this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
183 points (92.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38609 readers
5176 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

But "the UN, UN-Nazi'd the world."

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 61 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

The UN is a diplomatic structure that exists to give state's representatives a place to gather and talk. It's not a world government. If it had been created with the intention of being one, no one would have signed on.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

It's not a world government.

Exactly. The UN is NOT a world government and we need to stop expecting it to act as one. That was never the intention of the UN.

That being said, a lot of people talk about the necessity for the "rule of law," but there cannot be the rule of law without some kind of government with the authority to enact and ENFORCE laws. If nations are not willing to sign on to something like that, we cannot have the rule of law. Instead we will have the rule of whichever country has the largest, most powerful military and/or economic influence. I know a lot of Americans are fine with that arrangement because that position is currently occupied by the US, and has been for more than half a century, but the US might not always occupy that role. How would you feel about this arrangement if China, for instance, were the world's hegemon instead of the US?

[–] violet08@lemmy.today 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The term “democratic” does a lot of heavy lifting, given that the five permanent members of the UN Security Council can veto any substantive resolution.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The term “democratic” does a lot of heavy lifting

there is only one instance of the word "democratic" and it's you saying it. He didn't edit his post. Why are you so hell bent against the UN?

[–] xkbx@startrek.website 1 points 3 hours ago

why is the UN so hell bent against OP?

[–] violet08@lemmy.today -3 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

Sorry, I misread diplomatic for democratic, but my point still stands.

I remember the first time I read about the Rwandan genocide and the UN’s voluntary and conscious inaction. It genuinely made me feel sick to my stomach.

Situations like Ukraine and Palestine/Gaza make me think about that again.

At some point, inaction becomes complicity.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Honestly, I don't think the vetoes are the main issue. In international diplomacy/law, enforceability rules discussions. If all the small countries vote to prevent the US-Iran war and intervene against the US, good luck enforcing it. The vetoes just reflect this reality.

The UN helps coordinate where there is a will to cooperate, but it can't govern the world, whether veto power exists or not. What could be done to improve this I am not sure, but it is not as simple as removing the veto.

The UN used to be involved in peacekeeping. The problem is that the world is more divided than it was before. UN peacekeepers used to patrol Gaza. They defended South Korea.

As it is now, the US has completely removed most funding from the UN. Even if the deliberative bodies wanted to be more involved in world conflicts, they don't have the funding anymore to do so. Trump is trying to strangle the UN to make room for his dictator council.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

Wait until you learn about the UN's role in the Korean war.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

If you meant diplomatic then the rest of your sentence regarding veto powers makes no sense. You clearly meant democratic the first time.

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Trump's "Board of Peace" is intended as basically official world police and several countries have signed up for it because they want to actively enforce "peace" towards anyone they disagree with.

The UN will never succeed in anything useful unless their resolutions carry economic or military weight.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

For a "place to gather and talk" they sure do use a lot of money and resources. Maybe they should switch to remote work lol

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

The UN budget for 2025 was $3.7 billion

https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/12/1158531

For comparison, global chewing gum sales in 2025 were $48.68 billion

https://www.statista.com/topics/1841/chewing-gum/

[–] Klear@quokk.au 1 points 1 hour ago

That explains why the UN doesn't kick ass.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 hour ago

10 million per day still seems like a lot, though we don't know how much the sitting around and talking part actually uses since the article mentions this:

The regular budget funds UN programmes across key areas, including political affairs, international justice and law, regional cooperation for development, human rights and humanitarian affairs, and public information.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

To justify and "legalize" imperialism and the capitalist world system more like.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 3 points 1 hour ago

? The soviet Union was a veto member no?

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 0 points 3 hours ago

But are you a nepo kid with massive generational wealth?