without them, and at this point that's a good thing.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

You had me going there in the first half. Glad you brought it back around in the end.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 weeks ago

Continuing the Republican tradition of focusing on all the most pressing problems first.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The more this pissant and others of his ilk rage against beards the more I'm tempted to grow a big auld John Brown beard. I have the capacity to and simply choose not to because it gets right fucken itchy.

[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Beard oil. It exists, it is amazing, and it stopped my itching. I comb a little into my beard every one or two days, takes like 5 minutes if I go slow.

[–] Thebular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Beard oil and beard balm are why I don't look like a crazed mountain hermit. They're really phenomenal stuff!

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

for many types of beard itch, beard oil can also be a long term negative. if the itch is caused by fungal infection (same as dandruff and lots of skin issues), that infection feeds on the oils

in that case, you need daily anti dandruff shampoo, and not all are created equal: different types may work better or worse for different people

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

And it's not always treatable with shampoo. At some point, dandruff is dermatitis, and at some point after that, dermatitis may be psoriasis. If OTC topicals don't cut it, check in with a dermatologist. That's how I learned I also had psoriatic arthritis, as it was resolved with prescribed medication

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zron@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve had a beard for years now. The itchiness goes away after the first few weeks.

Anti dandruff shampoo also helps.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I grew up in a fundamentalist environment and heard tons of crap about how beards were bad or whatever. Never made sense to me, Jesus had one. Soon as I left high school I grew a beard (dirty-ass chin-strap because it was the year 2000 lol). I've sported a full beard pretty much ever since. It gives me a jawline, plus I enjoy the feeling of spite.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only time mine itched against my neck was a fresh cut to under 1/2". It was the right combo of fresh-cut squared hair ends and short length allowing a stiff stab to the neck. The hair ends taper to a flexible point after a couple weeks. It's been significantly longer for years. Now I just get some surprise tickles in my ears on polo shirt days

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

For me it's not the hairs making things itchy, it's the hair follicle itself that gets itchy past a certain length.

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Either everybody should be able to have beards, or nobody. Believing in a fairytale should not be tied to special privileges.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

That’s an easy and convenient stance to take when you nonchalantly disregard other’s religious beliefs as a “fairytale.” Those “special privileges” aren’t a “privilege,” but a duty to one’s faith.

I’m not religious, closer to modern atheists than anything else. Even I can understand and respect the nuance to the situation.

The right answer, in my opinion, would be to ban them from any form of service which would require conflicting grooming standards. That’s how you address the safety issue, not by implying “fuck your religion.”

Edit: if you so please, you can even make it illegal to (officially) change your religion during a single contract term. That way the issues are resolved then and there, before they’re assigned any duty.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For a nation that is all about personal freedom, they sure spend a lot of time telling other people what to do in areas that don't really matter. Even for the sake of military uniformity, facial hair must be maintained and groomed seems like an acceptable stance. Anything else is just power tripping.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Those “special privileges” aren’t a “privilege,” but a duty to one’s faith.

If I were to say I had a "duty" to my own atheist sense of beard honor or whatever, that'd fly out the window. Religion is a preference, a choice. The duty is only to the persons own sense of pride and morality.

We have similar problems with nurses of certain religions in my country, refusing to do their job (for instance related to abortion) and endagering patients citing religion.

Thankfully the regulations have been upheld and these people have been told "If you refuse to do your job, you're fired." in these cases, but there is a religious lobby rapidly growing in influence in my country, and have already secured exceptions from stuff like hygiene rules in healthcare.

A "beard exception" matters little in truth, but allow one such exception and suddenly they're everywhere (I'd argue let people have their beards ffs!). However, this kind of pandering is insane, dangerous and my patience for it is very limited. Religion is their choice, but that is no excuse to impose their will on the rest of society.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

I just keep thinking back to all the bullshit after 9/11, these assholes are just Al Queda with white skin and a different book to lie about

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

He sure does like his men smooth.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The drunk pedo protector is a complete sack of shit. However, to properly wear a protective mask, in a chemical warfare environment, you need to shave or the damn thing will not seal.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This made me think of a question/issue potentially. For those with fast growing facial hair how would that effect them? Like what if they shaved and had the mask on. Would the hair be able to grow and break the seal potentially? Or how long would it take between shaves for it to become unsafe? 5 hours? 10?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder how "JD" "Vance" feels about all this beard hate.

Anyway, glad that Kegsbreath is focusing on the important things: attacking the Scouts for having girls as members, awkward videos of him improperly exercising, and.....beards.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gPKGccXkLkk

load more comments (1 replies)

Hegseth only shaves so he can splash his face with aftershave to cover up the permanent smell of alcohol emanating from his pores.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

He looks like he's about to kiss a butthole.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Well, he works for that guy, so...yeah.

[–] Morphite88@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 weeks ago

I think journalists have started exclusively using unflattering pictures of him after his fit

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nothing wrong with that fetish, he should just keep it private

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine if they did this for COVID vaccine exemptions

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The better way to manage religiously mandated hair: Have an appropriate cleric give an exemption in the eyes of [insert], but only if the soldier is being deployed to a theater that has genuine NBC threat that requires properly sealed gear. I think most people can agree that to be a reasonable compromise.

Unfortunately, we got Kegsbreath, Prima Donna of Defense.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

hesgeth has a whole suite in the DOD dedicated to his glamour makeup routine.

[–] oh_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

What. A. Loser. Just because he is a babyface bitch who can’t grow a beard doesn’t mean he needs to take it out on others who can.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hegseth likes his RAARGH WARFIGHTERS ERS Ers ers faces to be smooth as a baby's bottom. That's right. Just like everyone in Trump's inner circle, baby bottoms appeal to him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Entropy_Pyre@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Ah yes, give them baby face. That will make them more intimidating.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

He just a salty bitch because he can't grow one himself.

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's just him in a pope hat, bare nekkid while wearing a giant strap on, saying the lord demands they do body shots.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

This REMF keeps being fucking funny.

Soldiers, especially men called "tier one", have gotten so used to have facial hair in the field.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

He's like this guy from Generation Kill, only somehow less serious.

load more comments
view more: next ›