this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
186 points (98.9% liked)

News

36534 readers
2099 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Pentagon is considering a more robust naval presence in the Middle East to escort oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz as gas and oil prices continue to rise, but any operation won't commence for at least a month, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The Journal, citing two U.S. officials, has said that the U.S. wants to reduce the threat from Iran before undertaking any escort operation, but that could take up to a month or more to accomplish, even as officials continue to downplay concerns over the strait and the impact its closure has had on global energy markets.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 11 points 19 hours ago

Operation Vibe War is going splendidly.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 11 points 20 hours ago

Just 2 things:

You don't need a big ship to mine. A few fishing boats can drop a couple or three mines, which in such a small strait is enough to cause havoc. You don't need a biggish minelayer to do that, and apparently Iran has a few thousand mines.

Also, I read an analysis by a naval officer explaining why a single ballistic missile with a dense kinetic warhead would be basically impossible to stop, and would decommission a carrier.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

I thought the war was supposed to be over in two weeks?

Congratulations, idiot Republicans. You've started another forever war, even after you specifically voted for the guy who promised not to start any more forever wars. What are you gonna do about it?

[–] Nagrom@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago

How much is his protection racket going to cost the world?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Gotta run that oil price up further first. Gotta make Putin happy.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 18 hours ago

Exxon isn't mad either.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca -1 points 19 hours ago

lol that brainworm still alive? oh my god

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

by that time, iran would have completely mined the strait with backups just in case they try to clear it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More nine dimensional chess from the guy who couldn't make money on a casino.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 hours ago

But also somehow Putin's pick since 40 years. Man I didn't think my Saturday would be this funny already!

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Sending US soldiers to die for pedophiles and oil

Not even oil, just pedophiles

The oil markets were fine until he stuck his mushroom dick in the situation

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am afraid to ask what Donald Trump thinks are the services a good "escort" provides....

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

She's got to be at least 12, and she ... oh wait, you meant the ships. My bad!

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

30 days? Enough time to destroy all the GCC ports so that nothing can or has to be transported.

[–] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nice planning you fucking morons.

[–] Man_kind@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Who is the more foolish the fool or the fool who follows it.

Or in this case, is Trump more foolish for being a fool, or are the people more foolish for knowing this, and allowing it to continue?

The people have taken little action so far. They are just spectators, complaining on social media.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Betcha Agent Orange is gonna want an extortion fee for vessels seeking escort.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

God I hate that you're right. The motherfucker will get, like, three ships through the strait and then go on a late night rant on his Mastodon server (sorry, "Truth Social") about how "unfair" it is that the US is "doing all the work" and start demanding that other countries pay to have their shipping escorted.

[–] ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Commenting to remind myself to come back here later

Gonna get into a bidding war with Iran over who offers the cheapest pass through the straight.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lmao wtf. They're like: "ships should go through right now. We'll escort you. Also, we have destroyed Iran's fighting capabilities. Also, the escorts will start in a month."

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The trump administration got high on its own supply and believed their own bullshit about a war with Iran being a cakewalk. The US military is not the effective military it was with Hegseth and trump in command of it.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I get that. I'm just laughing at their messaging.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I'm agreeing with you.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don’t see how we can escort ships without coming under fire. There are going to be hits on US naval ships. The straight is pretty narrow which means that Iran can fire missiles and drones from inland and still be in range. Short of carpet bombing the entire coastline up to like 20 miles inland, I don’t see how this can happen without a serious risk of a US naval vessel being sunk.

Even if there are not hits, there WILL be counter ordinance fire which uses up interceptors that we have a deindling and finite supply of... This whole thing was idiotic straight from the start. You don't start an optional war with limited resources when a potential future conflict will require those resources. The rumors of China moving on Taiwan in 2027/2028 have been a thing for a while. Instead of having the reserve capacity for a peer or neer peer conflict, the US spooged them all out and gained nothing.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Modern warships carry a variety of anti-missile/drone systems. They're obviously banking on being able to swat whatever Iran sends their way. Maybe they're right. Maybe.

Hasn't worked out for the seven dead and almost two hundred injured US soldiers in the AO so far though.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

USA has no effective defenses against Unammed Surface Vehices (marine drones like the ones Iran is using in Hormuz)

reduce the threat from Iran before undertaking any escort operation

LOL Ukraine makes USVs in basements. I'm sure Iran is doing the same.

Shouldn't have pissed off Ukraine, their real-world know-how is actually really, really useful right now and nobody else has it.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually, the saddest part is, in spite of how badly the US have been treating them, Ukraine still offered to train up the US on all their anti drone warfare techniques - techniques specifically developed to combat Iranian drones - and the US told them to fuck off.

And yes, trying to simply suppress Iran's ability to launch munitions is never going to work. That didn't even work on the Houthis.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I saw a documentary talking about a Destroyers layered defenses but those layers become less effective when threats are closer and that straight is pretty darn narrow. Maybe they will be fine but wow is it a risk.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

iran only needs to target the tankers, enough to maybe cause the companies to not sail any tankers into the strait.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

What we're seeing from the conflict right now is that it's always a risk. No matter how good your defences are, reality stubbornly refuses to conform to what you mathed out in a simulator. And Iran has paid attention to the lessons of the Ukraine war; a mass of cheap munitions is the most effective way to overwhelm a very expensive air defence system. The US is still stuck in the mindset of expecting their enemies to use the biggest, baddest, most expensive weapon possible.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If Trump was a Russian asset there is literally nothing he could have done differently to do a better job to aid Russia and crush America.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago

Trump focused for a month.…? not happening. By then, my local Denny's could be his adversary.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And the escorts will mean more dead Americans in the name of a pedophile.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are only 2 answers to the following question. Why a month to begin escorts?

We either are dragging our feet to keep oil costs high for Cheeto's oil besties.

We have an incompetent military who can't plan escort missions in less than a month.

Both can be true at the same time too.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Why a month

Because that's twice as long as two weeks and Trump figures everything will have blown over by then

image

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The US didn't send enough of, or properly armed ships, for an escort mission.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

There's no way they could have anticipated a war breaking out with Iran.