this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
69 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6409 readers
2245 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/62136174

Altman’s remarks in his tweet drew an overwhelmingly negative reaction.

“You’re welcome,” one user responded. “Nice to know that our reward is our jobs being taken away.”

Others called him a “f***ing psychopath” and “scum.”

“Nothing says ‘you’re being replaced’ quite like a heartfelt thank you from the guy doing the replacing,” one user wrote.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago

Let's hope it's (Altmans) time is over sooner

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Alternative headline:

Drowning man in such a panic that he drowns attempted rescuer as well

[–] jimothysupreme@lemmy.org 6 points 1 day ago

Scam Altman!

[–] MissesAutumnRains@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Before anyone just reads the title and doesn't look at the tweet or article, here it is: ![Sam Altman tweet - I have so much gratitude to people who wrote extremely complex software character-by- character. It already feels difficult to remember how much effort it really took.

Thank you for getting us to this point.](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/f397013d-66ae-4a5e-b9f9-455c99014dde.webp)

It's a huge stretch to go from that to take from that 'he says the time for programmers is over'. Like... there are plenty of very valid reasons to hate him or his company, why do we need journalism like this?

[–] hesh@quokk.au 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It doesnt seem like THAT big of a stretch

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A journalist's job is to check out the window. If you're only quoting the people saying it's raining or it's sunny, you are repeating propaganda. People who demand that journalists only quote exactly the words that are fed to them get upset when journalists actually try to explain what's happening and what those people are really doing. Journalism needs to maintain context and the consequences not written in the PR stunt.

[–] MissesAutumnRains@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, I'm totally with you on providing the surrounding context for a clearer picture. That would be an example of good journalism. Providing the context with the tweet is different than titling the article "[person] says that [programmer's] time is over". That is fully just interpreting the situation for readers and delivering it like fact. Especially with how prevalent it is for not reading beyond headlines, it's (in my opinion) irresponsible to do something like that.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He did say "thank you for bringing us up to this point" which is what the article is translating as "you're fired". Because that is indeed what it means in corporate speech, the article is correct. Everyone else is sharing the same interpretation, too, because we know what kind of guy Altman is.

That's the speech of a techbro CEO who has reached his revenue goal and is announcing that he's closing your shop.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

People support misinformation as long as it advances their position.

[–] YourMomsTrashman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Ed Zitron puts it nicely; Software engineers do way more than just writing code.