drop the nuke on somewhere that doesn't belong to Palestinians,
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
72 points (98.6% liked)
memes
23752 readers
90 users here now
dank memes
Rules:
-
All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.
-
No unedited webcomics.
-
Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop
-
Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.
-
Follow the code of conduct.
-
Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.
-
Recent reposts might be removed.
-
No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Seriously. Turning the Palestinian homeland into an irradiated wasteland only to prove a point is some twisted, cruel, logic.
I would personally not like nuxlear weapons to be dropped anywhere on earth, because even the U.S. is built on occupied land, but if I had to choose it'd be Berlin.
I don't want Iran to have a nuke. However, imperial aggression from the United States has made it a necessity for them to build one.
idk, nukes are the only way to guarantee national sovereignty. I don't think we should necessarily encourage nuclear armament, but without nukes developing countries can't ever graduate to a status where they aren't subject to the whims of existing nuclear powers. I think once you can safely manage a nuclear energy program with international oversight (like Iran has done), you're demonstrating that you have what it takes to maintain a nuclear arsenal.
The recent US aggression is just more proof that nukes are necessary to maintain peace.
Exactly yeah, but I don't want it to be this way
Idealism is an interesting way of seeing the world.
well, in a more idealist sense, do we even want "national sovereignty" if we strive for worldwide class emancipation?
to be baby brained, sometimes shit sucks - but it's material reality and has to be considered and dealt with. doesn't stop it from sucking though, even if the cat's out of the bag
Idealism isn't wanting things to be better tho, or even recognizing that they are bad. Its like you said in the first paragraph, you're trying to presuppose the correct way to do social revolution.
Nukes are dangerous things, but this thread is kinda treating them like they're demons.
So you do want them to have a nuke, it's just that in some completely counterfactual world without problems you wouldn't want them to have one.
Yes that's what I'm saying. There are many compromises I need to make with ym own ideals to contend with the real world, this is far from the only one. It sucks that we have lost so bad the past 35 years that the current best case scenario involves a theocracy building a weapon of mass destruction.
Sorbians in shambles
Thanks for this comment, I'm giggling a lot
Sometimes radiation is the only way to kill cancer.
you aren't going to get zionists to stop by bombing somebody else, ever
Nukes aren't required in order to stop the zionists, normal bombs and bullets work just fine.
What's the difference between making Palestinians live in a nuclear wasteland and letting them get genocided?
Drop it on the places where Isntrael settlers came from
The United States is also stolen land.
Dubai it is
1000 more shaheds for Dubai
3 nukes on Dubai allows for 1000 more shaheds on tel aviv
posadism with LGBT characteristics
this is the only oppenheimerism i'm willing to get behind
Magacom account
?
I don't think the guy who wrote this about Sinwar is MAGA
Magacom as in ACP goon
I see no indication that he has any involvement in the ACP? Like, what is this even about? You're an admin, it's untoward for you to be doing drive-by vaguepost shootings on random posts. Either take an administration action if there's an actual problem, or don't.
I'm not American, there terms and parties you're throwing at me mean very little to me, beyond being vaguely aware of patsocs. Shouldn't this be the one site where we don't just assume everyone else is also American and has deep familiarity with all your inter-factionalist squabbles?
I assume the problem with patsocs, from my limited understanding, is that they're American nationalists? I haven't seen this guy being a rabid nationalist or chauvinist or anything, and, as seen in the post I linked above, he seems to have genuine respect for the heroism and sacrifices of the Resistance. What should I be upset about? The "our forces" in the original post isn't some nationalist thing, it comes from the quoted tweet
Oh we're doing the "Turn it all to glass" bit again? Boy history sure dose rhyme.
You can destroy all the information in a physical storage medium by overwriting it 6 or 7 times, there's no need for more than that