this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
163 points (98.8% liked)

politics

29463 readers
1926 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has promised to endorse Jake Paul if the controversial YouTuber-turned-boxer ever runs for office.

Trump made the remarks yesterday during a speech at a packaging facility in Kentucky, after being joined on stage by the influencer.

The president’s declaration of support followed a brief speech by Paul, who later posted a video of the pair hitting Trump’s now infamous YMCA dance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 70 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I really thought Jake Paul would dissapear from public perception after the suicide forest incident but instead its always getting fucking worse with that guy. Gonna piss on his grave.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Jake and Logan Paul are the archetypical rich kids who grew to be narcissistic and functionally sociopathic.

Those two assholes would never shy away from the spotlight. And the dumbfuck iPad kids who grew up idolizing them remain as their loyal incel fanbase to this day.

Also, not that it matters because they're basically the same person, but that was Logan Paul who did the Suicide Forrest video.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Which one got their jaw broken?

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

At :20 you can see the fear in is eyes as he's about to just eat the right hook. Glorious shot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inari@piefed.zip 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The suicide forest one is Logan Paul. Jake Paul is the one who got his jaw smashed

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I literally refuse to learn the difference between them

[–] gnate@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Me with Oasis. Which one is the asshole with the bad haircut?

[–] Zanshi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you have any idea how little this narrows it down?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just make sure you don't confuse them with Paul Logan.

Also I agree and also refuse to learn the difference between them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrSelfDestruct25@fedinsfw.app 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

100% not the gay national anthem.

[–] Mastengwe@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reality has become a fucking cartoon.

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It always was. But thanks to information technology, everyone now has a front row set to the clown show.

[–] mthomson@forum.macaque.social 22 points 1 month ago

Every time I think America has hit rock bottom, Trump pulls out the jackhammer and tries to dig deeper.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just when you think things couldnt possibly any dumber.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh...we haven't seen Ted Nugent yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] clif@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I was positive this was going to be the onion.

... I really wish this was the onion.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Surly a Trump endorsement means political death nearly everywhere, no?

[–] HocEnimVeni@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Buddy I can tell you haven't been to the south recently

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2024/06/26/rough-night-for-trump-endorsed-candidates-3-trump-backed-gop-picks-lost-primaries/

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I seem to see more of these types of stories than the opposite.

Too many Trump aligned candidates seem to win, but I seem to see candidates lose when Trump vocally endorses them. To wit, Hershall Walker.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The nazi propaganda induced mental illness epidemic will not be cured with reality or logic.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

About 1/3rd of the US is still vehemently supporting Trump.

Don't underestimate how massive (nor incredibly fucking stupid) the cult is.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Sure but we can backtest the power of the Trump endorsement, and even as early as 2018, it didn't mean shit. Something thats been academically notable about Trump is how their ability to defy polling or elevate surprising candidates isn't transferable. Trumps endorsement has never meant a sure thing, and right now? You'd be better off getting Harris's endorsement.

This is a grift, I promise. There will be some stupid fucking crypto or something. He'll lose. Then he'll go work for OAN or some shit.

[–] Beero@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Sir, I hate to disappoint, but you've actually crossed into the timeline where politicians in the next decade will actually compete at how many babies they can eat at one sitting. The mask is off....

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe you haven't checked the polls lately.

The president had an 83% approval among Republicans, a 3% approval among Democrats and a 28% approval among independent voters, as well as a 48% approval among men and 28% approval among women. The survey also found that 53% of voters oppose military action in Iran, 40% support it and 7% are undecided.

https://kfanplus.iheart.com/content/2026-03-13-trumps-approval-rating-compared-to-2028-democratic-frontrunners-revealed/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Two of the dumbest criminals in modern history

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 4 points 1 month ago

If they would've grown up in a sane county, no one would know who the broke rapist who sits in jail and the egg farmer's helping hand was.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 month ago

Clown timeline

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What policies do these two people agree on?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 20 points 1 month ago

Keep crypto scams going! Also trump doesn't know policy anyway, he just signs what his handlers ask him to.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

If you're rich, you should be immune from consequences of any kind

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What makes you think that that's relevant? Neither of them run on policy

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fair enough

[–] synae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Might makes right

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Send in AJ to break his jaw

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That tracks.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump should demonstrate his support for by getting his face bashed in by a black boxer.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm neither black, nor a boxer but I'm available.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

If a group of people states that they don't condone violence and don't accept responsibility for this, but offers to crowdfund legal defense for this, is that criminal?

I'm just asking questions.

[–] homes@piefed.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If they’re both still alive by then, it is a critical failure of both this nation in this world

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I wouldn’t nominate Jack Paul to be a gong farmer… actually I take that back. That’s exactly what he should be doing.

[–] rottenmummy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am getting president camacho vibes

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's an insult to President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Camacho, and you will treat that fictional moron with respect. He was still a leader that wanted the best for his countrymen, and knew well enough to defer to the smartest man in the room. That's about as far from Trump as you can get in terms of "vibes".

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 month ago

Also not in the Epstein files.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 month ago

Is that film-a-dead-guy Paul, or fake-boxer Paul?

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That brain damaged fellow is going to need a rape kit in the morning

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›