Firefox’s free VPN won’t be using Mullvad’s infra though; it’s hosted on Mozilla servers around the world (if beta testing of the feature done in late 2025 tracks).
...oh.
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
267 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
83896 readers
7368 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Please stop adding bloat to my browser. I have nothing against VPN, but it's not a fucking core feature of a web browser. Put that stuff in an extension that I can install if I want.
They should make a "Firefox Core" which contains only the browser with basic features, and then make another version which contains all the "fun" stuff.
Install LibreWolf then disable the cookie clearing and resistFingerprinting.
They need to separate gecko properly so we can build things using just the renderer.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It depends on the country you are living in. There are plenty of people with restricted and surveilled internet.
Sure, but do you think they're going to allow Firefox if it comes with a built-in VPN?
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
“Free” as you pay with your data?
~~No, Mozilla uses Mullvad as a partner, they're a serious and nolog VPN provider.
Didn't read the article, the free VPN won't be using Mullvad apparently.
It doesn't seem like it, or at least there's zero evidence I can see that this is the case. As the linked OMG Ubuntu article speculates, probably the main benefit financially is making users more likely to sign up to their paid VPN.
Aside: Based on their blog post it seems like it's a proxy rather than a VPN.
with a 50GB quota, I actually believe it's free. I use 15-20x that much on an average month.
I'm sure that's the condition, to use your data (that they protect of course) to better improve the browser. And I'm sure they are in a country where they don't have to show logs (that I'm sure they don't keep, yet somehow use your data).
They need to stick with just the browser, period. Stop trying to drift into other areas. Firefox has unfortunately gotten too heavy for what it should be, and adding even more features (good or bad) doesn't help the core performance.
The other options out there have their pluses and minuses, but if Firefox keeps pushing people will live with the negatives of the browsers that seem to care about the browsing experience of their users.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
If anyone missed them removing the "we will never sell your data" from their promise to their users, this is clearly their next step in monetizing their users.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Usable addition, and the fact that it is only in-browser is actually a merit in some cases. Firefox gets a lot of hate but is way more privacy centric out of the box compared to Chrome. AI is only opt-in and you can literally customize the entire browser using about:config. Mozilla also maintains the only real competing web engine (not considering Apple's locked in ecosystem) and they are the reason browsers are open source these days.
AI is only opt-in
Not to take anything away from your overall point, which I completely agree with, but this may be a bit of a stretch. All of the "AI" buttons and features are - to my knowledge - on by default. They have made it a lot easier to change that to "off by default now and in the future", which is very welcome, but "only opt-in" is, again, a bit of a stretch.
load more comments
(11 replies)
And how exactly do we know for certain that all that juicy web access data complete linked to whatever identifying information associated with a Mozilla account isn't going to be sold?!
Yeah, sadly Mozilla lost most of the trust one would have given to them in advance a few years ago.
Of course, my mozilla account will have the name John Smith and I was born in 1996.
The same could be said about any VPN out there. Read the ToS and privacy policy, and either believe it or don’t.
True, but Mozilla being what it had been the past few years I trust them no further than I can throw them
Edit: pay the few dollars for mullvad
load more comments
(4 replies)
For everyone who thinks this is just gonna be a way for them to somehow sell your data, I don't think so.
Think about it like this. You can buy a VPN plan for as little as $2 a month or less depending on the provider if you have a long-term commitment (e.g. 1-2 years). That pricing includes margin.
Firefox can essentially operate at lower prices than that, because they:
- Don't have to charge themselves an extra margin
- Have an economy of scale since they're not just one user paying for themselves, they're a company paying for thousands at a time
- Cap their per-user cost well below what most users actually use. (I used over 300 GB of data in the last 30 days just on my PC, almost all through Firefox, with even more on Firefox on my phone.)
I would bet this would probably cost Mozilla less than a dollar per user per month, and that's also assuming all those users are continuing to use the VPN service over time, maxing out their data limit, but refusing to pay for anything else after.
Meanwhile, Mozilla conveniently sells their own VPN service provided through Mullvad, which they make a profit on.
If a user cares enough to continue using the VPN because they want a VPN, they'll blow through the data limit and be more inclined than the average user to pay for Mozilla's option. (rather than going "I guess I'll only care about my privacy for 5 days out of the month")
If a user doesn't care enough to continue using the VPN because they were just trying it out, but they chose to use Firefox because it had a free VPN bundled in, which sold them on it over another browser, Mozilla just paid less than an ad would cost for a conversion.
And at the end of the day, it also just helps keep up their reputation as a browser that respects your privacy, which makes it easier to promote the browser elsewhere, in ads or otherwise.
This feels more like a marketing ploy that's likely to just save money on ad conversions for new Firefox users, and increase Mozilla VPN conversions, rather than something they're gonna use to super secretly siphon off your data and sell it to advertisers.
I think it would be better to compare this offer to well-known VPN providers instead of all VPN providers, since the sketchiest ones tend to have the lowest prices. The two reputable ones I can think of, Proton and Mullvad, both cost over $5/month. But cost is only half of the picture: They've also earned their reputation through a lot of time, effort, audits, even government raids.
Regardless, you have some good points. Let's take for granted that Mozilla will not attempt to share or sell user data with this free service, that it's all above-board (a fair assumption): They still have to build their reputation from zero.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Looking forward to seeing people complain that they got caught torrenting while the "Firefox vpn" was turned on because nobody understands how anything fucking works any more.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Processed by LLMs no doubt.
I loved Mozilla for years but trust nothing from them these days.
Aha so that's why they have been sabotaging themselves in the last few years. To allow for higher bandwidth per user on their vpn!!
Yeah, but they also added an AI feature that's enabled by default that I never asked for.
And I normally advocate for Firefox. It's been a good solid privacy focused browser for a while but now I'm starting to think maybe not as much.
Still better than the Chrome-alikes, but all the same I've switched to Librewolf. Problem is, foss mozilla teams like Librewolf are small and underfunded, and their ability to continue sanitizing the app forever is not garaunteed. A new vanguard FOSS browser project is needed, ideally one that continues the Netscape lineage of open and non-coercive web standards.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I don't trust mozilla though.
Just use Mullvad then instead of this roundabout way of using Mullvad.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›