this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
80 points (100.0% liked)

News

36419 readers
1836 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump threatened on Sunday to withhold his signature from all bills until Congress passes a GOP-led voting bill that implements voter restrictions ahead of the November midterms.

“I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION – GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY – ILLNESS, DISABILITY, TRAVEL,” Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social.

The bill, called the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or SAVE America Act, requires individuals to show citizenship documents to register to vote and strict forms of photo ID to cast a ballot. If passed, the legislation would also administer criminal penalties for election officials who register anyone lacking the required documents.

As my colleague Ari Berman wrote in February, the bill would potentially block tens of millions of Americans from voting. Nine percent of American citizens, or approximately 21 million people, don’t have ready access to citizenship documents. The bill may impact millions of US citizens in other ways: tens of millions of women who took their partner’s last name, for example, may not have a birth certificate that matches their legal name could find it more difficult to register.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 38 minutes ago

... I'm tired

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 18 points 2 hours ago

Because more and more people hate his guts with the fury of a thousand women scorned.

And for good reason.

[–] hammertime@lemmy.org 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Martial law in October. Get out or buy a gun

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 4 points 2 hours ago

The best time to get out was last year. The next best time is now.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 0 points 57 minutes ago (3 children)

I am from a country in which you normally take your ID document with you and cast your vote in person. All the millions of us do it, and the afternoon of that day we have the total count of votes. It is a very straightforward process.

I am not supporting Trump, really, but why would the implementation of this be a negative thing?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago) (1 children)

How do you get your ID document? Does it cost a lot to get? Does any official look at perfectly valid ID and say "I don't think that's real, so you don't get to vote"?

We have no national ID here, the closest thing to prove citizenship is a passport but people are not required to have one, and it is expensive. For most people, the only definitive proof of citizenship they have is their original birth certificate.

That is why here, in the US, when politicians push Voter ID laws it's mainly to disenfranchise poor people.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world -1 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago) (1 children)

I once hard (here) that people in USA is kind of against having an ID document.

It ended up anyway giving them one of the crappiest IDs in any country: SSNs

to answer your questions: it is super cheap (~5 US dollars), fast, has many security systems, it is quickly verifyable agains government databases, it has a photo, your signature, and, if valid, nobody will question it.

It looks like a mini version of the plastic card in mdern pastports (of the size of a credit card)

The police can stop you and without probable cause ask you for your ID (and car/driving documents if in a car), check it against the national database, and give it back to you. You have to show it (required by law) and it is your responsibility (if you are over 18) to keep it with you. The intention is to catch people with pending charges or arrest orders and stuff. If you are not hiding from the law, it is a simple, civilized interaction that would take you 2~5 mins.

You know, the kind of things that you would expect from a 3rd world country, less developed than USA.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

SSN isn't proof of anything except eligibility for Social Security benefits. Yes, the system is abused to cover for the lack of a national ID, but it isn't an ID.

[–] Therefore@lemmy.world 3 points 44 minutes ago

This is proof of citizenship. Not drivers license or proof of age. Passport, birth cert plus supporting, citizenship cert and supporting. Discrepancy between the latter two options resulting from change of name could disqualify voters.

"Nine percent of American citizens, or approximately 21 million people, don’t have ready access to citizenship documents."

Then you have my country where you enroll to vote, which requires id, lasts forever and you only have to update your address. On the day the volunteer looks up my given name on a ledger for my area, asks for my address and phone number, then explains how to write my vote.

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 35 minutes ago

Because the hoops they make you jump through to get one are fucking ridiculous.

I'm a US citizen. I was a born here. I have a driver's license and a US-issued passport. Both of these are current and I had to prove citizenship to get the passport.

I'm still not able to legally vote in my state, though, because the law now requires that my driver's license, which doesn't expire for 4 years, have a Gold Star on it. No gold star, you can't vote.

I now have to make an appointment and drive to a licensing station in another city to get my Gold Star license in order to vote. I have to bring my still-valid passport, two pieces of mail, and a copy of my birth certificate. I can't even vote in a primary if I don't do that first.

I was born here, I haven't changed my name or moved, this is just the law now. They just really don't want people to be able to vote.