this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
109 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

82801 readers
4881 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/57002935

The Trump administration is on its way to creating every authoritarian’s dream: a centralized database containing intimate details about every resident of this country, fully searchable by artificial intelligence. This powerful tool would empower the government to conduct previously unimagined levels of surveillance and harassment against its own people.

Freedom of the Press Foundation is suing the administration for documents behind the database. We know that this isn’t just something that the Trump administration would exploit; once built, it’s unlikely any administration could resist the urge to weaponize our personal information.

This nightmare privacy scenario began one year ago, when President Donald Trump issued an executive order that expanded data sharing across the federal government. The administration touted the order, “Stopping Waste, Fraud, and Abuse by Eliminating Information Silos,” as a way to target fraud within a supposedly bloated government.

The order was no such thing.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Palantir also has this database. I am in it. You are it. Have been for months.

[–] Xylian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

My fucking thought. Many states in Germany are fucking stupid and are contracting Palantir for police work. And for some illegal reasons they have access to the digital medical records of all citizen who did not opt-out.

[–] Satomune@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

Hi, I’m an AI engineer based in Japan, and I’m expanding into the U.S. market to work with more long-term clients. I’m looking for an American collaborator who can act as a communication bridge between me and U.S. clients.

I will handle the technical side myself, including project planning, AI development, and software implementation. Your role would be to join meetings, help with smooth communication, and support the client relationship side.

If this sounds like a good fit, please send me a message.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You mean to tell me that such a database doesn't already exist?

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Have you been to the DMV, or Department of Human Services?

They do not talk to eachother. At all. Your personal documents you carry on you are the database entry.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago

That just means that the lowly, customer-facing peons that work for government offices don't have access to any such master database.

Most people work for companies that hold information inaccessible to them. Other government databases would definitely be on that list.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

that database is PALINTIR linked most likely, and likely targeting leftists, progressive democratic dissidents mostly.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

By dissident, do you mean anyone who commits a thought crime?

[–] DemandtheOxfordComma@sh.itjust.works 43 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Spoiler alert. You are already in the database. He just wants to make it legal.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure how much legality matters anymore, "normalize" or "desensitize" might be better words here. Ugh. I hate that's an actual sentence I just typed. And to think there are certainly alternate timelines unimaginably worse than this. My heart breaks for alternate me. 😑

[–] Xylian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

By making it legal, Trump can enforce using it to all state agencies and not just ICE who do not care about the law. I do not know how much it matters for the FBI.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 28 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wish it was just trump. Remember Snowden in 2013? I can only imagine the level of surveillance they have nowadays.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Marketing too... You look at the history of psychology and marketing and how it was bad with cable tv and magazines and politics as well in that era. But now we have our entire lives tracked and psychological manipulation working on us basically constantly.

The human story isn't a genuine one anymore, the path of humanity is created artificially. Our own lives probably aren't the natural lives we were meant to have. We are losing genuine humanity.

...and this is what we are supposed to be willing to die to defend.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Marketers / advertisers are corrupt psychologists (the competent ones anyway), or to use oldspeak propogandists. Some timeless words for consideration.

“If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself.” – Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Propaganda, 1933 to 1945

“Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will.” – Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Propaganda, 1933 to 1945

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Gahh.... It goes deeper!!

I like the idea of calling advertisers corrupt psychologist.

But I think it's to the point even the psychology and academic industries get bought out. In a way almost like the prison system. I think we have reached a point people can go to school, get a career, and live the American dream, successfully in their eyes and in the eyes of America, without realizing in the end they are working for something that abuses honest humanity.

I hate being OCD and going down these rabbit holes. I used to just settle with the idea 50% of anything is evil and leave it at that. But now it seems like the majority is either evil or completely owned/useless in terms of living for genuine humanity. So many people are used.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 12 points 18 hours ago

I'm on the list.

It's called being a registered Democrat.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

As if we haven't been under constant surveillance and our privacy data mined for corporations for decades.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Regular Americans don't understand.

And people always talk about privacy issues being about law and legality. But the darker issue is the info being used for manipulation.

Dystopia has been here, but everyone is ignorant. That's sounds mean but it's true. Like if you detox from all the privilege and the entertain people use to escape reality, you start to see how far we have gone into the dark dystopic side of humanity.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 8 points 15 hours ago

It’s already to the point it’s too late.

Until they overreach, and the backlash cometh. The pendulum of history keeps swinging. Here's hoping it's a doozy.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 5 points 16 hours ago

Jokes on him,I'm already in at least a dozen.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, is it my turn now to say waht I want to do to him?

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 3 points 18 hours ago

I think the only new piece here is Trump wants to link in voter data.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

Compared to google they're fucking amateurs.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 17 hours ago

Anyone know if these would be subject to FOIA?